Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
This should knockdown future gay marriages in this state and when the SCOTUS voids gay marriage then all those other marriages will be voided. Lets see how one of the most liberal states votes.
DARIUS DIXON | 3/21/12 7:11 AM EDT
The New Hampshire House is expected to vote Wednesday on whether to repeal the state’s two-year-old law that legalized gay marriage.
Republicans backing the rollback bill say it would define marriage as between a man and woman, while allowing the state’s nearly 2,000 existing same-sex marriages to remain valid, The Associated Press reports. If approved, the measure would take affect in March 2013 and re-establish civil unions for same-sex couples
Read more: New Hampshire to vote on gay marriage repeal - POLITICO.com
So glad we have nothing better to be doing. Go government!
Yeah but when activists approved gay marriages 2 years ago you had no problem with them then...........:lamo
I generally am in favor of reducing government, yes.
Anyone have any idea the amount of money our government has wasted trying to tell people who they can and can't marry?
Unless they go over the will of the people and then they can be as big they want.
This should knockdown future gay marriages in this state and when the SCOTUS voids gay marriage then all those other marriages will be voided. Lets see how one of the most liberal states votes.
DARIUS DIXON | 3/21/12 7:11 AM EDT
The New Hampshire House is expected to vote Wednesday on whether to repeal the state’s two-year-old law that legalized gay marriage.
Republicans backing the rollback bill say it would define marriage as between a man and woman, while allowing the state’s nearly 2,000 existing same-sex marriages to remain valid, The Associated Press reports. If approved, the measure would take affect in March 2013 and re-establish civil unions for same-sex couples
Read more: New Hampshire to vote on gay marriage repeal - POLITICO.com
the measure would take affect in March 2013 and re-establish civil unions for same-sex couples.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74293.html#ixzz1pnh0GTjh
If this bill gets passed, I'm gonna lose a lot of faith in NH.
Wait, New Hampshire is liberal? New Hampshire, where we would buy things because of the lack of taxes is liberal? New Hampshire where their motto is Live Free or Die? The most liberal state that has voted for the Republican candidate 6 of the last 10 elections? Besides, I am not so sure they will vote for this bill, or that the Supreme Court will rule against gay marriage.
Unless they go over the will of the people and then they can be as big they want.
This should knockdown future gay marriages in this state and when the SCOTUS voids gay marriage then all those other marriages will be voided. Lets see how one of the most liberal states votes.....
Well **** if the people of NH know that it will never pass.
If approved, the measure would...re-establish civil unions for same-sex couples
I guess everybody was so busy looking for the QuickRantReply button that they missed this little detail.
So SS couples get the same legal framework and protections that OS couples get. So what's the problem? Unless it's not really legal protections proponents of SSM were after in the first place...
I guess everybody was so busy looking for the QuickRantReply button that they missed this little detail.
So SS couples get the same legal framework and protections that OS couples get. So what's the problem? Unless it's not really legal protections proponents of SSM were after in the first place...
Separate but equal is unconstitutional.
So then why try and change it?
Segregation is not at issue here. Will homosexuals have civil unions in separate homosexual only courthouses? Hell, they can even use the same form from NH, just check off one box for civil union and one for marriage. Any church that wishes to marry them can marry both SS couples and opposite sex couples, they would not be required by government to have two separate places for marriage.
Go fish.
...and if they can exercise that right anywhere anyplace anytime they want to...then what, exactly is the issue?Segregation isn't limited to objects and buildings. You're segregating a right.
And what the hell is so important about not calling it marriage.
And if were gonna play a card game, it's gonna be Texas Hold 'Em.
Enough with the appeal to tradition. It's getting old.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?