- Joined
- Dec 16, 2011
- Messages
- 83,794
- Reaction score
- 40,272
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
They had even fewer rights for being unlawful enemy combatants captured abroad. And they had no right whatever to an ordinary, Article III U.S. court. I agree that they should have been tried years ago, and any who were convicted of war crimes either imprisoned abroad or executed.
These Islamist mutts are lucky they were seen as possible sources of valuable information, or they would have had a hell of a lot more to worry about than whether a soldier held a German Shepherd in front of them, or splashed urine on their Koran. They could just have been given a quick drumhead trial and shot right where they were captured, if they couldn't explain why they were running around armed and out of uniform within shooting distance of our servicemen. That is exactly what the U.S. did to a number of English-speaking Germans who had concealed themselves in American uniforms (a war crime) that were captured during the Battle of the Bulge at the end of 1944. Standing these war criminals before a firing squad was so clearly within the laws of war that the U.S. Army even filmed the executions to document them.
Which nation were we at war with? What uniform would apply? I find is amusng that you would defend the torture we all were subjected to under GW Bush....
Let me take a walk down memory lane with you....