- Joined
- Sep 25, 2005
- Messages
- 15,675
- Reaction score
- 2,979
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
btw: Is this the "better things you have to do"? :lamo:
No. I did something in between that was "better." :2wave:
btw: Is this the "better things you have to do"? :lamo:
This is the problem: Americans feel entitled. I would suggest you come to the realization that you are just one large sensory organ like everyone else.
Barack takes a bow
In a shocking display of fealty to a foreign potentate, President Obama bowed to Saudi King Abdullah at the Group of 20 summit in London last week.
Mr. Obama later said in Strasbourg, France, "We have to change our behavior in showing the Muslim world greater respect." Symbolism is important in world affairs. By bending over to show greater respect to Islam, the U.S. president belittled the power and independence of the United States.
The bow was an extraordinary protocol violation. Such an act is a traditional obeisance befitting a king's subjects, not his peer. There is no precedent for U.S. presidents bowing to Saudi or any other royals. Former President Franklin D. Roosevelt shook hands with Saudi King Abdulaziz in February 1945. Granted, Mr. Roosevelt was wheelchair-bound, but former President Dwight D. Eisenhower shook hands when he first met King Saud in January 1957. Mr. Obama's bow to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques does not help his image with those who believe he is secretly a Muslim, and why he chose to bow only to the Saudi King and not to any other royals remains unexplained.
No Americans of any station are required to bow to royalty.
Moderator's Warning: |
![]() |
Bow?
An American?
To royalist scum?
How shameful.
Yet, his wife assualted the Queen of England.
King Abdullah isn't "scum" and this may have been a gaffe, but jeeze, let's let it be. Putting your arm around someone isn't "assault" and the queen did it back, even though it might have been a breach of protocol.
I don't agree with his policies, but Barack is generally improving our image abroad. Whereas Bush's trips to Europe would be greeted with flag burnings and anti-American rhetoric, Obama is garnering respect. Let's give him credit where it's due instead of focusing on his gaffes.
Royalty are scum. Their ancestors were gangsters that stole wealth and privelege and their descendants are the undeserving heirs to their gangster heritage.
The president's name is "Obama", one doesn't refer to president's by their first name.
Obama embarassed the hell out of thte US by his apologetic ass-kissing antics overseas.
He doesn't deserve any credit for being a national embarassment. What's next, the Canoe Trip and the Killer Rabbit?
Royalty are scum. Their ancestors were gangsters that stole wealth and privelege and their descendants are the undeserving heirs to their gangster heritage.
So just to check....
![]()
![]()
Scum
![]()
Scum
Right?
ahh so this is how its going to be....
So because you lied about one of my positions in a gun thread, then threatened me in pm that you were going to start behaving this way in calling me dishonest when ever you can cackle it, one can assume it is more important for you to be "right" whether you are or not you actually are, than for the health of these forums.
You get what you give. bring it on.
show me how I was lying. you in another thread had bad grammar, should i go back there and claim that you were lying?
you are a hyper-partisan selective poster. you went after one for hyperpartisanism, you thanked another poster for complaining about said poster, then ignored it when she did the SAME EXACT THING.
Why don't you try to show some integrity man.
right, you have a lot of sand you can go pound before you get one! :thumbs:
Please lets not pretend to be obtuse. thanks.
Did us Bush dislikers look this petty?
Oh, Mr. Vicchio made this poll ... that explains everything about its unfairness.
No, I did NOT make this poll, I have no clue where it came from. Sorry kiddo to disappoint you there but you are WRONG.
Try showing some integrity and admit you were either wrong or you lied. I showed how I did not thank the post that you claimed I did. So which is it, Reverend? Were you wrong, or did you lie? Please tell us.
And I will tell you again. I will call you out when you post dishonestly. If you do not like it, stop doing iit.
You started this. You want to stop it, you know what you need to do. You'll get what you give, Reverend.
Take responsibility, Reverend. You started it. You can end it.
Guess you can't.
Based on your public warning in the other thread for a similar post to this I made, I will not respond and have simply reported it.
I will not take your bait. sorry.
This is so funny.
Obama maybe bows... uproar..
Bush kisses and holds hands... not a peep....
Classic right wing hypocrisy.
But, Pete, holding hands does not show submissiveness.
:roll:
This is so funny.
Obama maybe bows... uproar..
Bush kisses and holds hands... not a peep....
Classic right wing hypocrisy.
You two hyper-partisans really need a better line of attack, all you are doing is making them ignant hilly billies look more cultured than you two. :lol:
Bowing is an insult to Allah in Islam
Holding hands and kissing as a greeting is a custom.
See the difference?
Bowing is an insult to Allah in Islam
Hmmm it seems that people on the far right the ones that think all Muslims are terrorist would actually like that but wait Obama "libural":lol:
Thank you... You could also call Obama as being a 'paid-for' tool of the big bankers, among other much more damning things that Obama's done.
Just drop this one, it's petty and there's already PLENTY in which to be pissed off with Obama that you can still be partisan (too bad for all the meaty things going against Obama, you probably won't want to touch because it applied to Bush, Clinton, Bush, and so on....)