- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Netanyahu stands firm against demands from Obama
Netanyahu stands firm against demands from Obama - Telegraph
Israel stood firm against demands from Barack Obama on Monday to cease the construction of Jewish settlements and embrace the "two-state solution" to achieving peace in the Middle East.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, in his first meeting with the US president, made it clear that while he welcomed Mr Obama's commitment to the region, he was more concerned about dealing with the threat of Iran than peace talks.
Mr Obama was unable to secure any commitments on ceasing the construction of Jewish settlements in the West Bank or embracing the "two-state solution" to achieving peace in the Middle East.
How do you all rate Obama's meeting with netanyahu? Was it a success, and for whom?
I think netanyahu is right about Iran. It should be the focus with Obama, before talks of settlements, and a two state solution can be discussed.
What say you?
How do you all rate Obama's meeting with netanyahu? Was it a success, and for whom?
I think netanyahu is right about Iran. It should be the focus with Obama, before talks of settlements, and a two state solution can be discussed.
What say you?
Obama is such a little boy on the international stage. It would be best that we keep him home so as not to embarrass ourselves. I NEVER thought I would miss the Bush Years, but Jesus... Obama is sad. At this point, Obama just needs to focus on domestic problems. We elected two idiot children in a row. Good for us. Go Team America!
And prey tell what did Obama do that is so embarrassing in Israel? Try to get Israel to recognize a two-state solution and halt building on the settlement? Oh yeah, that's embarrassing. :roll:
Maybe he should have convinced Isreal to just slaughter every Palestinian, I'm sure that would have made many on the right happy and joyful with glee.
How do you all rate Obama's meeting with netanyahu? Was it a success, and for whom?
I think netanyahu is right about Iran. It should be the focus with Obama, before talks of settlements, and a two state solution can be discussed.
What say you?
How do you all rate Obama's meeting with netanyahu? Was it a success, and for whom?
I think netanyahu is right about Iran. It should be the focus with Obama, before talks of settlements, and a two state solution can be discussed.
What say you?
Iran and a two state solution are two separate issues, no?
Obama isn't embarrassing Israel. He is embarrassing America. And Israel ought to recognize a two-state solution, they just shouldn't be so stupid as to give up territory necessary to their own security. Simple distinctions are too complicated for Axelrod and Obama.
Not according to Obama and his staff.
Emanuel: Thwarting Iran easier with Israeli-Palestinian talks | Israel | Jerusalem PostEmanuel: Thwarting Iran easier with Israeli-Palestinian talks
May 4, 2009 21:03 | Updated May 5, 2009 9:30
The task of forming an international coalition to thwart Iran's nuclear program will be made easier if progress is made in peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has said, according to sources in Washington.
White House Chief of Staff...
Israeli TV stations had reported Monday night that Emanuel had actually linked the two matters, saying that the efforts to stop Iran hinged on peace talks with the Palestinians. The remarks were reportedly made in a closed-door meeting previous day with 300 major AIPAC donors on Sunday.
Last month, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned Israel that it risks losing Arab support for combating threats from Iran if it rejects peace negotiations with the Palestinians.
Clinton said Arab nations had conditioned helping Israel counter Iran on Jerusalem's commitment to the peace process.
How do you all rate Obama's meeting with netanyahu? Was it a success, and for whom?
I think netanyahu is right about Iran. It should be the focus with Obama, before talks of settlements, and a two state solution can be discussed.
What say you?
/sigh, please learn to read my comments.
I never said he was embarrassing Israel, I asked what did he do that was so embarrassing IN Israel?
Still waiting for examples instead of rhetoric. Given that Bush labeled countries right away as Axis of Evil, given that Darfur happened is examples of embarrasing America. But you long for those days. You long for the days when Bush attacked Iraq, a country that had LITTLE to do with the war on terror, given what was going around. But you long for those days.
Bush was an EMBARRASSMENT internationally. Get real and get off your partisan high horse and back to reality.
All you have proven is that ANYTHING Obama would do (even if you agreed with it) would be wrong because Obama did it.
Hogwash. I don't support American political parties. They are both trash. Yeah, I got a word wrong, but that doesn't change the facts. Obama is worse than Bush, which no one thought was possible. He's less intelligent, less interesting, and the only thing going for him is the press. (which should have been a sign). He would have done better on the Bachelor, if its still running. The Democrats are a joke. Stupid, Shallow, and Meaningless.
Expect Israel to strike Iran in the next.. 60 days or less.
Besides making Palestine the central part and Iran secondary..in these very talks.
Here--a summary of many recent examples from Emanuel(Chief of Staff) and Clinton(Secretary of State)
Emanuel: Thwarting Iran easier with Israeli-Palestinian talks | Israel | Jerusalem Post
Please read the news.
/sigh, please learn to read my comments.
I never said he was embarrassing Israel, I asked what did he do that was so embarrassing IN Israel?
Still waiting for examples instead of rhetoric. Given that Bush labeled countries right away as Axis of Evil, given that Darfur happened is examples of embarrasing America. But you long for those days. You long for the days when Bush attacked Iraq, a country that had LITTLE to do with the war on terror, given what was going around. But you long for those days.
Bush was an EMBARRASSMENT internationally. Get real and get off your partisan high horse and back to reality.
All you have proven is that ANYTHING Obama would do (even if you agreed with it) would be wrong because Obama did it.
Bush has what exactly to do with this topic?
If you can't read my comments or the comments I was commenting on before answering, don't bother posting a reply please. It's explained.
Here you go, this might help you in the future:
Hooked on Phonics | Learn to Read with Award-Winning Educational Programs
You don't have to thank me for helping you :mrgreen:
How do you all rate Obama's meeting with netanyahu? Was it a success, and for whom?
I think netanyahu is right about Iran. It should be the focus with Obama, before talks of settlements, and a two state solution can be discussed.
What say you?
Um Triad, it is clear you don't uderstand the difference between making it the same issue and two issues that are related to each other.
Consider yourself debunked and marked for what you are, an Obama Hater to the fullest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?