He violated his contract with the NFL. Courts don't matter.
So what?
So long as he's guilty and that can be demonstrated, I suppose so. In this case there was likely ample evidence, but so long as we are reasonable and wait for evidence.
So what? You're calling everyone an "emotional dimwit". Has it ever occurred to you that maybe everyone else is not the problem you're having?
His contract specifically states that criminal conviction is not required for action by the NFL.
You know, if it was true that no one agrees with me that fact alone wouldn't mean everyone agrees with you.
Which is fine, I said so long as we remain reasonable and evidence is presented. We can't just go off of hearsay.
It's a yes or no question. You're totally alone and claiming everyone is an "emotional dimwit". That's like a child throwing a fit. I don't know what causes this behavior and this is not the place to figure that out. So, I bid thee a good day.
Even if you were "qualified" to figure it out I wouldn't care what your diagnose was.
Anyway, your assumption continues to be that everyone disagrees with me and that everyone agrees with you.
I presume you know why you hold a delusional position. So I really don't think a diagnosis would be news.
It's not an assumption. It's an observation. Evidence is found in this and every other thread about Peterson.
So why is his actions in his private life reflective of the NFL?
No, his behavior has nothing to do with the NFL.
Why is it ****ing stupid? If a man built houses for a living and spent most of his time driving nails does it matter at all that he is an abusive asshole to his children? It would make sense to fire someone that works with children if they are found to be abusive to their own children, but otherwise, it makes no sense.
So why is his actions in his private life reflective of the NFL?
The company that hires him can suspend him for what ever reason they want. It's a private industry. All the sudden you are against private industry doing what is in its best interest?What does beating your kid have to do with running a football? Sorry, but I still don't get what his job has to do with how he treats kids.
The company that hires him can suspend him for what ever reason they want. It's a private industry. All the sudden you are against private industry doing what is in its best interest?
So You ate only a libertarian when it doesn't conflict with your television?
So what are you on about? They know their business better than you.I never said they couldn't suspend him for whatever reason they wanted.
No, for some reason my spell check confuses the word "are" with the word "ate."What? Are you saying you don't eat libertarians? :lol:
The company that hires him can suspend him for what ever reason they want. It's a private industry. All the sudden you are against private industry doing what is in its best interest?
So You ate only a libertarian when it doesn't conflict with your television?
Libertarians can be delicious, or so I'm told by some of my cannibal friends.
Child-like logic and ideologies, sadly, do not translate to child-like taste!
Why is it ****ing stupid? If a man built houses for a living and spent most of his time driving nails does it matter at all that he is an abusive asshole to his children? It would make sense to fire someone that works with children if they are found to be abusive to their own children, but otherwise, it makes no sense.
Because if the carpenter did something that would make people not want to buy his company's houses, he'd be kicking stones down the road soon enough. The NFL produces fans. This a**hole is bad for business.
So what are you on about? They know their business better than you.
No, for some reason my spell check confuses the word "are" with the word "ate."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?