That Mrs. Livni exists, that she won the largest block in the election indicating that most Israeli don't agree with Ben, and that Ben had to form an unholy alliance with the most radical and extreme in Israel to be knighted sovreign is not applicable.
"unholy alliance"? "not applicable"? Maybe for modern haters of Am Yisrael like you. I was surprised that you didn't mention also the word "illegal". Your friends bub and G-Man, the "moral ones", love to mention that word all the time. I related to it lengthily in my previous post.
You don't have a clue what you are talking about.
The reason why
Livni isn't a prime minister and Netanyahu is a prime minister is because the majority of the Israelis voted for Netanyahu to be the prime minister.
Israel is a parliamentary democracy and in parliamentary democracy in Israel you don't have to be the chairman of the largest party (Kadima got 28 mandates and Halikud 27) in the Knesset in order to be a prime minister. Kadima and Halikud aren't the only parties in the Knesset, there are also other parties, and also 60 years ago there were other and small parties.
In order to be a prime minister in Israel there's a need of a majority of at least 61 Knesset members who will recommend the president to ask one of them own to form a government (and the ones who forms a government becomes the prime minister of course). It doesn't matter what the political opinion of the president, if there are at least 61 Knesset members who declare that they recommend one of them own to be the prime minister then the president gives him 45 days to form one and if he fails there are new elections - A thing that afaik didn't happen in Israel. Rotation is a different issue and I remember one in the mid 80's.
Netanyahu is the prime minister because he had 65 recommenders while Livni had only 44 recommenders (not exactly, she had even less because Haavoda party which could have recommended Livni - wasn't among the parties who recommended Livni) because the Arab parties (11 mandates) didn't want to recommend Livni – which means they didn't support her to be a prime minister.
Even KM Dr. Ahmad Tibi said prior to the elections: "Every vote for Kadima is another bullet in the chest of a Palestinian boy."
65>44
The Knesset members represent the public who choose them!
Israeli who voted for Shas party, didn't only vote in order to insert his Shas people to the Knesset but also voted for Netanyahu to be the prime minister because the chairman of Shas, Eli Yishai, declared prior to the elections that his party, Shas, supports Netanyahu to be the prime minister and will join his coalition.
Same goes for the ones who voted for Yisrael Beiteinu, Habayit Hayehudi, Haichud Haleumi and Yahadut Hatorah.
When Israelis voted for these parties they did it out of knowing that their people in the Knesset will recommend Netanyahu to be the prime minister, in the same way that the ones who voted for Meretz and Haavoda did it in order to support Livni or Barak, but they failed because they are minorities.
So it goes that the majority of the Israelis wanted Netanyahu to be the prime minister and the Israelis chose 65 Knesset members who support that move while the Israelis who wanted Livni to be a prime minister stayed with a minority of 44 Knesset members. Not to mention the minority of those who supported Barak, lol.
Netanyahu had 65 recommenders, you know how many recommenders Rabin had in 1992? Only 61! And among these 61 were Arab Knesset members who supported him to form a government/to be a prime minister but they refused to be members in it and didn't join his government.
So why when Rabin had only 61 recommenders it's "legitimate", "legal", "democratic", "applicable", "moderate" but when Netanyahu has 65 (which is more than 61 and much more than 44) it's "not moderate", it's "not applicable" and all the rest of the nonsense that the left and the Israeli left in particular is very good at?
In all the elections of Israel there were coalitions with small parties, afaik there wasn't a situation in which one party had a majority of 61 recommenders!
You need to give up of your own if you want to form coalitions, this is how it has always been!
Netanyahu has a strong and stable government, to Livni and her likes' chagrin.
You talk about "radical and extreme" parties in the coalition of Netanyahu? LOL, which one? Shas? Shas was also in the coalition of Olmert and of Barak's 10 years ago and also of Rabin's. Yisrael Beiteinu? Yisrael Beiteinu was also in the coalition of Olmert. Habayit Hayehudi (which was called Mafdal in the past)? Mafdal was also in the coalition of Barak. Yahadut Hatorah? It joined also left coalitions.
People who say that the Israeli politics sucks (if it's sucks then it's sucks in all the countries that follow this system) because Livni isn't a prime minister are either haters of Am Yisrael, or stupid or prefer to please the goyim -nations in Hebrew - which most of them hate Am Yisrael and not only since 1948, rather than to stand by their own nation.
Livni didn't want to join the coalition because her media adviser in the name of Eyal Arad told her that the coalition of Netanyahu will fall anyhow the following year so she'd better wait one year and then she will become a prime minister – Every Israeli who lives in Israel knows that and not because things Livni said as if Netanyahu refused to recognize in the silly saying: "2 states for 2 nations" which is nothing but an empty balloon which Livni herself and Olmert's government didn't do anything to promote this saying because they also know it's an empty balloon with no basis in reality.
So when these parties, which represent the public, are fed up with 8 years of Qassams, Grads, mortar shells, terror attacks and hundreds of attempts of terror attacks that we foiled, and support Netanyahu to be the prime minister because he declared that he will work in order to destroy Hamas' regime in Gaza - a thing that the former prime ministers didn't do and didn't declare - then you call them "radical and extreme"?
Oh, I forgot that for you (and also for the Israeli left which apart from wanting to please the enemies of Israel don't do anything), every Israeli who got out of the death camps and doesn't want to enter them again is "radical and extreme".
Netanyahu could have formed a coalition of 65 members but Netanyahu promised and declared prior to the elections that if he will be the prime minister he will work in order to form a wide coalition which means to join Kadima and Haavoda and because Netanyahu is a an honest man he had to follow his declaration and that's what he did. Unlike Rabin who lied to us Israelis. He promised us (and I remember it very well) prior to the elections of 1992 that he will never give the Golan to Syria apart from very tiny border fixings. In the end of the day he promised Assad all of the Golan. I remember that, I was an adult then, I was a citizen by then. Rabin also lied about the Oslo process. Negotiations with the enemies of Israel about parts of the land of Israel and allowing tens of thousands of Arab murderers to enter Israel - weren't part of his campaign at all, he cast it as a big surprise in the summer of 1993.
1500 Israelis were killed since then, and we continue to count them "korbanot hashalom" ("peace victims") according to Shimon Peres in the elections television confrontation of 1996.
Also regarding the UN and the other haters of Am Yisrael, it doesn't really matter for them who is the prime minister of Israel, for the likes of these it doesn't matter if Olmert is the prime minister or Livni is the prime minister or Netanyahu is the prime minister because for them haters they are all the same. The UN has recently accused Israel in committing war crimes in operation Cast Lead and barely mentioned Hamas in its report. The prime minister was Olmert, not Netanyahu.
We never interfered in your elections, why do you interfere in ours?? Or want to interfere? But we know the reason why you do.
How Arafat used to say? If you don't like it you are invited to drink the water of the Gazan sea, lol.
