• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nancy Pelosi Is Withholding Articles of Impeachment From Senate

“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, what Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great,” Trump said this to Zelensky in the call!

Trump then said, “Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it, it sounds horrible to me.”

Where is the "inference"? This all came right out of Trump's own filthy, lying mouth every word of it.

Screenshot-2019-12-22-Ukraine-call-with-Trump-Government-Politic.png


Screenshot-2019-12-22-Ukraine-call-with-Trump-Government-Politic.png


It is just plain WRONG for an United States President ask a foreign government to interject themselves in any way into OUR ELECTIONS!!

It should be pointed out here (again) that nothing actually happenned as a result of the phone call. The funds were released; no investigation required.

However, we know that in 2016, the Obama Admin actually used information from Russia, Australia and the UK to investigate the Trump campaign (that is, from foreign countries).

If you wish to say Trump should never have mentioned Bidens name, no argument. But-- no harm, no foul.
That cannot be said as to what happenned in 2016.
 
Trump has the right to deny all executive privilege requests by the house and the house has every right to challenge those executive privilege requests in court and the judiciary (SCOTUS) has every right to decide if the Trump executive privileges are valid.:shrug:

Well, the House of Representatives disagrees with you. See the impeachment vote tally from Wednesday night.
 
It should be pointed out here (again) that nothing actually happenned as a result of the phone call. The funds were released; no investigation required.

However, we know that in 2016, the Obama Admin actually used information from Russia, Australia and the UK to investigate the Trump campaign (that is, from foreign countries).

If you wish to say Trump should never have mentioned Bidens name, no argument. But-- no harm, no foul.
That cannot be said as to what happenned in 2016.

It should also be pointed out that if a man goes into a bank with a gun and points it at the cashier then changes his mind and leaves the bank, he's still going to be arrested for attempted bank robbery which is a crime because it shows intent.

The countries you've mentioned are all part of the Five Eyes and partnered with the CIA who were doing counterintelligence on the Trump campaign because of Paul Manafort.
 
Those racist census takers!!!!!!

Lol..dems accuse others of racism...meanwhile...their top candidate. Joe Biden said in reference to Obama...
I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,"
Myyyyyyyyy what stank hypocrites.
 
Lol..dems accuse others of racism...meanwhile...their top candidate. Joe Biden said in reference to Obama...
I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,"
Myyyyyyyyy what stank hypocrites.

Those awful racists at the census are dividing us by race!!!!!!!
 
Trump has the right to deny all executive privilege requests by the house and the house has every right to challenge those executive privilege requests in court and the judiciary (SCOTUS) has every right to decide if the Trump executive privileges are valid.:shrug:

Of course Trump has this authority...the left knows this as well....not their useful idiot base but I'm talking the House and Senate democrats would OF COURSE know this thats why they know immediately one of their Articles will be flipped out of the Senate the second Pelosi sends them. On the other Article...Senate dems know they can't support them based on the 0 evidence the house pretends they have. Nancy has painted herself into a corner. Her only choice is to sit on the articles. Where better to store this partisan attack on a sitting President than up Pelosi's butt.
 
Those awful racists at the census are dividing us by race!!!!!!!
Good to see lefties supporting racism. We all knew you were full of **** on that. Biden the guy who sorts african Americans as being "clean" or not is your guy..well there goes your race card. Lol and here you lefties were pulling down statues of the forefathers and civil war generals for being racists. Such full of **** they are. Do you guys have anymore white folk skin color comments or are we done pointing out skin color?
 
Good to see lefties supporting racism. We all knew you were full of **** on that. Biden the guy who sorts african Americans as being "clean" or not is your guy..well there goes your race card. Lol and here you lefties were pulling down statues of the forefathers and civil war generals for being racists. Such full of **** they are. Do you guys have anymore white folk skin color comments or are we done pointing out skin color?

Yeah I like white folk.

And black folk too. Lol
 
Yeah I like white folk.

And black folk too. Lol
Not according to left wing posts. But good to see you differentiating between white and black folk. Me on the otherhand...I just see folk....you see I'm not a racist unlike the left who pretend others are racists while at the same time supporting Joe "clean for an African American" biden. You guys crack me up with your blatant hypocrisy. I mean the fascinating part is you aren't even embarrassed when you get caught in the hypocrisy.
 
Not according to left wing posts. But good to see you differentiating between white and black folk. Me on the otherhand...I just see folk....you see I'm not a racist unlike the left who pretend others are racists while at the same time supporting Joe "clean for an African American" biden. You guys crack me up with your blatant hypocrisy. I mean the fascinating part is you aren't even embarrassed when you get caught in the hypocrisy.

Oh I see color. I know that people are black and I know that people are white.

That must be a very serious eye condition you have
 
Oh I see color. I know that people are black and I know that people are white.

That must be a very serious eye condition you have

I see color too...the difference is that different colors matter to you and not to me.
 
I see color too...the difference is that different colors matter to you and not to me.

It does matter. Very much. When someone says to me they are a proud black man I tell them I am proud of them too.
 
It should be pointed out here (again) that nothing actually happenned as a result of the phone call. The funds were released; no investigation required.

However, we know that in 2016, the Obama Admin actually used information from Russia, Australia and the UK to investigate the Trump campaign (that is, from foreign countries).

If you wish to say Trump should never have mentioned Bidens name, no argument. But-- no harm, no foul.
That cannot be said as to what happenned in 2016.

Do you think Trump would've released the funds if he hadn't been outed by the WB? Because no one with a rational mind does.

FACT: Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Trump. The investigation was warranted and justified.

Trump had criminal intent to pressure Zelensky for his own personal gain....and his actions emboldened Russia and put US national security at risk.


The Dems were too kind not to charge him for treason.
 
It does matter. Very much. When someone says to me they are a proud black man I tell them I am proud of them too.
Hahahhahahha. I'm glad you feel that they need your affirmation. How Joe Biden of you. Do you assess their cleanliness like your democrat racist leader does?
 
Hahahhahahha. I'm glad you feel that they need your affirmation. How Joe Biden of you. Do you assess their cleanliness like your democrat racist leader does?

I believe in positive affirmations. Do you know Colbert used to do a bit on his show about how he could not see color in people? It was really funny.


I see the differences in people....and I celebrate them.


Try it sometime
 
I believe in positive affirmations. Do you know Colbert used to do a bit on his show about how he could not see color in people? It was really funny.


I see the differences in people....and I celebrate them.


Try it sometime

Hahhahah ooookkkkayy...have any other people with different skin color felt the need to garner your affirmation? Glad to see people proud of their skin color....oh wait...when white people say it you call them racists...hhhhahahahhaha soooo full of absolute ****.
 
Hahhahah ooookkkkayy...have any other people with different skin color felt the need to garner your affirmation? Glad to see people proud of their skin color....oh wait...when white people say it you call them racists...hhhhahahahhaha soooo full of absolute ****.

Being black is so much more than skin color. It is an entire history and culture. You really have a lot to.learn about cultural awareness.


Open your eyes. See the diversity and celebrate it
 
Question...
Nancy Pelosi is not sending the two articles of impeachment to the Senate. Why?

Because she realizes this impeachment shenanigan is nothing but a cheap scam with no validity. Our President Trump has done nothing wrong. The lowly liberal/Demo continues to throw a monkey wrench into the Trump Administration. Nancy,like queen wannabe hillary wants to destroy our President with such hatred and it's not going to work and she knows it. There will never be any hearings...Merry Christmas.
 
Being black is so much more than skin color. It is an entire history and culture. You really have a lot to.learn about cultural awareness.


Open your eyes. See the diversity and celebrate it

Hear, hear.
 
Being black is so much more than skin color. It is an entire history and culture. You really have a lot to.learn about cultural awareness.


Open your eyes. See the diversity and celebrate it
Yeah...I just learned from you that black people need to come to you for affirmation. That seems like everything MLK was working against but hey... as long as you feel good about making stories up about black people coming to you to tell you they are proud and you giving them affirm....lol...ation....then you keep up the stories. They are hilarious.
 
Yeah...I just learned from you that black people need to come to you for affirmation. That seems like everything MLK was working against but hey... as long as you feel good about making stories up about black people coming to you to tell you they are proud and you giving them affirm....lol...ation....then you keep up the stories. They are hilarious.

They dont need to but if they do they will get it.


Will they get it from you?
 
They dont need to but if they do they will get it.


Will they get it from you?
No...I'm not a racist as I have stated. Skin color is no reason to be proud. The content of your character is. Just like MLK told you. I dont pat people on the back and patronzie them about being proud of their skin color. That's what racists do.
 
No...I'm not a racist as I have stated. Skin color is no reason to be proud. The content of your character is. Just like MLK told you. I dont pat people on the back and patronzie them about being proud of their skin color. That's what racists do.

You are certainly entitled to that opinion.
 
It should also be pointed out that if a man goes into a bank with a gun and points it at the cashier then changes his mind and leaves the bank, he's still going to be arrested for attempted bank robbery which is a crime because it shows intent.

The countries you've mentioned are all part of the Five Eyes and partnered with the CIA who were doing counterintelligence on the Trump campaign because of Paul Manafort.

It continues to be a bad analogy: it is illegal to rob a bank, and to attempt to rob a bank.
It's not illegal to place conditions upon foreign aid.

Where does information from Russia factor into the legitimacy of using foreign information to investigate a presidential candidate?
Is anti-Trump info from Russia more credible than anti-Biden info Ukraine (which, needs to be stressed, the latter was never received but the former was)?
 
Do you think Trump would've released the funds if he hadn't been outed by the WB? Because no one with a rational mind does.

FACT: Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Trump. The investigation was warranted and justified.

Trump had criminal intent to pressure Zelensky for his own personal gain....and his actions emboldened Russia and put US national security at risk.


The Dems were too kind not to charge him for treason.

Congress had already threatened to withhold Defense spending if the Ukraine funds were not released.
That caused the re lease.

Biden said what he said at a time his son worked where he worked. That, and those comments by those Ukranian legislators, is far more than what existed for the Obama Admin to suspect the Trump campaign was conspiring with Russia.
 
Back
Top Bottom