New video shows poll workers violating Georgia election law

[pamak]

Well, this one will most certainly make it to the courts. The eye witnesses will testify then. You are correct in that there might be a logical reason, but I don't see it.

There have been so many people who have testified of election irregularities and illegal actions. Did you see the video regarding Detroit? Very compelling evidence.

I have shifted my mind from believing that Biden did squeek in an unexpected win, to now believing there was a mass conspiracy. And I am no conspiracy theorist.

In order to make it to the courts, you need to show the law that was violated.

As it was explained, there WAS an indepedent monitor as it was required by Georgia's law.

You are graudally losing (not shifting) your mind as the inaguration date approaches.

I think we need to find now some "safe spaces" for conservatives who cannot accept reality.

 

[Acadia]

In order to make it to the courts, you need to show the law that was violated.

As it was explained, there WAS an indepedent monitor as it was required by Georgia's law.

You are graudally losing (not shifting) your mind as the inagurration date approaches. I think we need to find now some "safe spaces" for conservatives who cannot accept reality.

Which one was the independent monitor?

 

[pamak]

Which one was the independent monitor?

Read the numerous links that have been posted.

 

[Acadia]

Read the numerous links that have been posted.

There's only 4 people in the room and you can't tell me which one it is??

 

[Acadia]

Anyone see the huge spike in Biden ballots which coincides with tossing out the poll watchers? Nearly 100% of the ballots went to Biden just at that exact moment in time.
Funny that.

 

[vegas giants]

Anyone see the huge spike in Biden ballots which coincides with tossing out the poll watchers? Nearly 100% of the ballots went to Biden just at that exact moment in time.
Funny that.

I think it is hilarious

 

[pamak]

There's only 4 people in the room and you can't tell me which one it is??

I posted one link and others posted rhe same thing from different sources

New video shows poll workers violating Georgia election law

What's being requested is an investigation into the origin and authenticity of the ballots that were pulled out and counted without any oversight. Depending on the outcome of that investigation there may be cause to call for overturning the election results. The ballots were opened with...

debatepolitics.com

READ IT!

 

[LouC]

Put everyone under oath and embarrass all those backwood retarded trumpers. Seems like an easy enough solution.

To what point would you call or convene some costly, real bipartisan hearing, before what pertinent body, to have folks testify about what they might have or not have heard and might have or might have not misunderstood, all to satisfy some curious notions of disinterested parties in regards something that is totally irrelevant in the first place? Why they left is irrelevant because what took place in that room after they had gone was in no way nefarious, corrupt, illegal, sneaky, fraudulent or untoward but was legal and above board SOP.

Were they to go to those lengths what might might be the outcome if discovered an Election Unit Manager had directly told them to leave, perhaps only mistakenly, or with some overt intent? That Elections Unit Manager might be fired? Might be reprimanded? Might simply be told "don't do that again"? It certainly would not in any way shape or form be evidence of any voting fraud or corruption. It certainly would not result in any vote tally changes.

Why should the good people of Georgia foot the bill for such a needless hunt for some guilty party, that if found, would not change a thing regarding the fact Joe Biden won the right to the Georgia Electoral College votes?

 

[Acadia]

I posted one link and others posted rhe same thing from different sources

New video shows poll workers violating Georgia election law

What's being requested is an investigation into the origin and authenticity of the ballots that were pulled out and counted without any oversight. Depending on the outcome of that investigation there may be cause to call for overturning the election results. The ballots were opened with...

debatepolitics.com

READ IT!

So who was it?

 

[pamak]

So who was it?

I do not care about this answer because it adds nothing relevant to the points of this conversation!

All we need to know is that we have an OFFICIAL statement that he was there.

No, Atlanta Didn’t Count Illegal Ballots In Secret (Or In Suitcases)

President Trump’s attorneys claim they finally have proof of voter fraud in Atlanta, but the evidence they’ve presented shows election workers behaving normally, state officials say.

www.forbes.com

An independent state-appointed monitor was also present during vote-counting in Atlanta, and did not find any indications of illegal counting, a spokesperson for the Secretary of State’s office told Forbes.

“Nothing we have learned from the independent monitor or our investigation have suggested any improper ballots were scanned,” the Georgia Secretary of State’s office said in a statement to Forbes.

 

[LouC]

The unbiased observer would say our system is most certainly corruptible.

In your opinion, they might.

Being a part of the system as an active member I know for certain these, our election systems, are, absolutely corruptible.

Also having nearly two decades of experience in two different states and having the whole election thingie as a well researched, across all states, private subject of interest I can say with more than enough authority, for myself, and perhaps others that the claims of fraud and corruption being presented in these "not a real hearing" hotel meetings and in these crazy Rudy and company press briefings and even into some of these real hearings are not at all credible and are lacking in total substance what they overweight in ludicrousness.

 

[Lord of Planar]

In order to make it to the courts, you need to show the law that was violated.

As it was explained, there WAS an indepedent monitor as it was required by Georgia's law.

You are graudally losing (not shifting) your mind as the inaguration date approaches.

I think we need to find now some "safe spaces" for conservatives who cannot accept reality.

Wrong.

You need evidence that it needs to be looked at by the courts, then the courts decide.

I see you list yourself as a socialist. Well, this isn't a socislist state where only the decided guilty go to court.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Anyone see the huge spike in Biden ballots which coincides with tossing out the poll watchers? Nearly 100% of the ballots went to Biden just at that exact moment in time.
Funny that.

Yes, sort of. In the thread that was closed, I mentioned that, when I was watching the data come in. There was a sharp change in momentum. I wouldn't say 100% went to Biden, since other precincts were reporting too.

 

[pamak]

Wrong.

You need evidence that it needs to be looked at by the courts, then the courts decide.

I see you list yourself as a socialist. Well, this isn't a socislist state where only the decided guilty go to court.

Evidence of an illegal activity.

Just because you claim you have such evidence, it does not mean that you have it.

 

[iguanaman]

The unbiased observer would say our system is most certainly corruptible.

Yet this election was called the most secure in our history by the experts that should know. . I'm sure the 2016 election was far less secure. It is curious that Mr. One and done said that if he lost that would mean the election was fraudulent and you agree. Does that really sound like proof to you?

 

[iguanaman]

Yes, sort of. In the thread that was closed, I mentioned that, when I was watching the data come in. There was a sharp change in momentum. I wouldn't say 100% went to Biden, since other precincts were reporting too.

LOL You are surprised that most one term loser voters voted in person and most Biden voters used the mail which were counted last?

 

[Lord of Planar]

Yet this election was called the most secure in our history by the experts that should know. . I'm sure the 2016 election was far less secure. It is curious that Mr. One and done said that if he lost that would mean the election was fraudulent and you agree. Does that really sound like proof to you?

Other experts say otherwise.

Still the professional cherry picker, huh?

 

[pamak]

The unbiased observer would say our system is most certainly corruptible.

Did you say this when the mostly GOP controlled states were engaged in partisan gerrymandering with the blessings of the conservative Supreme Court?

 

[Hamish Howl]

And here we have a demonstration of sheer hypocrisy. Nothing was said about 'national debt' when Trump was running up the national debt with tax-breaks for the rich, and feeding the military complex gobs of money . That was even before covid 19.

I do not care about this answer because it adds nothing relevant to the points of this conversation!

All we need to know is that we have an OFFICIAL statement that he was there.

No, Atlanta Didn’t Count Illegal Ballots In Secret (Or In Suitcases)

President Trump’s attorneys claim they finally have proof of voter fraud in Atlanta, but the evidence they’ve presented shows election workers behaving normally, state officials say.

www.forbes.com

An independent state-appointed monitor was also present during vote-counting in Atlanta, and did not find any indications of illegal counting, a spokesperson for the Secretary of State’s office told Forbes.

“Nothing we have learned from the independent monitor or our investigation have suggested any improper ballots were scanned,” the Georgia Secretary of State’s office said in a statement to Forbes.

Well, you know Forbes, that bastion of liberalism.

 

[Lord of Planar]

LOL You are surprised that most one term loser voters voted in person and most Biden voters used the mail which were counted last?

Not at all. That's a different topic, and has nothing to do with people, at best, improperly handling ballots in a system that we want no question of integrity over.

You are rationalizing things that are clearly suspicious. Nothing suspicious should happen in the first place.

 

[iguanaman]

Other experts say otherwise.

Still the professional cherry picker, huh?

Which experts agree with the one term mistakes belief that if he lost the election was rigged? All elections have losers and that does not indicate fraud.

 

[Hamish Howl]

Other experts say otherwise.

Still the professional cherry picker, huh?

No experts say otherwise. You have Sydney Powell's acid trip, the drunk lady, and Guliani leaking hair dye all over the place.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Did you say this when the mostly GOP controlled states were engaged in partisan gerrymandering with the blessings of the conservative Supreme Court?

Please stay focused on the topic, and stop trying to derail it.

 

[LouC]

So in 8, 10, 12 years when folks are still arguing that Trump won reelection what are we to call them, besides "idiots", you know like Truther's and Birther's?

How about Duncer's?

 

[iguanaman]

Not at all. That's a different topic, and has nothing to do with people, at best, improperly handling ballots in a system that we want no question of integrity over.

You are rationalizing things that are clearly suspicious. Nothing suspicious should happen in the first place.

It is not suspicious that Trump got crushed by Biden. He was the least popular President in history. What is strange is that you think that means he was cheated. That is not very American of you is it?