Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
What is a true conservative? Please define without using Wikipedia.
I don't care but that does not mean I don't know the primary mission of the anus as you seem to not know..............
Actually, you are wrong. Same sex marriage can be approved under the grounds that a strong evidence base shows that it is beneficial to both partcipants and that same sex couples can raise children just as well as different sex couples. Can you provide such an evidence base for polygamous families? Incestuous couples? People who want to have sex with animals or children? I don't think so.
In addition to that, up to 8 to 10 million children of gay parents and same sex couples would benefit from same sex marriage. Can you argue anywhere near that number of children would benefit from incestuous marriage? Polygamous marriage?
Trying to oversimply this argument isn't going to work. The parental evidence and number of children who would benefit are factors supporting same sex marriage, and there is no such parental evidence or number of children who would benefit from recognizing other forms of marriage like polygamy or incestuous.
You said that, not me..............
How did you go about determining this "primary mission"?
Yes my left wing friend its called the 14th amendment, the equal protecttion clause..........
Oh Please...that is just plain silly. The school would already be aware when the child registered...and let me also give you a clue....non-"traditional" families are quite common and the vast majority of people in this country are accepting even if not necessarily supportive of the concept. The only people who would make an issue of this in today's world arethe old fuddy-duddies and the evangelicals that want to spin it into an issue to promote their radical agenda.
Maybe you can help me my left wing friend.......Where has same sex marriage been approved when a vote by the people took place?
You just did it again.
I am not "left wing" it is not my name, and not my ideology. I am a Jeffersonian Constitutionalist for lack of a better term.
I am not even getting into the bigotry you preach against Arabs as that is a thread all by itself.
Your arguments and attitude exemplify the worst America has to offer. You would sacrifice freedom for security. You would sacrifice freedom for one group of people based on little more then ethnicity. You would sacrifice freedom in the name of God, who said to OBEY the laws of your government because HE is the one that put them in place.
In the end you seem to feel anyone who disagrees with you is "left wing" whether they are or not. :roll:
You mean legislatively? Maine, Vermont. and New Hampshire.
You mean by people referendum? Nowhere.
Of course I don't why that is an argument since interracial marriage was never approved by people referendum. To my knowledge, neither was women's suffrage or the freedom of slaves. Are you arguing we should undo all those things because the people didn't vote for it, they were carried out by the Supreme Court and Legislature?
Nothing radical about referring to "parents" rather than "mother and father", that was silly nonsense creating an issue where there is none - except for bigoted fundamentalists.Actually, no. It is the leftist movement who has spun it into their radical agenda and branded anyone espousing morals and decency to be bigots.
Maybe you can help me my left wing friend.......Where has same sex marriage been approved when a vote by the people took place?
No No No...I mean by a vote of the people....
Like I told you when all your political beliefs are far left, I don't care what you call yourself you are a left winger. You may not know it but you are........Now this thread is not about me so please try and stay on the primary topic.......thanks.........
As I said, nowhere, but neither was interracial marriage. The Supreme Court had to decide people of different races could marry because 19 states had made it illegal.
I always do.you to....:2wave:Yea, you got nothing, typical. :roll:
Have a nice day.
I wonder how "the people" would vote in MA these days. Would care to check the polls?
As I said, nowhere, but neither was interracial marriage. The Supreme Court had to decide people of different races could marry because 19 states had made it illegal.
Sorry interracial marriage was about a man and a woman.gay marriage is not..........
Nothing radical about referring to "parents" rather than "mother and father", that was silly nonsense creating an issue where there is none - except for bigoted fundamentalists.
Don't fall into their trap my friend, hey are losing the debate and grasping for straws by chnanging the subject of the thread..they have a habit of doing that when they get creamed............
How did you go about determining this "primary mission"?
Sorry interracial marriage was about a man and a woman.gay marriage is not..........
God determined its function when he created man and woman. Ask any doctor its function, and he will also tell you. Now you can plug it up if you so desire, but eventually you're not going to be very happy at the outcome. :lol:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?