- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Sedition is alive and well in the USA.
This kind of repulsive anti-Obama manure would have been prosecuted a decade ago with the Patriot Act.
This decade, forget about that Patriot thingy.
Sedition is alive and well in the USA.
This kind of repulsive anti-Obama manure would have been prosecuted a decade ago with the Patriot Act.
This decade, forget about that Patriot thingy.
Got anything to say since he is Lambasting Johnny Quest McCain too? I notice those Obama slurping comments don't have anything to say about that. Wonder why that is? Got any valid reason why for some reason you could not fathom that part out?
Did you notice how Buchanan pointed out who is behind the Rebels and what they have done.
He is absolutely correct.....there is no Reason to save Obama Face.
Did you forget when Churchill wanted to Drop Anthrax on Germany for 2 days? But opted for Firebombing the Defenseless City of Dresden?
Sycophancy is also alive and well apparently.
Was that you with plastic gloves dipped in red paint waving behind Kerry?
After Hitler bombed my Mother in London for two years with Repubs having tied FDRs' hands, I'll treat your Dresden question as should we have lost a half million more men attacking Japan?
Call Your Congressman or woman and pick up the New Mantra.....No going to War to Save Obama's Face. No going to War to take the Egg Off Obama Face.
Johnny Quest McCain if flying a False Flag. Was it Catastrophic for the Brits to be told by their people......NO!
We need to have Good Ole Johnny checked out for senility and to see if he is losing his faculties. His state of mind should be questioned by the press and all others. Anytime he opens that Reptillian looking mouth of his. What a Putz and wannabe Hawk.
No Syrian War to Save Obama's Face!
Pat Buchanan – 14 hrs ago
"Catastrophic!" said Sen. John McCain.
If Congress votes no on a resolution calling for U.S. intervention in Syria's civil war, says McCain, it would be "catastrophic" for U.S. credibility in the world.
Consider what the senator is saying here.
Because Barack Obama, two years ago, said "Assad must go," and, one year ago, said any use of chemical weapons crosses his "red line," Congress has no choice but to plunge America into yet another Mideast war.
Can this be? Are we really, as a nation, required to go to war to make good the simple-minded statements of an untutored president who had no constitutional authority to issue his impulsive ultimata?
Are we really required to go to war to get the egg off Obama's face?
The House, Senate or both can vote no on the war resolution and Obama can then say, as did David Cameron, that, while he disagrees, he respects the decision of a Congress in which the Constitution placed sole authority to authorize America's going to war.
Are Brits now crying "catastrophe!"? Do the Spanish no longer think the Brits will defend Gibraltar? Is Britain now wholly non-credible to the world?
Even if Congress approves a war resolution, the president should think long and hard about diving into a war he sought to avoid and stayed out of for over two years. Make no mistake; if Obama attacks Syria, be it for hours or days, we are in that blood-soaked abattoir for the duration.
In his dramatic statement Saturday, as politically astute as it was constitutionally correct, Obama called Syria "someone else's war."
Whose war? It is Shia Alawite vs. Sunni, Muslim vs. Christian, Kurd vs. Arab, Islamist vs. secularist. Backing Bashar Assad are Iran, Hezbollah and Russia. Backing the rebels are Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states, al-Qaida, foreign jihadists and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Assad is accused of killing 100,00 people. But that is the total of the dead in a civil war Assad has as much right to fight as the rebels. While his army is accused of using gas on civilians, the Islamist rebels have murdered Christians, massacred captives and engaged in public acts of cannibalism on dead Syrian soldiers.....snip~
No Syrian War to Save Obama's Face!
I thought it was the liberals and libertarians who are voting no. Which are you? And as I've been saying since Snowden, this is the Amash coalition. You do know Amash lashed out at Cons today.
Right so you would avoid the facts. Thats nothing new coming from the left.
Already done...Told my Senator and congressman that Even if Hitler and Mussolini are going to ran against them I will not vote for them if they say yes on going to war.
Helping people...Congress won't give a shait, helping Americans...Congress won't give a shait. Helping Children...Congress won't give shait.... Blowing up Brown Women and Children all of sudden congress is fully behind it.
Now having said that....Look at you guys!!!.... all Conservativie and Republicanny AND being anti-war and sound of reason...I guess being Anti Obama has the strange side effects of being anti-war....Hope it will contagious!
Diving Mullah
You would do a nice job selling a war against Syria. We'll continue this discussion up to the point when these Russian puppets can launch bio/chem weapons at the USA.No I was the one behind Kerry with the Boot off into his ass[/COLORWe are told that if we do not strike Syria — making good on Obama's threats — Israel, Turkey and even Japan and South Korea will not be able to trust us ever again.
As for Turkey and Israel, if what is happening in Syria is outrageous and dangerous, why do they not act?
The Israeli Air force is five minutes from Damascus, its army a two-day march. The Turks have three times Syria's population and a 400,000-man army equipped with NATO weapons. Together, they could invade and turn the tide in a week. Why do they not man up?
McCain and Sen. Lindsey Graham came out of the Oval Office saying Obama was open to wider strikes on Syria and more lethal support for the rebels.
So you are actually saying that it is okay for us to go to War......
I thought it was the liberals and libertarians who are voting no. Which are you? And as I've been saying since Snowden, this is the Amash coalition. You do know Amash lashed out at Cons today.
You would do a nice job selling a war against Syria. We'll continue this discussion up to the point when these Russian puppets can launch bio/chem weapons at the USA.
Sedition is alive and well in the USA.
This kind of repulsive anti-Obama manure would have been prosecuted a decade ago with the Patriot Act.
This decade, forget about that Patriot thingy.
Ah yes, people don't agree with Obama and it's sedition. When people didn't agree with Bush and wanted him prosecuted for war crimes, what was that? When Americans want Canada and other countries to arrest Bush and send him to the Hague, what was that?
Some in this world have very selective memories.
Heya CJ .....Buchanan nails it here.Notice the Obama slurpers have ran away. As usual. :lamo
McCain and Sen. Lindsey Graham came out of the Oval Office saying Obama was open to wider strikes on Syria and more lethal support for the rebels.
But what it will likely end with, after America is dragooned in, is a U.S. war with Iran; our allies, sitting in their box seats, cheering us on.
And that is the dog you will not hear bark in the war-on-Syria debate......snip~
No Syrian War to Save Obama's Face!
Kerry did testify yesterday that there is a possibility that this would lead to boots on the ground in the future but that the authorization they are looking for now doesn't include it or anticipate it. That should tell Americans all they need to know.
If it's just a front for the US and/or Israel to attack Iran's nuclear program - if that's the hidden agenda - then this might actually be a worthwhile endeavor. If it's just to shoot at a few Syrian installations so Obama and his fans can claim he keeps his word, that's just nonsense.
The whole forum here, the whole media, the whole world is against attack in Syria.The funny thing is, if Obama were against a strike on Syria, MMC would be whining that he's weak and that the US must act militarily.
Conservatism is totally and completely intellectually bankrupt. If MMC only knew how transparently dishonest he looked on this thread.
The funny thing is, if Obama were against a strike on Syria, MMC would be whining that he's weak and that the US must act militarily.
Conservatism is totally and completely intellectually bankrupt. If MMC only knew how transparently dishonest he looked on this thread.
The funny thing is, if Obama were against a strike on Syria, MMC would be whining that he's weak and that the US must act militarily.
Conservatism is totally and completely intellectually bankrupt. If MMC only knew how transparently dishonest he looked on this thread.
Oh did you now.....you must not have been paying attention to those Democrats that were just saying......NO! Here I will let Chrissy Matthews spell it out for you.
Chris Matthews: Democrats Will Have To Vote For Syria Intervention 'To Save The President's Hide'
Chris Matthews lamented Wednesday that President Obama is putting Congressional Democrats who don't support U.S. military action against Syria "in a bad position."
The MSNBC host appeared on "Morning Joe" to discuss the president's call for intervention. "I think the Democrats are going to be forced to sacrifice men and women who really, really don’t want to vote for this," Matthews said. "They’re going to have to vote for it to save the president’s hide. That's a bad position to put your party in."
Matthews then agreed with his assessment, saying, "When you hear Barbara Boxer yesterday, when you hear Jim Moran yesterday, you have to wonder what they would have said had it been a Republican president.” ......snip~
Chris Matthews: Democrats Will Have To Vote For Syria Intervention 'To Save The President's Hide' (VIDEO)
I don't know if I can find you some of my comments referring to C. Matthews as a "chameleon"...
I was going with a story on Politico, where libs and libertarians were combining against Obama, in what I like to call the Amash coalition...
Then it gets put up on threads on DP where we can go at it as we used to on Politico, anonymously.
Ah yes, people don't agree with Obama and it's sedition. When people didn't agree with Bush and wanted him prosecuted for war crimes, what was that? When Americans want Canada and other countries to arrest Bush and send him to the Hague, what was that?
Some in this world have very selective memories.
Yeah well I expect the Right to go after him. That's a given. What makes it all the more interesting. Is when all those Democrats jump out into the media and make the Big Shoe.....then turn around and will vote just to save Obama's face.
All of them should be listening to their constituients.....first and formost. That's what puts them there.
Plus you have already seen me say. McCain needs to be checked for senility. Which they should be on him about his mental health. In essence driving him out to pasture!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?