• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mussolini and Hitler were right wing dictators

That as a non answer let me try again
When did the Nazis nationalize manufacturing?
13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.
 
13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.
Ill try again
When did the Nazis nationalize manufacturing?
 
Historically, left-wing parties were more racist than conservative ones. Democratic candidates were officially endorsed by the Klan until the 1940s, including President Wilson. The Democrats passed a series of anti-Asian laws in the early 20th century to protect American workers. Left-wing parties only started preaching tolerance in the 1960s. It was House Republicans who passed an anti-lynching bill in January 1922.
 
Ill try again
When did the Nazis nationalize manufacturing?
Apparently you have a reading problem. I'm not here to teach English, sorry.
 
“In my eyes,” Erhard confided in January 1962, “power is always dull, it is dangerous, it is brutal and ultimately even dumb.”

By every measure, Germany was a disaster in 1945—defeated, devastated, divided, and demoralized—and not only because of the war. The Nazis, of course, were socialist (the name derives from National Socialist German Workers Party), so for more than a decade the German economy had been “planned” from the top. It was tormented with price controls, rationing, bureaucracy, inflation, cronyism, cartels, misdirection of resources, and government command of important industries. Producers made what the planners ordered them to. Service to the state was the highest value.

Ludwig Erhard reversed those practices, and in doing so he gave birth to a miraculous economic recovery.

 
“In my eyes,” Erhard confided in January 1962, “power is always dull, it is dangerous, it is brutal and ultimately even dumb.”

By every measure, Germany was a disaster in 1945—defeated, devastated, divided, and demoralized—and not only because of the war. The Nazis, of course, were socialist (the name derives from National Socialist German Workers Party), so for more than a decade the German economy had been “planned” from the top. It was tormented with price controls, rationing, bureaucracy, inflation, cronyism, cartels, misdirection of resources, and government command of important industries. Producers made what the planners ordered them to. Service to the state was the highest value.

Ludwig Erhard reversed those practices, and in doing so he gave birth to a miraculous economic recovery.


The Communist Marshall Plan <BP spits on the floor again> helped a fair amount.

MAGA.
 
The Communist Marshall Plan <BP spits on the floor again> helped a fair amount.

MAGA.
The feverish maintenance of the war effort engulfed all aspects of national economics. Machinery has fallen into disrepair or is entirely obsolete. Under the arbitrary and destructive Nazi rule, virtually every possible enterprise was geared into the German war machine. Long-standing commercial ties, private institutions, banks, insurance companies, and shipping companies disappeared, through the loss of capital, absorption through nationalization, or by simple destruction. In many countries, confidence in the local currency has been severely shaken. The breakdown of the business structure of Europe during the war was complete. Recovery has been seriously retarded by the fact that 2 years after the close of hostilities a peace settlement with Germany and Austria has not been agreed upon. But even given a more prompt solution of these difficult problems, the rehabilitation of the economic structure of Europe quite evidently will require a much longer time and greater effort than had been foreseen.

excerpt of Secretary of State George Marshall's Speech
 
Apparently you have a reading problem. I'm not here to teach English, sorry.
Either you fail to understand the question or are unable to answer it
 
The feverish maintenance of the war effort engulfed all aspects of national economics. Machinery has fallen into disrepair or is entirely obsolete. Under the arbitrary and destructive Nazi rule, virtually every possible enterprise was geared into the German war machine. Long-standing commercial ties, private institutions, banks, insurance companies, and shipping companies disappeared, through the loss of capital, absorption through nationalization, or by simple destruction. In many countries, confidence in the local currency has been severely shaken. The breakdown of the business structure of Europe during the war was complete. Recovery has been seriously retarded by the fact that 2 years after the close of hostilities a peace settlement with Germany and Austria has not been agreed upon. But even given a more prompt solution of these difficult problems, the rehabilitation of the economic structure of Europe quite evidently will require a much longer time and greater effort than had been foreseen.

excerpt of Secretary of State George Marshall's Speech
When did Germany go into a full war economy?
When did the allied nations go into a full war economy?
 
Either you fail to understand the question or are unable to answer it
You have failed to comprehend the answer multiple times. Sorry you’re having trouble, but I can’t fix it for you.
 
You have failed to comprehend the answer multiple times. Sorry you’re having trouble, but I can’t fix it for you.
You have failed to actually answer the question.
Do you not understand the question?

I suspect it is more likely a case of you not actually being able to answer what was asked so you divert with irrelevancy
 
You have failed to actually answer the question.
Do you not understand the question?

I suspect it is more likely a case of you not actually being able to answer what was asked so you divert with irrelevancy
I have provided the answer to “when” in both of my responses. You simply have a problem with comprehension. Or some other issue that prevents your marble from falling in the hole.
 
Your book doesn't define political theory now, does it? There is nothing fundamentally left or right wing about a large, authoritarian central government. There have been right wing dictatorships, and there have been left wing dictatorships.
I mean, not really, unless you count the left wanting more, bigger, central government involvement.

But if you can dodge that then sure, nothing fundamentally left about wanting a large authoritarian central government ...
 
I mean, not really, unless you count the left wanting more, bigger, central government involvement.

But if you can dodge that then sure, nothing fundamentally left about wanting a large authoritarian central government ...
The Nazis and fascists in America today know which side they are on, that is why they organize "Unite the Right" rallies, not Unite the left Rallies, and come out in support of Republican causes and candidates.
 
The Nazis and fascists in America today know which side they are on, that is why they organize "Unite the Right" rallies, not Unite the left Rallies, and come out in support of Republican causes and candidates.
If they side with the right, it certainly isn't due to the governmental control aspect (which is what was being discussed)

Likely it is much more akin to the 'other side has all the minorities' aversion, perhaps?
 
The Nazis and fascists in America today know which side they are on, that is why they organize "Unite the Right" rallies, not Unite the left Rallies, and come out in support of Republican causes and candidates.
And Biden gave the eulogy at Hillary Clinton’s mentor and Former KKK leader. Gee other than David Duke giving unwanted support your statement is grossly misleading.
 
If they side with the right, it certainly isn't due to the governmental control aspect (which is what was being discussed)

Likely it is much more akin to the 'other side has all the minorities' aversion, perhaps?
The only candidate that wants an authoritarian gov. Is Trump, the Nazis and Fascists love him and support him. They want an right wing authoritarian pres. That's Trump.

I agree with your second point though.
 
And Biden gave the eulogy at Hillary Clinton’s mentor and Former KKK leader. Gee other than David Duke giving unwanted support your statement is grossly misleading.
No, it's not misleading, the Charlottesville rally, organized by nazis, was called the Unite the Right rally because Nazis and Fascists are right wing, in spite of your denials.

Here is more.







Need more?
 
I have provided the answer to “when” in both of my responses. You simply have a problem with comprehension. Or some other issue that prevents your marble from falling in the hole.
You didnt answer my actual question Ill try again
When did the Nazis nationalize manufacturing?

Do you need a dictionary to comprehend the bolded word?
 
The only candidate that wants an authoritarian gov. Is Trump, the Nazis and Fascists love him and support him. They want an right wing authoritarian pres. That's Trump.
Look, I could give a shit about Trump. It may or may not be true, I am not talking about Trump.

I am talking about conservatives and liberals/progressives want a much broader, central government.
I agree with your second point though.
 
Look, I could give a shit about Trump. It may or may not be true, I am not talking about Trump.
I am talking about Trump because he is the frontrunner for the GOP nomination, wants to be an authoritarian, and the Nazis love him

I am talking about conservatives and liberals/progressives want a much broader, central government.
Yet fascists and nazis are right wing, have always been defined as right wing, and still consider themselves right wing.

fascism n.

1 an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.

 
No, it's not misleading, the Charlottesville rally, organized by nazis, was called the Unite the Right rally because Nazis and Fascists are right wing, in spite of your denials.

Here is more.







Need more?
None of those sources are credible.
 
I am talking about Trump because he is the frontrunner for the GOP nomination, wants to be an authoritarian, and the Nazis love him


Yet fascists and nazis are right wing, have always been defined as right wing, and still consider themselves right wing.

fascism n.

1 an authoritarian and nationalistic fixed system of government and social organization.

Whoever added 'right-wing' to the description was simply wishing because that is certainly NOT conservative.
 
Back
Top Bottom