- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
If Obama wanted to end the war in Iraq, as he claimed repeatedly that he did, and said that the war was a success, that "We knew this day would come. We've known it for some time. But still there is something profound about the end of a war that has lasted so long," said Obama. "It's harder to end a war than begin one. Everything that American troops have done in Iraq - all the fighting, all the dying, the bleeding and the building and the training and the partnering, all of it has landed to this moment of success."Again you repeat that same fairytale, Bush wanted a long term agreement like we have with South Korea but the Iraqi's would have none of it and would not agree to any open ended occupation. He struggled to get even the 3 year agreement before his U.N. sanctioned occupation time was up. As far as dead we need to count the Sunnis that Maliki's Shia militias murdered as well. The choice of supporting a sectarian terrorist while he commits genocide or following through with the agreement that Bush signed was probably not that difficult given that the Iraqi's wanted us out badly anyway.
Barack Obama declares Iraq war a success President told an audience of soldiers at Fort Bragg that the final pullout after nearly nine years of conflict is a 'historic' moment
Chris McGreal in Washington
....But the president, who came to power promising to end the war, said that for all the suffering, the result was success.
No, Obama did not declare the Iraq War a success. He said the sum of what the troops did in Iraq was "a moment of success" not that the entire Iraq War or the surge was a success....
"We knew this day would come. We've known it for some time. But still there is something profound about the end of a war that has lasted so long," said Obama. "It's harder to end a war than begin one. Everything that American troops have done in Iraq - all the fighting, all the dying, the bleeding and the building and the training and the partnering, all of it has landed to this moment of success."
false choice.
If we'd have taken out Assad as well ISIS would have spread wider and faster in Syria and probably further due to the lack of resistance.
I just quoted your link. :roll:
there are more factions at play than just Assad and ISIS.
If we'd have taken out Assad as well ISIS would have spread wider and faster in Syria and probably further due to the lack of resistance.
A helluva lot more. You are right. But the guy I addressed seemed to be pushing the whole "Obama should've taken out Assad" angle.
The window of opportunity in Syria was early 2012. The Assad regime was on the defensive, opposition morale was high, the secular rebels were in charge and ISIS had not yet formed. During that window we did nothing.
ISIS...
Foundation of the group (1999–2006)
Following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Jordanian Salafi Jihadist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and his militant group Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad, founded in 1999, achieved notoriety in the early stages of the Iraqi insurgency for the suicide attacks on Shia Islamic mosques, civilians, Iraqi government institutions and Italian soldiers partaking in the U.S.-led 'Multi-National Force'.
You don't know what you are talking about.
And completely neutralized by 2009. The departure of US forces from Iraq in 2011 and the vacuum in Syria from mid 2012 onward created the opportunity for ISIS to form.
Salafi Jihadist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and his militant group Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad, founded in 1999? This was the precursor of ISIS, right?Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaISIS...
Foundation of the group (1999–2006)
Following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Jordanian Salafi Jihadist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and his militant group Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad, founded in 1999, achieved notoriety in the early stages of the Iraqi insurgency for the suicide attacks on Shia Islamic mosques, civilians, Iraqi government institutions and Italian soldiers partaking in the U.S.-led 'Multi-National Force'.
You don't know what you are talking about.
:spin:
You don't know what you are talking about.
One of us has been to Iraq. I know that war and that area quite a bit better than you.
Then why do you have such a hard time backing up all this stuff you are making up? All talk... no links. Sorry that when I bring facts to back up my points that it destroys yours. But that's what links are for. BTW... What makes you think you know where I've been and haven't? More Jack fabricated speculation I suppose?
Your link provides perfectly valid information but it's not relevant or useful. After Zarqawi was killed and after the 2007-2008 surge, the Sunni extremists were in retreat. They did not reconstitute until 2012, using Syria as a safe haven and rally point.
This is an excellent opportunity for you to contradict him with your own set of facts!I invite you to back up anything you say.
This is an excellent opportunity for you to contradict him with your own set of facts!
I did. And he just keeps spamming with no supportive links. Direct your ire towards him if you care about the need for supporting facts in an argument.
I invite you to back up anything you say.
LOL Who cares what they said?cpwill said:unny, then how two different Secretaries of Defense for the Obama Administration who were directly involved seem to remember that differently
Wrong. BHO kept lowering the projected residual force level until it was no longer worth the political effort for the Iraqis.
I invite you to back up anything you say.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?