- Joined
- Jul 9, 2008
- Messages
- 30,277
- Reaction score
- 17,796
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
The great thing about these debates is that much of the reaction against a name change is beyond ridiculous. They practically act as though life will never go on and it won't be the same. Whiners, please. They said that about North Dakota, and despite the utterly protracted debate, my alma mater changed its name. People still go to games, life moves on, and they ended up doing better fiscally as a result!
I say if the movement to remove the name gets popular enough, switch the name, change up the logo. It can't hurt. Sports fans move on, create new chants, buy new gear, and life goes on.
Furthermore, I hope to God they don't use the "it's a symbol of pride and respect for Natives" excuse. If and when it becomes clear that the community being honored largely does not feel that way, its supposed respect becomes moot. My alma mater used that excuse for years (even promoting it during the games), but eventually it grew thin, and the administration knew it.
I say if the movement to remove the name gets popular enough, switch the name, change up the logo. It can't hurt. Sports fans move on, create new chants, buy new gear, and life goes on.
Furthermore, I hope to God they don't use the "it's a symbol of pride and respect for Natives" excuse. If and when it becomes clear that the community being honored largely does not feel that way, its supposed respect becomes moot. My alma mater used that excuse for years (even promoting it during the games), but eventually it grew thin, and the administration knew it.
Last edited: