• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NYT: We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives

Why does anyone swallow M$M/Big Pharma 💩 Covid info?... Same with dummies who swallowed/swallow M$M/MIC 💩 info about Vietnam, Iraq, Iran, IZrael, Russia, Venezuela, etc. ad nau$eam... ugh....
 
Let's be clear: Scientists were unsure whether the virus came from a wet market or leaked from the lab in Wuhan. Eventually it was found to have leaked from the lab in Wuhan. There never was much controversy about that except in the minds of MAGA.

What MAGA kept trying to say, or imply, is that the virus was genetically engineered in the lad in Wuhan. This is false.
 
Let's be clear: Scientists were unsure whether the virus came from a wet market or leaked from the lab in Wuhan. Eventually it was found to have leaked from the lab in Wuhan. There never was much controversy about that except in the minds of MAGA.

What MAGA kept trying to say, or imply, is that the virus was genetically engineered in the lad in Wuhan. This is false.
This is wrong. Evidence points to zoonotic origin.
 
They will never apologize just like the big pharma shills that still claim Covid was zoonotic.

 
Health officials downplayed data on natural immunity, misrepresented study, never updated findings

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in August 2021 that vaccines offered greater protection than a previous COVID-19 infection, officials cited a study that never included any such conclusion.

In fact, the study that CDC guidance was based upon only focused on the effects of vaccination following a COVID-19 infection, meaning in those that had already developed antibodies to the virus. Instead, the CDC touted it as data supporting vaccination without mentioning prior infections, a serious flaw in medical "science."

Nonetheless, the message that vaccines provided superior protection became a common refrain regarding all protection from COVID. Newly released documents from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit show that documents reveal that senior health officials received new information shortly after their August 2021 declaration about an early pandemic study from Israel that came to an entirely different conclusion.
 
Health officials downplayed data on natural immunity, misrepresented study, never updated findings

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in August 2021 that vaccines offered greater protection than a previous COVID-19 infection, officials cited a study that never included any such conclusion.

In fact, the study that CDC guidance was based upon only focused on the effects of vaccination following a COVID-19 infection, meaning in those that had already developed antibodies to the virus. Instead, the CDC touted it as data supporting vaccination without mentioning prior infections, a serious flaw in medical "science."

Nonetheless, the message that vaccines provided superior protection became a common refrain regarding all protection from COVID. Newly released documents from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit show that documents reveal that senior health officials received new information shortly after their August 2021 declaration about an early pandemic study from Israel that came to an entirely different conclusion.

Tell us how well natural immunity worked on the first death by COVID Omicron variation.
 
Back
Top Bottom