Oh, but I do. See below.You don't know crap about liberals or their reasons for advocating gun control.
Observe, the first category of liberal I mentioned, bleating out the message the second category of liberal has taught him.The main reason for controlling assault weapons is common sense and responsibility
The inevitable ad hom!but of course those motives are way beyond your reading level.
If you really know enough about firearms to determine which one's are dangerous, you need to start with some credibility, like actually knowing that there is no such thing as an "assault weapon" on the market.You don't know crap about liberals or their reasons for advocating gun control. The main reason for controlling assault weapons is common sense and responsibility, but of course those motives are way beyond your reading level.
I'm all for banning oozies. When was the last time it was used for anybody other then stick up kids?
Uzi's are fully automatic. You are like 30 years late on your calling for thier banning. :2wave:
Exactly, that's pretty much the same situation in South America if I'm not mistaken, the criminals(Cartels) are better armed than the public and law enforcement in those countries so of course they pretty much run the place.
There is? I havent seen that. May have to get one. Have a link?There is a semi auto version.
There is? I havent seen that. May have to get one. Have a link?
And even if so -- what about the AA12 makes it ineffective for use in any of the usual, legal things one might use a shotgun for?
Oh. I didnt see the context change. I thought you meant the AA12.
That, however doesnt mean you could not use it to hunt - you'd just need a smaller magazine.Hunting laws in Texas restrict the number of shells a shotgun can hold so the capicity of the AA12 would be wasted in that case.
There is a semi auto version.
Oh. I didnt see the context change. I thought you meant the AA12.
That, however doesnt mean you could not use it to hunt - you'd just need a smaller magazine.
So, your response doesnt really answer my question.
Not at all.kinda defeats the purpose of the weapon don't ya think?
Not at all.
At that point, the purpose of the weapon is to kill deer (or whatver). It is perfectly capable of doing so, regardless of how many rounds in the magazine.
Do that. While you -are- doing that, understand that in several states, you can ONLY hunt deer with a shotgun.I wouldn't recommend hunting dear with a shotgun and if I'm hunting duck I think I'll stick with a weapon that is designed with that in mind.
you got any evidence backing up YOUR claims? no, just opinion, and opinions are like assholes, they all stink.
Gun owners are not automatically gun nuts, but those who spout off specs of weapons the same way I would describe a woman's body are certainly getting excited about their guns.
Like I said, the viagra effect...:2razz:
how many weapons can you shoot at once? I suspect it is only 2, the number I have.
but somehow disagreeing with gun nuts makes me a prohibitionist?
The 2nd Amendment is all about guaranteeing that the people will have access to an effective means to kill other people, whenever killing those people might become necessary.It seems to me here that that most pro gun regulation types think that the second amendment exists for hunting and recreation purposes.
Happiness, is a warm gun. Bang. Bang. Shoot, shoot. :mrgreen:
There's just something about that hard, smooth, cold steel that just...turns.....me..... huhhh..uh..huhhhh.uhhh..huhhh....
<spurt.>
I am sorry to inform y'all, but our Constitutional rights only apply as long as the Government sees fit.
That is why you fail.
I think it's pretty clear that the hardcore firearms enthusiasts believe they need weapons for a pending overthrow of the government, and that "liberals" know that overthrow is coming and use "firearm regulation" to try to disarm the "patriots" before they can rise up. We really are on different planets.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?