• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Neil Armstrong Refuses to Swear on the Bilble that he Walked on the Moon

Pin dÁr said:
No, they didn't. They were put there by unmanned vehicles. Just like the Russian have done.

The Russians didn't claim they had put men on the moon!




It is all one big hoax!
Click to expand...
Believe as you want! I have worked with plenty of people who worked on the Apollo Missions.
In addition there are some aspects of the file from Apollo 11, that would be very difficult to fake in 1969.
Buzz Aldrin at one point just after he came down the ladder, made a test jump, back up to the first strep.
The suit weighs 180 lbs, the jump is about 3 vertical feet.
I do not think anyone could do that at 1G.
 
Pin dÁr said:
But they could do that even when there were no reflectors on the moon! they did that years before the, alleged, moonlandings!



It is all one big hoax.
Click to expand...
Even with the retro reflectors, the returning pulse is only a few hundred photons.
 
longview said:
Believe as you want! I have worked with plenty of people who worked on the Apollo Missions.
Click to expand...

yeah so? That by itself doesn't mean a thing now, does it?


In addition there are some aspects of the file from Apollo 11, that would be very difficult to fake in 1969.
Buzz Aldrin at one point just after he came down the ladder, made a test jump, back up to the first strep.
The suit weighs 180 lbs, the jump is about 3 vertical feet.
I do not think anyone could do that at 1G.
Click to expand...

maybe it is easier then you think, but it is easier for you to think it is more difficult.


It is all one big hoax.
 
longview said:
Even with the retro reflectors, the returning pulse is only a few hundred photons.
Click to expand...

What do you want to say here? They could measure the same thing years before the , alleged, moon landings.
 
Pin dÁr said:
What do you want to say here? They could measure the same thing years before the , alleged, moon landings.
Click to expand...
It is a question of resolution, the retro reflectors provide a small known reflection area.
bouncing photons off of a several mile spot on the moon, has some inherent errors, that are corrected with the reflector.
 
longview said:
It is a question of resolution, the retro reflectors provide a small known reflection area.
bouncing photons off of a several mile spot on the moon, has some inherent errors, that are corrected with the reflector.
Click to expand...

corrected? lol, are you sure or you just made this up?
 
Pin dÁr said:
corrected? lol, are you sure or you just made this up?
Click to expand...
Of this I am very sure.
Even with the highly collimated beam from a laser, the normal divergence would mean the "spot" by the
time it go to the moon could be many miles in diameter.
By using the telescope as a beam expander, the divergence is reduced to a much smaller diameter.
The retro reflector, insures a detectable number of photons are returned from a very small area.
https://www.newport.com/n/focusing-and-collimating
Without it the returning photons could have an additional error based on the diameter of the spot,
I.E. about 1 mile.
 
Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin punches oxygen thief Bart Sibrel in the mug



Higher quality version - because it is worth seeing twice

 
longview said:
Of this I am very sure.
Even with the highly collimated beam from a laser, the normal divergence would mean the "spot" by the
time it go to the moon could be many miles in diameter.
By using the telescope as a beam expander, the divergence is reduced to a much smaller diameter.
The retro reflector, insures a detectable number of photons are returned from a very small area.
https://www.newport.com/n/focusing-and-collimating
Without it the returning photons could have an additional error based on the diameter of the spot,
I.E. about 1 mile.
Click to expand...

But they could do the same thing far before the, alleged, moon landings.
 
This thread should be in the CT forum, or maybe On the Lighter Side.
 
Pin dÁr said:
But they could do the same thing far before the, alleged, moon landings.
Click to expand...
No, without the retro reflectors, the resolution would have been limited to maybe 1 mile or greater.
The retro reflectors improved the to resolution to within a few inches.
 
longview said:
No, without the retro reflectors, the resolution would have been limited to maybe 1 mile or greater.
The retro reflectors improved the to resolution to within a few inches.
Click to expand...

But still, before the aleged, moon landings they could measure it very very well.
 
You really can't take NASA, and hence the 'moon landings' seriously.

[h=1]NASA can’t find original tape of moon landing[/h]by Sam Savage



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government has misplaced
the original recording of the first moon landing, including
astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one
giant leap for mankind," a NASA spokesman said on Monday.
Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers
on July 20, 1969, is among transmissions that NASA has failed
to turn up in a year of searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma
said.
"We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking
for over a year and they haven't turned up," Hautaloma said.

NASA can't find original tape of moon landing - Redorbit
Click to expand...

Nasa couldn't find the moon landing tapes???????????????

HOW CONVENTIENT!!
 
Pin dÁr said:
But still, before the aleged, moon landings they could measure it very very well.
Click to expand...
Very well is a subjective term, there is a big difference ± 1 mile, vs ± 1 inch.
 
Manc Skipper said:
No, they couldn't.
Click to expand...

sure they could! There is evidence for that.

Furthermore there are problems with the laser and the reflectors and aren't as adeqaute as you think. This means you haven't seen the video with the lecture of Marcus Allen in which he adresses this issue!
 
Pin dÁr said:
ok, but if I show will you say that you are sorry? ;)
Click to expand...

This is boring. You can have no such evidence, because prior to the landings the resolution was insufficient to make accurate measurements.
 
Manc Skipper said:
This is boring. You can have no such evidence, because prior to the landings the resolution was insufficient to make accurate measurements.
Click to expand...

no it wasn't at all! Just another fairy tale you felt for.
 
Pin dÁr said:
You really can't take NASA, and hence the 'moon landings' seriously.



Nasa couldn't find the moon landing tapes???????????????

HOW CONVENTIENT!!
Click to expand...
Let me help you.





 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom