Again... The plans are pretty flexible, and give the states a great deal of latitude. NG will almost certainly be acceptable. And no, no one is going to ban wood stoves.Hello my name is Barak Obama, I'm here for your Coal, your Wood Stoves, Your Natural Gas Pipelines, your oil rigs & oh your prices will necessarily skyrocket!
Sorry, wrong. The price of solar has been dropping steadily since the 1970s. The more renewables we develop and use, the more economies of scale will kick in, and the more efficient the units become.You can still use cleean energy of course but the price to manufacture the solar panel will go up because of the emissions it will cause....
How to Use Solar Energy at Night - Scientific Americanof course you'll only get "some" energy when the sun shines
Please. Look at the Fortune 500. Exxon Mobil = #2, Chevron is #3, Phillips #6, Valero #10, Marathon #25, Conoco #47, Occidental #116.... And let's not forget how BP handled its recent massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The idea that it's the renewable investors and companies who are the "greedy bastards" is a patently absurd claim.IMO the people behind this Global warming scam are some of the most ruthless greedy bastards this country has ever produced. Look at Algore as one example.
Even the US Chamber of Commerce, which is a Republican think tank, doesn't make such extravagant claims. They say it'll cost the US economy $50 billion a year; compared to a $15 trillion annual GDP, that's nothing. Spare us the hyperbole.So then when the price to heat your home is so high you have to resort to burning wood to keep from freezing do we then see the EPA send a Gestapo team to come & rip the stove out of your wall? Maybe now you can see why these Federal Gestapo teams are arming up. They dont expect people will willfully go along with all this crap.
Its all about destroying america period.
If it were truly a "market-based solution," why do we need politicians to "get on board?"On CO2, the right wingers had their chance. They had ample opportunity to get on board with a market-based solution, modeled after the system used to reduce lead content in gasoline and sulfur dioxide emissions.
If it were truly a "market-based solution," why do we need politicians to "get on board?"
"Get out of the way" seems more appropriate.
Even the US Chamber of Commerce, which is a Republican think tank, doesn't make such extravagant claims. They say it'll cost the US economy $50 billion a year; compared to a $15 trillion annual GDP, that's nothing. Spare us the hyperbole.
Obama administration to announce controversial emissions cap on power plants | Fox News
He's been talking about the war on coal for some time, now it's going into affect.
225k jobs lost :shock:..... cut 30% emissions by 2030. :roll: Stretching out that decade thought process huh? One thing is for certain.....we will have to flip over anything Obama touched once we take the Presidency in 2016. Anything he touched and removing all who are associated to him.
We Energies will be required to pay $50,000 in penalties and forfeitures to settle allegations that the utility’s natural gas-fired power plant in Kenosha County violated air pollution regulations.
The guy is an economic terrorist... This doesn't set a cap on anything but wealth and puts the control of energy in the hands of the government.
I suppose you prefer pollution dumped in your yard.
Obama administration to announce controversial emissions cap on power plants | Fox News
He's been talking about the war on coal for some time, now it's going into affect.
Wouldn't it be great if he announced an all out war on welfare leeches rather that coal. But they be his peoples...
Yesw, he could start with those very corporations first, since you're calling people leeches .Wouldn't it be great if he announced an all out war on welfare leeches rather that coal. But they be his peoples...
There is no war on coal.He's been talking about the war on coal for some time, now it's going into affect.
Yesw, he could start with those very corporations first, since you're calling people leeches .
The president is our countries worst enemy.
No, I just know the government is bull**** and that democrats (and republicans as well) love to regulate the economy or attack certain industries through regulations, while people like you spew what you just spewed.
You think the government is looking out for your best interests?
If dumping nuclear waste in peoples backyards was fashionable the government would support it despite the fact nuclear waste is toxic.
These clowns aren't here to help you - they're in politics to pander to the idiots and keep their power base. They're textbook narcissists.
Yesw, he could start with those very corporations first, since you're calling people leeches .
Deuce said:Yes, keep on copping out of real argument. Spamming "GOVERNMENT BAD" is not an argument in favor of carbon emissions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?