• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Numbers for future reference [W:430]

now you are just nit picking about nonsense. I know what I said and again you are trying to weasel your way around it.

So again I am dismissing you out of hand. Don't know what you are not getting about that.

Words count. Facts matter. If your words have no meaning then so be it. Bring up the quote and we will see if I am right.
 
If you want to believe they are all the same I have no problem with that. This again does not back up your claims on gun control in any way.

You lose.

At least my words matter
 
What part of "dismissing you out of hand" do I need to explain in detail?

Facts matter. You made a claim and it was factually incorrect and you can't admit it. You have lost all credibility
 
Facts matter. You made a claim and it was factually incorrect and you can't admit it. You have lost all credibility

No. I backed up my claim as others have supported as well as my evidence. You said name one, I named two and you tried to move the goalposts. Then to top it off, it has nothing to do with the topic as you are just trying to weasel around your position on gun control because you know it is indefensible. You have posted proof of nothing and are at this point just posting butthurt nonsense.

Like I said, dismissed.
 
No. I backed up my claim as others have supported as well as my evidence. You said name one, I named two and you tried to move the goalposts. Then to top it off, it has nothing to do with the topic as you are just trying to weasel around your position on gun control because you know it is indefensible. You have posted proof of nothing and are at this point just posting butthurt nonsense.

Like I said, dismissed.

Post your quote. I will embarrass you again. Why are you lying.? Do you want me to post the exact quote ....again?
 
Post your quote. I will embarrass you again. Why are you lying.? Do you want me to post the exact quote ....again?

Again Dismissed. The only thing embarrassing os your incessant nagging at this point. It's like watching a toddler running around yelling mine, mine.

Please feel free to post it. Will not change my argument of the FACT you are wrong.

Dismissed.
 
IN a court of law, mine would be admissible. Yours-not a chance in hell

Actually I have testified in a court of law as an expert witness in mental health cases.....have you? You are out of your league on this one counselor
 
Again Dismissed. The only thing embarrassing os your incessant nagging at this point. It's like watching a toddler running around yelling mine, mine.

Please feel free to post it. Will not change my argument of the FACT you are wrong.

Dismissed.

You are factually incorrect. The state can detain someone for as long as they are suicidal in every state in the union. Anyone else want to join him and claim that statement is wrong?
 
Actually I have testified in a court of law as an expert witness in mental health cases.....have you? You are out of your league on this one counselor

Considering TD was a lawyer at one point, I doubt he's out of his league. This is kinda his element.
 
Considering TD was a lawyer at one point, I doubt he's out of his league. This is kinda his element.

Is he a mental health expert with three decades of experience? I am
 
Actually I have testified in a court of law as an expert witness in mental health cases.....have you?

Yes I have, for more than 30 years. In fact President Ronald Reagan consulted with me on the nation's mental health situation.

You are out of your league on this one counselor

I am sorry did I mention I was a judge counselor? In family court.

I was also a rock star, rodeo astronaut.

So you are the one who is way out of your league.
 
You are factually incorrect. The state can detain someone for as long as they are suicidal in every state in the union.

No they can't. Not without due process, so I know that is a bull**** lie. Again that is irrelevant and off topic. So stop.

Anyone else want to join him and claim that statement is wrong?

They already have.
 
Yes I have, for more than 30 years. In fact President Ronald Reagan consulted with me on the nation's mental health situation.



I am sorry did I mention I was a judge consular? In family court.

I was also a rock star, rodeo astronaut.

So you are the one who is way out of your league.
Hilarious. Now you add lying to your lack of credibility. oooh wait....I have to save these posts
 
No they can't. Not without due process, so I know that is a bull**** lie. Again that is relevant and off topic. So stop.



They already have.

You never mentioned due process in your claim. No you do because I have taught you. You are hilarious
 
Hilarious. Now you add lying to your lack of credibility. oooh wait....I have to save these posts

Prove I am lying?
Prove I am not being sarcastic?

So you can save them all you like. It makes your argument no less off topic and wrong.
 
Prove I am lying?
Prove I am not being sarcastic?

So you can save them all you like. It makes your argument no less off topic and wrong.
Oh I will. Keep them coming.
 
You never mentioned due process in your claim. No you do because I have taught you. You are hilarious

So you can save them all you like. It makes your argument no less off topic and wrong. I will put an end to your nonsense right now...

Oh god, not "gum" homicide! Violet Beauregarde, might have something to say about that! j/k lol.


Yes and we have plenty of laws in place. Some are good like background checks. Some were and still are just feel good nonsense that disarms law abiding citizens. Like the disastrous assault weapons ban. Had no effect on crime at all, zero. Instead of making more useless laws, let's enforce the ones we have and make the punishment fit the crime.

We only detain for a limited amount of time for observation. Unless they commit themselves we can't hold them without due process. So it's again not a crime.

All that nonsense you have been spouting, that has got to hurt.
 
Last edited:
Prove I am lying?
Prove I am not being sarcastic?

So you can save them all you like. It makes your argument no less off topic and wrong. I will put an end to your nonsense right now...

Are you claiming that is your original quote? Why are you lying?
 
Are you claiming that is your original quote? Why are you lying?

This is my original quote on that particular off topic nonsense.

We only detain for a limited amount of time for observation. Unless they commit themselves we can't hold them without due process. So it's again not a crime.

We can see who the liar is.
 
This is my original quote on that particular off topic nonsense.



We can see who the liar is.
This is your original quote.

You cannot be detained until you are not suicidal in most states. In most states you be be held for observation for 72 hours or less unless you commit yourself. Close relatives can go to court to have you committed in some cases, again this requires due process.


Close relatives have nothing to do with the process. You confused incapacitation with commitment. You are flat out wrong
 
This is your original quote.

You cannot be detained until you are not suicidal in most states. In most states you be be held for observation for 72 hours or less unless you commit yourself. Close relatives can go to court to have you committed in some cases, again this requires due process.

Close relatives have nothing to do with the process. You confused incapacitation with commitment. You are flat out wrong

That is not my original statement. This is...

We only detain for a limited amount of time for observation. Unless they commit themselves we can't hold them without due process. So it's again not a crime.

There is a time stamp on the post of 07-08-17, 01:17 PM

The quote you are trying to take out of context and say dishonestly is my original quote came much later...

You cannot be detained until you are not suicidal in most states. In most states you be be held for observation for 72 hours or less unless you commit yourself. Close relatives can go to court to have you committed in some cases, again this requires due process.

Well what do you consider "more effective?"

Notice the timestamp 07-08-17, 02:20 PM A little over an hour LATER. Since I had already mentioned due process initially, I did not think I had to mention it again and again and again as I have had to. Then YOU try and say I learned it from you? LMAO!

You never mentioned due process in your claim. No you do because I have taught you. You are hilarious

So no. I am done with your silly dishonest nonsense.

You lose on all fronts my friend.

Good night.
 
Last edited:
That is not my original statement. This is...



There is a time stamp on the post of 07-08-17, 01:17 PM

The quote you are trying to take out of context and say dishonestly is my original quote came much later...



Notice the timestamp 07-08-17, 02:20 PM A little over an hour LATER. Since I had already mentioned due process initially, I did not think I had to mention it again and again and again as I have had to. Then YOU try and say I learned it from you? LMAO!



So no. I am done with your silly dishonest nonsense.

You lose on all fronts my friend.

Good night.

Dude. You are freaking hilarious
 
Back
Top Bottom