• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

No Adam, no Eve: the foundation and structure of Christianity collapse

The fertile crescent enjoyed more easily domesticable plants and animals.than any other area on earth. Hands down. In the entire new world the largest "domesticable" animal was the llama and corn started as a tiny seed pod. That was about it.
 
I read somewhere once that some think all of the legends of the fall, the eating from the tree of knowledge were all stories told.by peoples that hadn't adopted agriculture as early.

The difference you mention between man and the animals. The earlier peoples were."part" of the world they lived in. Those doing the farming were no.longer. they decided what lived and what died. What could be eaten and what could not. What posed a.threat to crops or livestock. Weeds.were eliminated. Predators were.eliminated.

See how that kind of fits your model?
 
For may are called but few are chosen. God didn’t give everyone faith. It’s a gift to his elect.

Yet another example of a racist god. He has an "elect" - he has a "chosen people". And he apparently has a favorite gender, too! We're expected to believe that the creator of the entire cosmos chooses favorite races of people to survive and thrive, while the rest of his sons and daughters suffer eternal damnation. That horseshit actually makes sense to some people! Personally, I would never worship such a petty, capricious deity, and it surprises me that so many thinking adult people would. It sounds like a "god" you would try to sell to naive little children, just to keep them in line.

Worshiping such a deity - this flighty, racist, misogynist, jealous, vengeful, sociopathic god - says a lot about his followers, and none of it good. I'm happy to not be among his elect.

Many are cold, but few are frozen.
 
It's kind of strange to so many are so committed to disproving that which they don't believe. Why does it take so much effort to disprove nothing?
What a ridiculous notion you have. Who do you think is "so committed to disproving" anything? The earth and planetary sciences don't progress and advance with the intention of disproving anyone's religious beliefs. That whole idea is beyond laughable. The tens-of-thousands of earth and planetary scientists around the world work in their very diverse fields to better understand the truths of our world and our universe. The last thing on their minds in their study and exploration of that world, is disproving anyone's belief in ancient mythologies.

Where on earth did you get such a silly idea?
 
Where did they come from? You have to go back to a male and female at some point...a whole group of people didn't just poof into existence...

Nope, you could just start with the tiny group of survivors of Noah’s (global?) flood.
 
Humans didn't 'start'. They evolved from other primates. Homo Sapiens became a distinct species when it stopped being able to inter breed with other species.
 
Is this thread not all about disproving the basis for Christianity? It isn't the only thread here with that purpose either. Heck, denying, disparaging and disproving the Truth has been a hobby of man for a very, very long time yet, for some strange reason, the Truth remains. Some might find it rather remarkable that 3000 or 4000 years of kicking against the goads hasn't diminished the plow rows one bit. Others might look at that circumstance and and think, "Well, such is the nature of man."
 
They would be just a few.generations from a perfect genome though. Not made of DNA subjected to millions of years.of cosmic radiation.

Not that I think it is more than parable. Just from a feasibility standpoint.
I too believe it is a nice story for children. It borrows from many earlier creation stories.

The Old Testament shies away from declaring itself the true word of God (perhaps due to being the history of a people and it's established religion.)

The New Testament on the other hand declares itself the true word of God (perhaps due to the need to convince followers to join a new religion and not question it)

When I was young my Minister told me many stories we read were parables to explain complex ideas. Not literal truth but a guide to a good life...
 
I understand why believers believe. All I am saying is that it is based in myth.


I understand that you think you understand. You clearly don't, for which I am sorry. I will pray that you do come to understand.
 
So...was murder also moral before god made a rule for it? Just curious.
 

And yet not a single person has offered a solid rebuttal to my OP that the MYTH of Adam and Eve undermines the foundation of Christianity and thus the entire basic doctrine of the need for a “Redeemer” comes crashing down. And “truth” is the result of objective analysis of alternatives, it is not just “given”.
 
It is all the true word of God. God IS the Word and the Word is spread in many ways.

We might well doubt that a tortoise ever raced a hare and won but that wasn't really the point of the story, was it?
 
Biologically? Past the point of caring for offspring, mating, protection from predators, surviving natural elements…mammals don’t tend to care about one another.
Well...the problem is that isn't really true. Elephants will have "funerals" for each other. There is the rather bizarre story of the dolphin that commit suicide after being separated from their trainer.
Peter and Margaret were separated. He was shlepped to a dolphin tank in Florida, where within weeks, he “committed suicide by refusing to breathe, and sinking to the bottom of his tank.”

Animals almost certainly love. As certain as we can be about the mind of another outside of our own.
 
So...was murder also moral before god made a rule for it? Just curious.
Jehovah God warned Cain, yes...Cain ignored the warning...

" Cain grew hot with anger and was dejected. Then Jehovah said to Cain: “Why are you so angry and dejected? If you turn to doing good, will you not be restored to favor? But if you do not turn to doing good, sin is crouching at the door, and its craving is to dominate you; but will you get the mastery over it?” Genesis 4:5-7
 
Ok, but what about before that happened? Like, you said incest was fine before god made a rule against it. Was murder, homosexuality, theft, other sins etc also moral before god made rules against them?
 
Ok, but what about before that happened? Like, you said incest was fine before god made a rule against it. Was murder, homosexuality, theft, other sins etc also moral before god made rules against them?
Swwwoooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...
 
Regarding the whole Genesis vs evolution thing, and its impact on Christianity, and what I think about all that...

I don't worry about it.

Was creation literally six days, or was it six periods of time that, had any human been there to see it, would have seemed like millions of years?
I don't know. I wasn't there. Neither were you, nor any other human. At best we look back "through a glass, darkly".

Einstein proved time was relative to the observer. The Bible says "a day with the Lord is as a thousand years, and a thousand years is as a day." Perhaps when God puts his hand on something, time flows as He wills it, in a way beyond our understanding.

Should Genesis be taken literally, or as allegorical/metaphorical "the best understanding people of the time could grasp"?
Again, I don't know. I don't worry about it.

I don't worry about it because I know God. I know He is real, and whatever the details of how life came to be He was in charge from beginning to end.

The seeming disconnect between Genesis and science doesn't worry me... one day God will explain it to me in person.

A lot of you won't understand this. Some will.
 
Swwwoooosssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...
I'm not sure what this response means. I'm genuinely trying to understand what your beliefs are.
 
It is all the true word of God. God IS the Word and the Word is spread in many ways.

We might well doubt that a tortoise ever raced a hare and won but that wasn't really the point of the story, was it?
So, the Bible isn't infallible as the parables may well be doubted. The stories told are simple tales to give one side of history. It's one thing to believe God created the heavens and the earth, another to believe Humans existed for only 6,000 years.
 
I'm not sure what this response means. I'm genuinely trying to understand what your beliefs are.
Well, think about it...were so many laws necessary when there were only 4 people on the earth? No...as the human race grew, more laws were needed to direct/teach/instruct them...
 
I'm not here to "rebut" anything.

The creation of Adam separated man from divinity. No man is, was or ever will be a god. We are caretakers, servants and subjects of the mortal realm. The original sin was our dissatisfaction with that role and our pursuit of more than the abundance that was freely given us. Christ, the Word made flesh, is the path to reconciliation with original sin. The Holy Spirit is the legacy of the Word among men. The Word is eternal and faith in the Word is the relentless pursuit of peace through selfless love which, of course, is the state in which man was created. There is no "myth" in the creation or anything that came after creation. There is only the Message.
 
You seem to be focused on the trees while there is an entire forest before you.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…