- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Messages
- 25,893
- Reaction score
- 12,484
- Location
- New York, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
He may have promised to change Washington, but President Barack Obama is continuing one of its most renowned patronage traditions: bestowing prized ambassadorships on big donors.
Of the nearly 80 ambassadorship nominations or confirmations since Obama’s Inauguration, 56 percent were given to political appointees and 44 percent have gone to career diplomats, according to records kept by the American Foreign Service Association.
The latest nomination came this week, when Beatrice Wilkinson Welters was nominated to serve as ambassador to the island nation of Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean.
Welters, a longtime advocate for underprivileged children, and her husband, Anthony, an executive with UnitedHealth Group, generated between $200,000 and $500,000 in donations to Obama’s presidential campaign and an additional $100,000 for his Inauguration, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks political giving.
The Welters can be counted among the nearly two dozen Obama bundlers — fundraisers who together organized and solicited more than $10 million in donations during the 2008 campaign — who now are being dispatched to some of the world’s greatest cities.
Charles H. Rivkin, a Los Angeles-based children’s television executive and an $800,000 bundler, is in Paris; Alan Solomont, a Boston-based investor and $500,000 bundler, is in Madrid; Louis B. Susman, a Chicago investor and $500,000 bundler, is in London; and Don Beyer, a Virginia Volvo dealer and $745,000 bundler, is in Bern, Switzerland.
Nicole Avant, a member of a Motown family dynasty who is credited with bundling up to $800,000 for Obama, was granted the coveted and cushy ambassadorship in Nassau, Bahamas.
Obama never promised an end to the practice of ambassadorial patronage. In an appearance before his Inauguration, he said, “it would be disingenuous for me to suggest that there are not going to be some” political appointments.
But what has surprised some foreign policy experts is how traditionally Obama has defined the word “some”: Thus far, the president has not plucked a single career diplomat to fill a traditional political appointment.
Why is it every time something bad comes out about one party you have people who instead of saying why they did that or say yes that is wrong they always come back with the usual yeah but look what others have done responce. As long as Americans are willing to put up with this kind of nonsence from our leaders we dont deserve a better GOV. Lets keep playing the blame the other guy game and not demand more from out leaders.
Funny....how people really believed that Paul Bremer was actually qualified to be the Ambassador to Iraq..the guy was a freaking unqualified disaster.
Who's campaign did he donate to?
I would like to know why these Obama appointees are not qualified for the positions.
What are the chances the President or the VP are going to award his donors nobid war contracts?
What president has not awarded some of their qualified donors with government postitions of all sorts?
Why is the awarding this ambassadorship a bad thing? Is this person not qualified for the position?
Explain please the bad things that come with this appointment other than they apparently donated to Obama's campaign?
Obama and the people who contributed to his campaign including bundlers all won the election...He(the President) can appoint who ever he wants to appoint.
Funny....how people really believed that Paul Bremer was actually qualified to be the Ambassador to Iraq..the guy was a freaking unqualified disaster.
Who's campaign did he donate to?
I would like to know why these Obama appointees are not qualified for the positions.
What President in the past 40 years ran on a campaign focused around a "Change to Politics as Usual", a Change from political cronism, a Change from corruption and kick backs?
That's right, Barack Obama.
On things like this that is why Obama gets more critisism than others. He geared a LARGE portion of his campaign around complaining about this very type of thing, used these type of issues as a way to push his "Change" message and get people on board with him, and that's why this is a bigger issue for him. Its why him having lobbyists in his administration was a bigger issue. Its why executive orders for him was a bigger issue. Yes, they're things every President does...but they're things he specifically campaigned against and geared his campaign message around changing. As such, you can't say "well everyones done it" because that message is the very thing that helped get him elected.
some things never change.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?