With a quiet, almost unnoticed nomination just before Thanksgiving, President Barack Obama rewarded Media Matters for its help in attacking reporters and critics of the administration. At the same time, he virtually guaranteed that a federal agency that is supposed to improve the administration of elections will instead become a partisan battleground intended to help his political party.
On Nov. 19, the White House issued a press release announcing that it was withdrawing the nomination of Myrna Perez, a lawyer at the Brennan Center, to be a commissioner on the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). It instead nominated Matthew S. Butler, the former CEO and president of the George Soros-funded left-wing advocacy group Media Matters, to replace her....
The common characteristic of its new commissioners — and past commissioners like Paul DeGregorio or Donetta Davidson — has been that most of them were experienced election administrators at the state and local level, or at least election lawyers familiar with the federal and state election laws that apply to the administration of elections. That is a necessity given the EAC’s responsibility for helping improve the election process....
He [Butler] has been a leader and organizer of the progressive movement, and the head of Media Matters when it was acting as an unofficial PR wing of the White House and the Justice Department. As first reported in 2012 by Matthew Boyle, the administration was working with Media Matters “in an attempt to quell news stories about scandals plaguing [Eric] Holder and America’s top law enforcement agency,” including using Media Matters “to attack reporters” at Townhall, Breitbart, The Daily Caller, Fox News, and National Review....
The other three new commissioners on the EAC, in stark contrast to the former Media Matters CEO and president, actually have relevant election experience.
They include: Matthew Masterson, who worked for the Ohio secretary of State for three years and at the EAC for five years before that; Christy McCormick, a senior trial attorney in the Voting Section of the U.S. Department of Justice who also helped advise the Iraqi government on its new election system in 2009 and 2010; and Tom Hicks, the senior elections counsel for the Democratic minority at the House Administration Committee, the committee with jurisdiction over federal election laws.
W..... T...... H......
.....making our election process more partisan weakens the public trust in our system of representative government and represents a direct threat to our form of government. That is why we should utterly smash any election official or candidate found to be manipulating the vote - to not only disincentive it in the future, but to restore trust in the system. This is an incredibly bad appointment.
What's worse.....is that Butller left Media Matters back in April of 2013, so how this "rewards" Media Matters is beyond me, anymore than it rewards BTC, Friends of John Kerry or Chris Dodd.Happened a month ago.... How is this breaking?
President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts | The White House
What's worse.....is that Butller left Media Matters back in April of 2013, so how this "rewards" Media Matters is beyond me, anymore than it rewards BTC, Friends of John Kerry or Chris Dodd.
The Obama admin picked a successful progressive administrator.....it is the END OF THE WORLD!
Does Cpwill believe the Pope wears a funny hat?Is this another faux outrage?
Pjmedia....fair and balanced.Oh wait, they earlier had picked a republican administrator who the article actually praises....Damn that Obama for appointing people from both sides of the political spectrum, DAMN HIM!
W..... T...... H......
.....making our election process more partisan weakens the public trust in our system of representative government and represents a direct threat to our form of government. That is why we should utterly smash any election official or candidate found to be manipulating the vote - to not only disincentive it in the future, but to restore trust in the system. This is an incredibly bad appointment.
What's worse.....is that Butller left Media Matters back in April of 2013, so how this "rewards" Media Matters is beyond me, anymore than it rewards BTC, Friends of John Kerry or Chris Dodd.
The Obama admin picked a successful progressive administrator.....it is the END OF THE WORLD!
Since the nomination has to be approved by Congressional action, and given that the other 3 seats (which by law can only have 2 members of the same party) are unfilled....as is the Chairmanship....in an organization that was created by the GOP post 2000 Florida POTUS fiasco, I have a hard time seeing how this in any sense is the end of the world. But then again, I think it is more of a sign that some ex military posters have way too much time on their hands and really ought to put their time into more productive use.Well given the rarity of such a thing, you can see where some might see it as a sign of the end of the world. :2razz:
Is this another faux outrage?
The Divider in Chief awarding a partisan media organization for attacking his enemies to yet further political divide and angst? I'm surprised he didn't offer them the Medal of Freedom or nominate them for the Nobel Peace prize as well.
W..... T...... H......
.....making our election process more partisan weakens the public trust in our system of representative government and represents a direct threat to our form of government. That is why we should utterly smash any election official or candidate found to be manipulating the vote - to not only disincentive it in the future, but to restore trust in the system. This is an incredibly bad appointment.
W..... T...... H......
.....making our election process more partisan weakens the public trust in our system of representative government and represents a direct threat to our form of government. That is why we should utterly smash any election official or candidate found to be manipulating the vote - to not only disincentive it in the future, but to restore trust in the system. This is an incredibly bad appointment.
The Divider in Chief awarding a partisan media organization for attacking his enemies to yet further political divide and angst? I'm surprised he didn't offer them the Medal of Freedom or nominate them for the Nobel Peace prize as well.
W..... T...... H......
.....making our election process more partisan weakens the public trust in our system of representative government and represents a direct threat to our form of government. That is why we should utterly smash any election official or candidate found to be manipulating the vote - to not only disincentive it in the future, but to restore trust in the system. This is an incredibly bad appointment.
W..... T...... H......
.....making our election process more partisan weakens the public trust in our system of representative government and represents a direct threat to our form of government. That is why we should utterly smash any election official or candidate found to be manipulating the vote - to not only disincentive it in the future, but to restore trust in the system. This is an incredibly bad appointment.
First off, Butler has been gone from Media Matters for almost 2 years.
Also, he does in fact have relevant experience, despite the claims of the article, having run a presidential campaign for Chris Dodd and being involved in a number of other campaigns. That is what you would call hands on experience from the user side.
But the one that is the most amusing is that you rail against partisanship on the committy, and yet one of the people listed in your source article as a positive example is in fact a registered republican(Davidson). In fact, trying to get some one who is not partisan to some level in a position like this would be for all intents and purposes impossible.
The dude who wrote this garbage apparently doesn't know David Brock was the founder and CEO for all of its existence.
How exactly did Obama reward Media Matters? Did he reward republicans when he nominated a republican for the position?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?