- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41,104
- Reaction score
- 12,202
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Do some research, I'm not going to waste my time telling you what you can find out for yourself.
Directly taking on ISIS.
Obama's war didn't have to be: It is in large part a result of the president's wishful thinking approach to foreign policy. Why has the Islamic State been able to run amok defeating U.S.-trained Iraqi armies and capturing Iraqi cities; slaughtering, torturing, and persecuting thousands of innocent Christians, Yazidis, and Muslims; looting U.S. war materiel; making a mockery of our efforts in Iraq and threatening our consulates and embassies?
Because Obama ignored the Islamic State and played down their effectiveness in a vain effort to wish away the urgent need to remain on a war footing against terrorism.
Because he failed to engage with former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and that led to there being were no U.S. forces in Iraq that could have prevented the Inally slamic State's bursting out of Syria to take over large swaths of Iraq.
Because the president created a vacuum for terrorists in Syria when he didn't take the opportunity to back up his own demands that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad leave power but instead allowed the opposition to Assad to grow into a terrorist force that is now an army controlling territory in two countries.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1063803504 said:So you're saying his head is finally out of the sand?
That seems to be the context of the thread.
Expect Bitter Fruits From Obama's Half-Hearted War on Terror
Except that we both know that the context of the thread is wrong if that is the point...Obama is truly a weak President that no one takes seriously on the world stage anymore. This whole thing is just one big photo op to hopefully help in the upcoming election. Pity that our service members lives are on the line for something that self serving.
His aid to Africa is well known. He banned racial profiling, preserved the 2A, gave pension benefits to same sex couples....
Funding both sides of a war... yeah. I guess its fair for you to say I don't get it.
And I don't know about you, but I was much better off financially during the Bush economy, than during the six years of Obama. But I'm pretty sure that's Bush's fault.
He's taking on ISIS with a coalition which is indirect especially since he's claimed the US will not send in ground troops.
Yes after nearly 3,000 deaths and 7 months passing, Obama is finally seemingly getting serious about Ebola.
What exactly did Obama turn around? And yes, Obama is a wannabe dictator. His threat to carry out executive orders on everything Congress will not give him bears that out.
You are so blind of reality it's hard for me to even reply to you but... here goes.
Executive orders. No where near as many as Bush OR Clinton. You don't know what you are talking about. As far as what he turned around... Bush's ****ing trainwreck economy. Just pick a freegin' economic statistic and look it up.
Barack Obama left the annual United Nations meeting Thursday with his presidency reshaped by a new era of global turbulence and his worldview sharpened by global jihadism's "heart of darkness".
Read the article here: Obama leaves UN a changed statesman
The world has changed a lot in the last year and the USA and it's allies all over this planet have a lot of threats to deal with in the Middle East and in Europe and Africa.
The USA can't deal with all of those threats on its own, It will need the help of its allies.
What do you think?
Dude could cure cancer and personally pull you out of a burning house and you'd still whine about how he didn't do it right.
Dude could cure cancer and personally pull you out of a burning house and you'd still whine about how he didn't do it right.
Dude would LIE about curing cancer and personally pulling someone out of a burning house and I'd be right to criticize him for LYING. The man lies like the rest of us breathe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?