Nonsense or traipsing close to the truth?

[Chock Full o Nuts]

You sure use a lot of words to say essentially nothing!

It's the alternate lyrics to...

 

[Lisa]

And the truth will set you free!

Says the person who believes in 182 genders, hahaha.

There are 2-3 biological sexes (male, female and intersex), 4-5 sexual orientations, ( heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, asexual and pansexual) and 5-7 gender identities. (male, female, NB, gender fluid, demigirl, demiboy)


What else do you claim that I believe in?

 

[Chock Full o Nuts]

There are 2-3 biological sexes (male, female and intersex), 4-5 sexual orientations, ( heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, asexual and pansexual) and 5-7 gender identities. (male, female, NB, gender fluid, demigirl, demiboy)

But what are the possible combinations?

 

[devildavid]

Some of the OP is related to quantum physics which indicates that reality is not defined until it is observed. That part is an interesting topic for discussion.

No, that is the incorrect view of quantum physics. It doesn’t indicate that.

 

[devildavid]

Physics probably also looks like gibberish to you. It isn't your fault you aren't capable of comprehending complicated subject matter.

You have not demonstrated an understanding of physics in the OP.

 

[grip]

You sure use a lot of words to say essentially nothing!

If you think that about two small paragraphs summing up a lot of theory, then don't read Hawkings or Wheeler on their views about physics.

 

[grip]

You have not demonstrated an understanding of physics in the OP.

Says the poster who shows squat to refute any of it.

What else do you claim that I believe in?

Don't know, don't care. I'm sure it's all pure genius.

 

[Lisa]

Says the poster who shows squat to refute any of it.

You can't refute a delusion. You can only treat it.

Don't know, don't care. I'm sure it's all pure genius.

That sounds like a personal issue.

 

[grip]

You can't refute a delusion. You can only treat it.

Then you're in trouble.

That sounds like a personal issue.

For you it is.

 

[grip]

Only a couple of posters have even offered to comment on the material and conjectures, the rest have just been personal insults to show off their pathetic egos.

 

[Lisa]

Then you're in trouble.

Your OP is incoherent mental masturbation. Its not science and its neither existentialism or metaphysics. It might sound impressive to the untrained mind but its just a collection of rambling words to those of us who understand physics and philosophy.

For you it is.

Believe what you want to believe. Not my problem.

BTW, What are the claimed 150 genders that I didn't mention in #27? You made the claim so you get to defend it.

 

[Daisy]

Only a couple of posters have even offered to comment on the material and conjectures, the rest have just been personal insults to show off their pathetic egos.

I'll be the 1st to admit, I don't really understand what you are trying to convey...

 

[grip]

Your OP is incoherent mental masturbation. Its not science and its neither existentialism or metaphysics. It might sound impressive to the untrained mind but its just a collection of rambling words to those of us who understand physics and philosophy.



Believe what you want to believe. Not my problem.

BTW, What are the claimed 150 genders that I didn't mention in #27? You made the claim so you get to defend it.

The clueless arrogance in your statements is beyond astounding. Your comments are far more delusional than anything I've said.

 

[grip]

I'll be the 1st to admit, I don't really understand what you are trying to convey...

That the energy that created humanity expresses itself thru us since it is not finite but we are.

 

[Lisa]

The clueless arrogance in your statements is beyond astounding. Your comments are far more delusional than anything I've said.

Coming from you that is great compliment. Thank you.

 

[watsup]

If you think that about two small paragraphs summing up a lot of theory, then don't read Hawkings or Wheeler on their views about physics.

Then what is this doing in this particular forum? Go find the science forum.

 

[watsup]

That the energy that created humanity expresses itself thru us since it is not finite but we are.

Yet more nonsense blather. Does Hawking agree with this, or were you using his name in vain?

 

[grip]

Coming from you that is great compliment. Thank you.

You just keep living in your own little world of self-assuredness.

 

[watsup]

You just keep living in your own little world of self-assuredness.

Psychological projection BIGTIME!

 

[grip]

Then what is this doing in this particular forum? Go find the science forum.

You don't get to tell me what to do, so there's that.

Yet more nonsense blather. Does Hawking agree with this, or were you using his name in vain?

The fact that you don't know says volumes about the veracity of your retorts.

 

[grip]

Psychological projection BIGTIME!

How would you know since you admit a lack of knowledge about physics yourself? I can't help it if she's reticent to ever learn anything new or out of her depth.

 

[watsup]

You don't get to tell me what to do, so there's that.

The fact that you don't know says volumes about the veracity of your retorts.

I DO know what Hawking says about the potential existence of a “god” of any sort. Apparently you don’t. And why won’t you say why science material is in this particular forum?

 

[watsup]

How would you know since you admit a lack of knowledge about physics yourself? I can't help it if she's reticent to ever learn anything new or out of her depth.

“Knowing about physics” really doesn’t mean much when you try to extend it into your nonsensical claims.

 

[grip]

I DO know what Hawking says about the potential existence of a “god” of any sort. Apparently you don’t. And why won’t you say why science material is in this particular forum?

Who said anything about God? It's a forum about beliefs that I use science to partially explain. Show me where there's an exclusion to this.

 

[Napoleon]

Yet more nonsense blather. Does Hawking agree with this, or were you using his name in vain?

Hawking is a decomposing corpse. He’s not agreeing or disagreeing with anything these days.