• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Multiple Texas Farms Shut Down After ‘Almost 100%’ Of Workforce Vanishes Overnight

That makes no sense. Your source says there is an estimated 5.4 million active ITINs. So you're saying every single ITIN is used by an illegal immigrant?
No that is definitely not the case. Other people who are ineligible for an SSN use an ITIN.
 
So then his statement makes no sense.
The document he referenced claimed $100 billion in federal, STATE AMD LOCAL taxes. That's perfectly plausible. The yearly estimates I've seen - and I gave you a link to some - of federal taxes are about $6 billion in FICA and $20 billion in payroll tax. It varies by year.

This site gives a breakdown of how the estimates are calculated.
 
Last edited:
ITIN isn't use to pay the IRS, rather its used to get back withholding and apply for additional government benefits.
Why do you claim this when it is in no way true? Try actually looking it up - you have google. Or are you uninterested in the truth?
 
The document he referenced claimed $100 billion in federal, STATE AMD LOCAL taxes. That's perfectly plausible. The yearly estimates I've seen - and I gave you a link to some - of federal taxes are about $6 billion in FICA and $20 billion in payroll tax. It varies by year.

This site gives a breakdown of how the estimates are calculated.
Did you look at the methodology? They just take percentages and reduce and increase figures arbitrarily:
We adjust for an expected undercount of 13 percent for those immigrants who arrived in the most recent year, with that rate declining by 7.5

A quick glance reveals they're not even making their guesses based on correct assumptions, such as:
Round 3: Disqualify people within this universe who receive public assistance for which undocumented individuals are ineligible.

They didn't actually define what services they were eligible and ineligible for here, so I searched their site:
Undocumented immigrants are already excluded from Medicaid
But we know that's not true because NYC publicly states they provide Medicaid to illegals.
 
Did you look at the methodology? They just take percentages and reduce and increase figures arbitrarily:


A quick glance reveals they're not even making their guesses based on correct assumptions, such as:


They didn't actually define what services they were eligible and ineligible for here, so I searched their site:
I will look at the methodology tomorrow.
But we know that's not true because NYC publicly states they provide Medicaid to illegals.
Oh come on. It is medicaid assistance for pregnant women and emergencies in NYC. The vast majority of unauthorized immigrants (that's the offical IRS term) do not receive it.
 
I will look at the methodology tomorrow.

Oh come on. It is medicaid assistance for pregnant women and emergencies in NYC.
And children.
The vast majority of unauthorized immigrants (that's the offical IRS term) do not receive it.
The point is they're making arbitrary assumptions and not even basing them on facts. I looked at the thing for a few minutes and already found this major error, and I'm not even an expert here, just some random guy arguing on the internet after doing 5 minutes of research.

Here's another state:
Immigration Status Doesn't Matter
Eligibility You may be eligible for full Medi-Cal if you: Live in California Meet income and household eligibility requirements
 
What's that reason? Money or skin color?
Most of those workers are like other workers wanting to provide for family
Your need to offend has made your questions incomprehensible.
 
Illegals can't get work authorization since they have no legal status in the US, so they can't get Social Security Numbers, so they can't go on a W-2. There's no way to properly report it. Crack dealers probably have an easier time reporting their income and paying taxes! I'm sure you think they all pay taxes, too.
Smh it’s called an ITIN number.
 
That would be the pain part resulting from illegally entering the country.
The gain part would be what you said "I like this idea." to, which would be acquired upon legal entry.

I live abroad where all persons age 7 or more are legally required to carry an ID card or valid passport containing a valid visa and show it when asked by police, immigration officers, or military roadblocks. A photocopy or image on my phone usually suffices, though the immigration office requires original documents.
Military roadblocks and police without probable cause would violate the Constitution. I don’t give a rats ass what some authoritarian regimes in some other country did
 
There are those who have entered legally and those who have entered illegally.
I would require legal entry to be the only way to prevent being deported, unless they've broken some other law that requires being deported.
Most people carry a wallet to hold their money, how difficult would it be to put their smart card in their wallet?
Why should a citizen be forced to prove they are a citizen
 
Military roadblocks and police without probable cause would violate the Constitution. I don’t give a rats ass what some authoritarian regimes in some other country did
So continue doing nothing?
 
So continue doing nothing?
We do plenty to the tune of $20 billion every year just for Border Patrol.
We don’t have a presumption of guilt in this country and don’t require citizens to prove their innocence. Read and learn the 4th and 5th amendment. Im going to assume you weren’t born in the USA since you asked why not
 
We do plenty to the tune of $20 billion every year just for Border Patrol.
We don’t have a presumption of guilt in this country and don’t require citizens to prove their innocence. Read and learn the 4th and 5th amendment. Im going to assume you weren’t born in the USA since you asked why not
How would you differ a legal resident from an illegal resident?
 
Wrong. The government has to prove guilt a person doesn’t have to testify against themselves.
How would you know someone is undocumented by looking at them?
As I asked, how would you suggest it be done?
 
You don’t unless they are caught at the border or when arrested for a crime or stopped for a traffic violation.
So keep doing what we've been doing for decades?
 
As I asked, how would you suggest it be done?
I told you. We follow the Constitution dude. If a person is stopped for a traffic violation or committing a crime you have the right to probable cause and if they have no valid US ID it creates that. I don’t care if you don’t like our Constitution my ancestors fought and died for this country and the principles in our Constitution on one side of my family
 
Back
Top Bottom