• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Navy to Retrofit 3 New San Diego-Based Warships to Launch Hypersonic Missiles (1 Viewer)

Rogue Valley

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
106,446
Reaction score
96,750
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Navy to Retrofit 3 New San Diego-Based Warships to Launch Hypersonic Missiles

iu

3.22.22
The Navy plans to replace the giant guns on three futuristic San Diego-based warships with launchers for new hypersonic missiles. The USS Zumwalt and USS Michael Monsoor are already in San Diego, and the future USS Lyndon B. Johnson will be based here as well. According to the nonprofit United States Naval Institute, plans are to remove the two 155mm guns from each destroyer and replace them with missile tubes for the Common Hypersonic Glide Body being developed for the Army, Air Force and the Navy. Few details have been released, but the hypersonic missiles are expected to fly at 17 times the speed of sound to attack targets nearly 2,000 miles away. Unlike ballistic missiles, they will be maneuverable in flight to avoid anti-missile systems.

San Diego-based General Atomics is one of the defense contractors working on the hypersonic program. Russia and China claim to already have working hypersonic missiles, although U.S. officials say the ones reportedly used against Ukraine were actually traditional ballistic missiles launched from aircraft. The Zumwalt will be the first destroyer converted to launching hypersonic missiles, with work completed by 2025. Though called destroyers, the three ships in the class are about the size of small World War II battleships. They are designed to focus on land-attack missions while evading detection through stealth technology.
Click to expand...


Bravo. These should eventually replace all of our Tomahawk missiles.
 
The UK is also doing a massive upgrade of the Type 45 air defence destroyer to combat hypersonic missiles.

nationalinterest.org

British Type 45 Destroyers are Getting an Epic Missile Upgrade

Here’s What You Need to Remember: According to the Defence Ministry statement, these modifications will boost the vessels’ total munitions capacity to an impressive seventy-two anti-air missiles. The first destroyer will be fully equipped with the CAMM system by the Summer of 2026. Britain’s...
nationalinterest.org nationalinterest.org

It's certainly something a lot of countries are worried about.
 
Questerr said:
They should force Lockheed to pay for it after the company failed to deliver ammo for the guns on those ships.
Click to expand...
How was the failure Lockheeds? And wasn't the "failure" more a matter of not making the ammo affordable?
 
Dayton3 said:
How was the failure Lockheeds? And wasn't the "failure" more a matter of not making the ammo affordable?
Click to expand...

Indeed. The promised the Navy (aka the taxpayers) they would deliver functioning ammo at a specific price, then when the Navy was locked in to building guns that could only use that ammo, they jacked up the price by more than 50 times.
 
Questerr said:
Indeed. The promised the Navy (aka the taxpayers) they would deliver functioning ammo at a specific price, then when the Navy was locked in to building guns that could only use that ammo, they jacked up the price by more than 50 times.
Click to expand...
Did they give reasons?
 
Questerr said:
Indeed. The promised the Navy (aka the taxpayers) they would deliver functioning ammo at a specific price, then when the Navy was locked in to building guns that could only use that ammo, they jacked up the price by more than 50 times.
Click to expand...
and the U.S. Navy said they were going to build a lot more than THREE Zumwalt class destroyers. When the U.S. Navy cut the Zumwalt class program to only three ships it radically jacked up the unit prices of the ammunition being ordered for their guns.

Lockheed isn't responsible for the idiosyncrasies of U.S. naval procurement.

Long Range Land Attack Projectile - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
Luce said:
To get a teaching degree?

Fascinating.
Click to expand...
I never got a teaching degree. I got a business administration degree which required so many hours of Business Law.
 
"The Zumwalt will be the first destroyer converted to launching hypersonic missiles, with work completed by 2025."

Thanks for the comic relief. The first phase of Operation Hyper Speed might be completed by 2030, years after World War Three has started. These zillion dollar weapons will finish any survivors off and put them out of their misery (if they even work properly), toot sweet.

"UUUUUNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGG"
 
Dayton3 said:
and the U.S. Navy said they were going to build a lot more than THREE Zumwalt class destroyers. When the U.S. Navy cut the Zumwalt class program to only three ships it radically jacked up the unit prices of the ammunition being ordered for their guns.

Lockheed isn't responsible for the idiosyncrasies of U.S. naval procurement.

Long Range Land Attack Projectile - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...

The production line should have been seized and produced by the government at unit cost with zero markup going to corporate profits.
 
Left-libertarians should seize the means of weapons of mass destruction production.
 
Antiwar said:
Left-libertarians should seize the means of weapons of mass destruction production.
Click to expand...

155mm artillery shells are not weapons of mass destruction.

But then again, what do you know? You think countries have to be too weak to defend themselves in order to not be militarist.
 
I didn't say 155 mm shells, straw left-libertarian. I took your most excellent idea further "left-libertarian."
 
Antiwar said:
I didn't say 155 mm shells, straw left-libertarian. I took your most excellent idea further "left-libertarian."
Click to expand...

Ah so you aren't talking about the topic I was. You're just trolling.
 
Questerr said:
The production line should have been seized and produced by the government at unit cost with zero markup going to corporate profits.
Click to expand...
Why? Given the Zumwalt class was canceled after only three ships built I doubt the Navy was that interested in having them or their six total guns and ammunition.
 
Dayton3 said:
Why? Given the Zumwalt class was canceled after only three ships built I doubt the Navy was that interested in having them or their six total guns and ammunition.
Click to expand...

Because now they have six guns that can't even fire that we spent billions of dollars on.
 
Questerr said:
Ah so you aren't talking about the topic I was. You're just trolling.
Click to expand...

The thread topic is Operation Hyper Speed. If you want to discuss your most excellent socialist seizure of the means of military ammunition production of a specific size-- go ahead, make your day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom