• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Netflix' Tone deaf Paen to Sexualizing Underage Girls Will be Rigorously Defended by Liberals

Advocates for legalizing pedophilia always align with the left. Do you wish to debate that?

Try your comment again, without the phony indignation and distortion of my statement this time.

To accuse the left of wanting to legalize pedophilia is as stupid as it is ugly. Words like "absurdly" and "predictable" come to mind.

Do you wish to debate that?




To start with a Netflix production to do that is probably stupider it than it is ugly.

Do you wish to debate that?




This is just another TAAC thread. Why the wink wink nudge nudge know what I mean? routine. We all know what you are saying and why. Just say it. Stop pretending to hide it.
 
My statement, which is true btw, was that advocates for legalizing pedophilia 'align with the left'. The very idea that adults should be legally allowed to have sex with children originated from left wing circles, such as psychology & psychiatry (Wilhelm Reich), postmodern philosophy (Michel Foucault), the civil rights movement (Harriet Harman, now a British MP), as well as the gay rights movement (Ian Dunn, Foucault, too many to list).

Wilhelm Reich actually gained acclaim for his work against fascism in the 1930s, when he wrote a book that said fascists suffered from sexual frustration. He was lauded and applauded by academia. Fast forward a bit- Reich ended up fleeing to America when the Nazis took power. In America he set up an institution where he sexually massaged children, in order to prevent them from 'becoming fascists', lmao. It's funny and terrifying at the same time. Reich was Jewish of course. He managed to prove the fascists right, don't you think? It would have been better if he'd been imprisoned or worse by the Nazis. But of course if that had happened, he'd be considered a martyr today, instead of a creep pedophilia who exploited fears of fascism to molest kids.

Actually im going to require evidence for this. Postmodernism has nothing to say about pedophilia as it is a rejection of grand narratives of history and the inevitable path of history.
 
Last edited:
Moral standards do seem hilarious to people who have none. :shrug:

Said the man whose avatar is historically known as an anti-Semite and terrorist.

"The Jews are our enemies and as such they hate, poison, and exterminate us. Romanians who cross into their camp are worse than enemies: they are traitors. If I had but one bullet and were faced by both an enemy and a traitor, I would let the traitor have it."
 
To accuse the left of wanting to legalize pedophilia is as stupid as it is ugly. Words like "absurdly" and "predictable" come to mind.

Do you wish to debate that?




To start with a Netflix production to do that is probably stupider it than it is ugly.

Do you wish to debate that?




This is just another TAAC thread. Why the wink wink nudge nudge know what I mean? routine. We all know what you are saying and why. Just say it. Stop pretending to hide it.
This!!!, the bolded in particular.
 
Actually im going to require evidence for this.
are you friggin' kidding ? "Evidence" from the chief distorter of truth on`this site? :lamo:lamo:lamo
Postmodernism has nothing to say about pedophilia as it is a rejection of grand narratives of history and the inevitable path of history.
Attempting to engage TAAC with facts is not only a waste of time and energy, it also plays into his hands in that he can thus (futilely) attempt to avoid the mockery that his dishonest posts deserve.

Just label it all as Jew hating BS and treat it with derision.

Wilhelm Reich was a nutcase and no more need be said.
 
Last edited:
are you friggin' kidding ? "Evidence" from the chief distorter of truth on`this site? :lamo:lamo:lamoAttempting to engage TAAC with facts is not only a waste of time and energy, it also plays into his hands in that he can thus (futilely) attempt to avoid the mockery that his dishonest posts deserve.

Just label it all as Jew hating BS and treat it with derision.

Wilhelm Reich was a nutcase and no more need be said.

Well it was also to point out i had no idea who this “hugely lauded” person was and i frequent quite a few leftist circles. I almost fell for his little trick but always have to remember, never give nazis the benefit of the doubt as their propaganda always involve trying to implant false memories into people.
 
Last edited:
Well it was also to point out i had no idea who this “hugely lauded” person was and i frequent quite a few leftist circles. I almost fell for his little trick but always have to remember, never give nazis the benefit of the doubt as their propaganda always involve trying to implant false memories into people.
Wise conclusion.:thumbs:

Reich, just for your information and for those interested in "truth", was disavowed by any scientific community worthy of the name, right from his start.

As someone once put it "He dragged every thesis in by the hairs, preferably by the pubic ones".

One doesn't have to speculate out of where he dragged it.

Making him representative of "the left" (or ANY denomination, for that matter) is just another one of TAAC's dishonest little games, supposedly clever but actually pathetic.

And he was of course, surprise - surprise - surprise, born to Jewish parents, thus making him ideal for feeding TAAC's favorite obsession.
 
Imagine consooming every product that Harvey Weinstein ever produced

This guy thinks people watched Miramax movies cause of the Weisteins. That's like saying people come to boxing matches so they can bet on the promoters.

That's so embarrassing.


------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about
 
Imagine a thread that supposedly had nothing to do with the Jews being turned into a thread about the Jews, by the person who constantly complains about the Jews.

Shocking.


------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about
 
This guy thinks people watched Miramax movies cause of the Weisteins. That's like saying people come to boxing matches so they can bet on the promoters.

That's so embarrassing.


------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about
Good thing my taste in coffee doesn't include Maxwell House, or I'd have to shirk away from it now.
 
Oh gosh, such faux outrage.....

How about your ***** grabbing, porn star loving cult leader?

He was too busy walking into the locker room at Miss Teen USA to care about this.
 
It appears that Netflix has picked up a film that would tickle the fancies of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. You should check the hastags on Twitter to see who is defending this film while ridiculing its critics. I've seen several Twitter accounts defending the film now, and a casual search of their Tweets reveals that they're all from Los Angeles and Tweet a lot about Trump and the ever present danger of antisemitism.

You appear by now to be really desperate for material that you can hang your Judenhass onto.

Only thing missing, at least up front, is getting "da Jooz" into it, but then you've already found the back door by which to introduce your favourite obsession.

Weisenstein -

EgEeXvmX0AAZXTw


Mendelson-

EgEecGMWoAEBbT8



These are just two examples. Oddly enough, those people who have publicly expressed support for 11 year old girls being sexualized in film, also seem to share your hyper vigilance regarding 'Judenhass'. What could it mean Chagos?
 
Imagine a thread that supposedly had nothing to do with the Jews being turned into a thread about the Jews, by the person who constantly complains about the Jews.

Shocking.


------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about

I shouldn't allow chagos to divert my threads into a discussion about his version of the master race, you're right. He tries to reframe threads that deal with the sexual exploitation of minors into an inquisition of who has sinned against the Jews. He does this in order to divert attention away from the sexual abuse of children, and onto a subject that he actually cares about, which is antisemitism. He's very tricky.
 
I shouldn't allow chagos to divert my threads into a discussion about his version of the master race, you're right. He tries to reframe threads that deal with the sexual exploitation of minors into an inquisition of who has sinned against the Jews. He does this in order to divert attention away from the sexual abuse of children, and onto a subject that he actually cares about, which is antisemitism. He's very tricky.
I enjoy that Ben Shapiro is making a push for Jewish voices to be heard in the GOP. He's pretty stupid, but he's needed.




------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about
 
I enjoy that Ben Shapiro is making a push for Jewish voices to be heard in the GOP. He's pretty stupid, but he's needed.




------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about

looool.....yeah, that's what's missing in the GOP 'Tuey.

Who are the Biggest Donors? • OpenSecrets

The real 'voices' that elected officials hear the loudest are their donors. Get a clue 'Tue.
 
Wise conclusion.:thumbs:

Reich, just for your information and for those interested in "truth", was disavowed by any scientific community worthy of the name, right from his start.

As someone once put it "He dragged every thesis in by the hairs, preferably by the pubic ones".

One doesn't have to speculate out of where he dragged it.

Making him representative of "the left" (or ANY denomination, for that matter) is just another one of TAAC's dishonest little games, supposedly clever but actually pathetic.

And he was of course, surprise - surprise - surprise, born to Jewish parents, thus making him ideal for feeding TAAC's favorite obsession.

Is that why Freud (yes THAT Freud) hired Reich and put him in charge of several teenage patients, of whom he molested, impregnated, and forced them to get abortions? One such young girl died from the result of an unsafe abortion. And all this had occurred by the time he was 22! None of this seemed to deter his future employment Chagos.
According to you, Reich was never well-received by his peers, while also being hired and promoted by the father of modern psychiatry.
 
looool.....yeah, that's what's missing in the GOP 'Tuey.

Who are the Biggest Donors? • OpenSecrets

The real 'voices' that elected officials hear the loudest are their donors. Get a clue 'Tue.
People donate in accordance with their networth. This is obvious to anyone who has one. You underestimate the ability of a silly man like Trump to not realize that it isn't tribute.

What is your point here? Jews have money? Arabs don't? Germans dont? White people don't? You wont tell me your solution to Jews having money because it doesnt go too far beyond gas chambers.


------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about
 
This guy thinks people watched Miramax movies cause of the Weisteins. That's like saying people come to boxing matches so they can bet on the promoters.

That's so embarrassing.


------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about

Weinstein paid journalists to promote his films, which were laden with left wing feels. He then paid the judges at the Academy Awards to award Oscars to his cast members and directors. He then paid politicians and judges to protect him from the justice system. The President of NBC News helped him keep nasty stories about him from being aired on any NBC broadcasts.

Imagine eagerly consooming every Hollywood product while not knowing that Hollywood is a human cesspool. That's embarrassing.
 
Last edited:
People donate in accordance with their networth. This is obvious to anyone who has one. You underestimate the ability of a silly man like Trump to not realize that it isn't tribute.

What is your point here? Jews have money? Arabs don't? Germans dont? White people don't? You wont tell me your solution to Jews having money because it doesnt go too far beyond gas chambers.


------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about

It's fairly straight forward to anyone who isn't trying to muddy the waters Hatuey. Why do you get angry over the Open Secrets list of the biggest financial donors?
 
I enjoy that Ben Shapiro is making a push for Jewish voices to be heard in the GOP. He's pretty stupid, but he's needed.

------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about

Hes claiming Chagos has a version of the master race? He confusing chagos with smart cat?
 
Weinstein paid journalists to promote his films, which were laden with left wing feels. He then paid the judges at the Academy Awards to award Oscars to his cast members and directors. He then paid politicians and judges to protect him from the justice system. The President of NBC News helped him keep nasty stories about him from being aired on any NBC broadcasts.

Imagine eagerly consooming every Hollywood product while not knowing that Hollywood is a human cesspool. That's embarrassing.

At least hollywood people can spell proper english words.
 
Which is supposed to mean what? If someone found out that Harvey Weinstein also supported a candidate they like, that makes that someone a sexual predator, too?

That someone has to then switch to supporting whatever candidate TAAC picks out ofr them, or else that someone is a sexual predator, too?

If someone liked the movies someone produced, but then found out that the procedure is a sexual predator, that makes that someone a sexual predator too?

Those attempts at smears beyond moronic.






It's more like listening to a recording of someone having explosive diahhrea on loop.

They knew all along Mr person.




Perhaps the movie going public didn't know, but the rich and powerful who rubbed elbows with Weinstein all knew. It was talked about at parties, whispered about behind his back. It's too late to pretend otherwise. We know who was fine with Weinstein's monstrous rape history Mr P. Your heroes shouldn't be your heroes anymore. It's that simple.
 
Weisenstein -

EgEeXvmX0AAZXTw


Mendelson-

EgEecGMWoAEBbT8



These are just two examples. Oddly enough, those people who have publicly expressed support for 11 year old girls being sexualized in film, also seem to share your hyper vigilance regarding 'Judenhass'. What could it mean Chagos?
It means that I attack Judenhass and its holders wherever I encounter them. By the very nature of things that includes pathological liars, seeing how the two are often identical.

Nice try of yours though to insinuate that those bashing fascist lovers like yourself are also prone to sexualize children. Unfortunately for you (and as always) your pathetic attempt at an equation doesn't work, seeing how you can't provide an example of anyone on here supporting the sexualization of children in film. Not even the director of the film.

Which, as has been amply demonstrated, isn't the object of this stupid thread of yours anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom