- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 88,714
- Reaction score
- 65,726
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Nation of laws people. Nation of laws.
Seeing as how you summarily rejected my initial proof because it consisted of "assertions from the west" (on a related note: Does that mean that the only acceptable piece of evidence for you would be a direct quote from a jihadist?), I'll go ahead and answer this logically (as opposed to the inane questions you asked).
The reason that Gitmo as a recruitment tool logically makes sense is that recruiters, while talking to potential recruits, might say something along the lines of, "The Americans are not your friends. Look at how they have locked up your brothers in that prison in Guantanemo Bay without so much as offering them a trial. Look at the photos of humiliation and torture which the Americans have done to your fellow Muslims. Come join us and avenge your fellow brothers."
Would a recruitment speech like that qualify as using Gitmo as a recruitment tool?
Nation of laws people. Nation of laws.
Not anymore. Not under the Obama administration.
You are the one here fighting to keep Gitmo open. You are here supporting a subversion of the law, so... Obama whine all you want but you are being a giant hypocrite.
How is GITMO a subversion of the law?
They are being detained in Cuba to subvert facing our laws. They are in our possession but because it's GITMO they are intentionally removed from jurisdiction to hide them from U.S. law. Thus the ability to make up **** with regards to those detainees. Hence... subversion of law.
What law?
You can start with the constitution Sixth Amendment.
There is also unlawful detention. You can't just detain someone without a charge, hold them indefinitely without trial and then deny them a lawyer on top of that.
These are rules that the US, as a nation of laws, provides.
Since when did we implement giving Constitutional rights to POWs?
Nation of laws.
Show the case law...since when did we start giving Constitutional rights to captured POWs??????????????????? Is there any precedent for that? Any case law? Hello McFly?
Enjoy the corner Ive backed you into.
We are a nation of laws. All you are doing is trying to find excuses to not apply the law to X people. Therefore you are for subverting the law.
Also, a POW is to be repatriated when the war is over and cannot be prosecuted for their soldierly acts. But we are in an indefinite undeclared war so... no war, no POW's.
Law is law.
Derp...."I can't understand that lots of other folks, who probably communicated this concept up the chain, also confirm that GITMO is in fact a tool for recruitment."
How does it make logical sense? How would going to prison indefinitely make one want to become a terrorist? Has GITMO ever been attacked? Did terrorism precede GITMO, or was it the other way around?
How in the HELL does it make logical sense?
The article you posted (without reading) contained zero proof of your assertion. It was simply theory.
1. Strawman argument.
2. They kill in the name of their prophet...not in the name of Gitmo exists. Hell, they scream the name of their God as they make their sickening slaughters of innocents.
Where is the evidence suggesting that this ridiculous assertion is even remotely true?
Since when did we implement giving Constitutional rights to POWs?
Terrorism preceded GITMO by many years. And there is no evidence that it was used as a "recruitment tool". Never has been. It's the opinion of people, and it may or may not be accurate, but for people to pretend it's been proven is just plain dishonest.
To be fair, Obama has tried...
The Obama administration is in the "final stages of drafting a plan to safely and responsibly" close the terrorist prison at Guantanamo Bay, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Wednesday.
"That has been something that our national security officials have been working on for quite some time...Continuing to operate that prison is not an effective use of our taxpayer resources, and it certainly is not consistent with our national security interests," Earnest said Wednesday.
Any plan would have to be approved by Congress, which has placed significant obstacles in the way of transferring detainees out of the prison.
Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, has opened the door in Congress for the administration to submit a plan to close the prison in exchange for tightening restrictions on transferring detainees abroad. But it's considered unlikely the measure will gain enough support from other Republicans to pass.
Obama in 'final stages' of planning the Gitmo closing - CNNPolitics.com
It is long past time to close Gitmo. It is used as a recruiting tool and creating more terrorists than it contains or stops. Hopefully Obama will be able to fulfill a political promise that has been on hold since day one.
This and the Iranian nuclear deal, Obama's two chief FP successes.
As I asked WVU (who responded and yet still did not answer the question), what would qualify as "proof" that Gitmo has been used a recruitment tool?