What evidence? They have merely stated this, not demonstrated it. Do you understand what "evidence" is?
We're past the point of not doing anything. The ramifications of doing nothing, at this point, will be worse.
You know, they don't actually give any data or cite any sources. Again, you do know what "evidence" is, don't you?
First off, that's not data, those are just statements. Statements are not "evidence". You don't seem to understand what evidence is.
Secondly, even there they claim "high confidence" which is not incontrovertible.
What is your evidence otherwise?
I said that we do not know. And we don't. The US has just made assertions because they want to go in. Infinity war is good for fascism. Others, such as Russia, suggest that the attacks were perpetrated by another group. So the truth is, we don't know. And "we don't know" isn't enough for invasion and slaughter.
Do you have evidence counter to that presented by the president of the US?
I'm not claiming knowledge
MoveOn, their "journalists" let alone their sycophants, does not have the evidence afforded congress.
I expected to go thru life believing that no one was naive enough to believe that any branch of the US govt. has any credibility on anything that transpires in the world.
Today, that wish has ended.
That's right, you're claiming hysterical fundie muzzie Trutherism.
Nope, just lack of evidence.
Unless you believe that thousands of US government agencies and agents are all faking it; unless you believe that a conspiracy of thousands lacks a whistleblower of a trillion dollars payout...
There's evidence.
Faking what? They didn't produce anything but a statement, that's not evidence.
Christ on a pogo stick, go back to school and take some science courses, you have no idea what constitutes evidence.
"All evidence is fake"
And the moon landing was fake.
:cuckoo:
Unless you believe that thousands of US government agencies and agents are all faking it;
There's evidence.
We're past the point of not doing anything. The ramifications of doing nothing, at this point, will be worse.
Relax, dudes. Big O has no plans to attack Syria. If he wanted to, he certainly wouldn't have asked Congress.
The whole thing was a ploy to keep Dems from losing the 2016 election by losing votes from moronic war-mongering conservatives who think all Dems are sissies because they don't drop as many bombs as GOP pols. If O looks tough, then he makes the Dems look good in GOP-voter eyes comes 2016.
That has to be perhaps the stupidest bit of analysis on the subject that I've heard to date.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?