Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership - Bloomberg Politics
President Obama: "It's somewhat ironic seeing some members of Congress wanting to make common cause with the hardliners in Iran..... It's an unlikely coalition."
Interesting. Seems to me, the President distorts the issue for political gain and is subtly trying to claim that Republicans are fraternizing with the enemy or perhaps even treasonous. And yet no reaction or condemnation from Democrats or their friends in the media. Rudy Guilliani states that he believes that President Obama doesn't love his country and all hell breaks lose, the full force of the Democrat party and their media puppets attacking with all force. But when the shoe is on the other foot, again the attack is on the Republican party and the Democrat media protects their saviour and master.
Interesting. Also, isn't President Obama trying to 'make common cause with the hardliners in Iran" through the deal negotiations he's involved in?
Obama Blasts Republicans Over Letter to Iranian Leadership - Bloomberg Politics
President Obama: "It's somewhat ironic seeing some members of Congress wanting to make common cause with the hardliners in Iran..... It's an unlikely coalition."
Interesting. Seems to me, the President distorts the issue for political gain and is subtly trying to claim that Republicans are fraternizing with the enemy or perhaps even treasonous. And yet no reaction or condemnation from Democrats or their friends in the media. Rudy Guilliani states that he believes that President Obama doesn't love his country and all hell breaks lose, the full force of the Democrat party and their media puppets attacking with all force. But when the shoe is on the other foot, again the attack is on the Republican party and the Democrat media protects their saviour and master.
Interesting. Also, isn't President Obama trying to 'make common cause with the hardliners in Iran" through the deal negotiations he's involved in?
... lets add one more very relevant act by a liberal Senator that should shut them up for good.
According to Pajamas Media columnist Michael Ledeen, in 2008, a Democratic senator sent a personal emissary to Tehran encouraging the mullahs not to sign an agreement with the outgoing Bush Administration as negotiations would take on a much friendlier tone following President Bush’s departure from office.
Senator Obama's 2008 Message to Iran Undermines Condemnation of GOP Letter - Breitbart
The actual strategy is detente first, and then a full alliance with Iran throughout the Middle East and North Africa. It has been on display since before the beginning of the Obama administration. During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Mr. Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran to assure the mullahs that he was a friend of the Islamic Republic, and that they would be very happy with his policies. The secret channel was Ambassador William G. Miller, who served in Iran during the shah’s rule, as chief of staff for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and as ambassador to Ukraine. Ambassador Miller has confirmed to me his conversations with Iranian leaders during the 2008 campaign.
Obama’s Latest Big Lie: ‘We Have No Strategy’ | Faster, Please!
Here is the author of the above discussing this back channel communication with Mark Levin.
Information found through The Conservative Treehouse.
2008 Candidate Senator Obama Sent U.S. Secret Emissary To Iran Telling Them Not To Negotiate With George Bush – Said Wait For Him To Be Elected…. | The Last Refuge
Obama should have blasted himself.
All countries commit war crimes during war, stop acting like your **** doesn't stink. It's the hypocrisy.
The body counts are simply too complicated to analyze because most deaths, and who caused them, go unreported. Keep in mind this is a war zone in Iraq, a country not known for its efficiency with paperwork.All you had to do was look at the body count chart to see that the after math of troop withdrawal wasn't nearly as bloody as it was before.
Where do you find the credibility problem?Sorry but I don't really consider the CNS a credible source.
That.s untrue and if you have a problem with the credibility of CNS then you should sign off from whoever told you that whopper. In fact you should keep in mind that Saddam Hussein was a terrorist regime.Are you aware that there weren't any terrorists in Iraq before the invasion....but because of the war now there are?
Does it really need to be explained again that Obama called Iraq a success? Perhaps you can watch him mouth the words himself and understand what actually happened. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKSb2ukQxvYBush still gets the credit for the invasion that opened the can of worms we now call ISIS.
Obama should have blasted himself.
The letter to Iran was very misguided and should have been sent to the WH instead, or at best, it could have been a simple statement coming from Congress, to be observed by Iran. Surely they are watching. Right?
And they are watching now, seeing a POTUS making a fool of himself while criticizing those he reprimands for having made fools of themselves.
What a conceded man he is
Shame?Dear Lord. Mark Levin!!!!!! Have you no shame??
Where's the problem? We know Obama said he was going to be more 'flexible' with Putin after the election. Why not the same with Iran? Certainly withdrawing the troops from the Middle East didn't result in any Iranian protests.Dear Lord. Mark Levin!!!!!! Have you no shame??
The Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima weren't " war crimes ".
Your butt hurt over America's existence is AGAIN, compromising your ability to make rational rebuttals.
Maybe if you picked up a History book once in a while instead of obsessing over America you wouldn't make such ridiculous dim whitted assertions.
Where's the problem? We know Obama said he was going to be more 'flexible' with Putin after the election. Why not the same with Iran? Certainly withdrawing the troops from the Middle East didn't result in any Iranian protests.
Shame?
For what?
He isn't the focus of the information.
The columnist's (Michael Ledeen) conversation with Ambassador William G. Miller and what he did on Obama's behalf is.
But way to try and deflect away from the provided information.
:thumbs:
:doh
So you responded to the Levin clip without understanding what was on it? There is a pattern here.I was speaking of the great one, not Obama.
So you responded to the Levin clip without understanding what was on it? There is a pattern here.
Actually you made a comment about the poster, saying this.No......follow nice and slowly, I made a comment about Levin, that's it....., nothing more. I don't know what you're trying to see in that.
That is clearly unprovable and a foolishly wild speculation. The fact is that the real problems began once the troops were removed and that is not debatable..
It's basic logic that many had to foresight to predict before Bush invaded. And the troops were always going be to removed. There was too much unwelcomeness for anything else. Thing for a moment. There had to be some acceptance of us for this to be like other occupations. We never had that and never would. There was no way around this.
Actually you made a comment about the poster, saying this.
"Dear Lord. Mark Levin!!!!!! Have you no shame??"
So you don't know what Mark Levin had to say and yet you questioned whether the poster has any shame? There is definitely a pattern here.
It's basic logic that many had to foresight to predict before Bush invaded. And the troops were always going be to removed. There was too much unwelcomeness for anything else. Thing for a moment. There had to be some acceptance of us for this to be like other occupations. We never had that and never would. There was no way around this.
Thus is not unusual. There are US Military bases spread around the world, many since WWII, and all with SOFA agreements.Let the DOD planners, the guys that retire to defense contractor jobs tell it, and we should have kept a residual force in Iraq indefinitely, lol. :roll:
Thus is not unusual. There are US Military bases spread around the world, many since WWII, and all with SOFA agreements.
All DoD planners assumed a robust residual US force remaining indefinitely.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?