• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More evidence flynn is innocent and stzock and mccabe lied.

iLOL
Still laughing at your stupid posts.


So, are you saying that attempting to withdraw a plea (made under coercion) after the person gets new counsel, is nonsense?
If that is what you are asserting, that is the nonsense and you should go peddle elsewhere.
 

The court order was issued after prosecutors admitted accidently altered documents -- notes written by former FBI agent Peter Strzok and former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe -- were used.

“The government has acknowledged that altered FBI records have been produced by the government and filed on the record in this case,” noted Judge Emmet Sullivan

The order from Sullivan comes as the government again requested the judge dismiss the criminal case against Flynn, a move Sullivan has so far resisted.

this is easy they say the evidence is not true and go arrest mccabe and stzok on multiple charges.

"Accidentally altering documents."

That alone is a new trial, regardless of whatever the judge thinks.
 
"Accidentally altering documents."

That alone is a new trial, regardless of whatever the judge thinks.

A "new" trial? Of who, Attorney General Barr and former POTUS Trump?

If you read the thread and not nuzzle up for your "mother's milk" Trump TV foxnews disinfo, last week's fake news if you check the date, you might learn that the DOJ who last May, filed a fraudulant motion-to-dismiss-with-prejudice, conspire with Flynn and his Fox News talking head lawyer, Sidney Powell, forcing all of the non-political appointee prosecutors to quit the case in disgust, you might have learned that the Trump-Barr stooges could not comply with the Judge's order, but filed some papers, anyway.

This is turning into a career ending poop show... Judge Sullivan is likely to be unimpressed with these misrepresentations...

The department claimed late Monday that it had consulted with lawyers for former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe and former FBI agent Peter Strzok and confirmed that two sets of handwritten notes — key evidence in Flynn’s case — were valid and free of any alterations.

But correspondence between the two attorneys and DOJ reveal that neither vouched for the accuracy of the documents. In fact, McCabe's lawyer Michael Bromwich and Strzok's lawyer Aitan Goelman affirmatively refused to do so, according to a review of their email exchanges with Assistant U.S. Attorney Jocelyn Ballantine.


 
iLOL
Still laughing at your stupid posts.


-snip-

Where'd you run off, to?

"..DOJ submitted multiple versions of the same document with different Bates stamps, in others, when they resubmitted exhibits they retained the Bates stamp. That’s … not a legal process reflecting any regularity.
DOJ STILL PRETENDS TO HAVE NO ****ING CLUE ABOUT DOCUMENTS THEY RELIED ON IN THE MOTION TO DISMISS"

EAD Brown's fling, in response to Sullivan's order...


Judge Sullivan's order :


Oct 23, 2020
MINUTE ORDER as to MICHAEL T. FLYNN. During the Sept 29, 2020 motion hearing, the Court informed the government that it would need government counsel to authenticate documents filed with the Court. See Hr'g Tr., ECF No. 266 at 91:19-92-21; see also Min. Order (Sept. 29, 2020) (ordering the parties to file any supplemental materials by no later than October 7, 2020). On October 7, 2020, the government filed 259 Notice of Compliance in which it stated that: (1) Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") agents assigned to review Mr. Strzok's notes had placed sticky notes on the document with estimated dates, and the sticky notes had not been removed prior to scanning the documents for production purposes (see ECF Nos. 248-2, 248-3); and (2) a sticky note with an estimated date had been placed on the notes of Andrew McCabe, and the sticky note had not been removed prior to scanning the document for production purposes (see ECF No. 248-4). The government stated that the notes of Mr. Strzok and Mr. McCabe were otherwise unaltered, and it provided the unaltered versions of Mr. Strzok's and Mr. McCabe's notes. See Exs. to Notice of Compliance, ECF Nos. 259-1, 259-2, 259-3. However, the government did not address the Court's authentication request despite the government's acknowledgement that altered FBI records have been produced to Mr. Flynn and filed on the record in this case. See Notice of Compliance, ECF No. 259. The government has filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a), has attached 13 Exhibits to that motion, and has cited the Exhibits throughout its motion to support its description of the factual background and its argument in support of dismissal. See generally Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 198. The government has also filed a supplement to its motion and attached an Exhibit to that supplement. Suppl., ECF No. 249. Although the government relies heavily on these 14 Exhibits, the government has not provided a declaration attesting that the Exhibits are true and correct copies. "The presumption [of regularity] applies to government-produced documents" and "to the extent it is not rebutted--requires a court to treat the government's record as accurate." Latif v. Obama, 666 F.3d 746, 748, 750 (D.C. Cir. 2011). Here, however, the government has acknowledged that altered FBI records have been produced by the government and filed on the record in this case. See Notice of Compliance, ECF No. 259. Accordingly, the government is HEREBY ORDERED to file, by no later than Oct 26, 2020, a declaration pursuant to penalty of perjury under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1746 in support of its motion to dismiss that the Exhibits attached to its motion and supplement are true and correct copies. It is ..ORDERED that the government's declaration shall identify each exhibit by name, date, and author. It is ..ORDERED that the government shall provide transcriptions of all handwritten notes contained in the Exhibits. The government has also filed on the record in this case numerous notices of filing discovery correspondence and Mr. Flynn has generally filed the discovery produced on the record in this case as Exhibits to his supplementary filings. See ECF Nos. 228, 231, 237, 248, 251, 257, 264 . The government has acknowledged that the discovery provided to Mr. Flynn and thereafter filed on the record contained altered FBI records. See Notice of Compliance, ECF No. 259. Accordingly, the government is HEREBY ORDERED to file, by no later than Oct 26, 2020, a declaration pursuant to penalty of perjury under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1746 that the discovery documents provided to Mr. Flynn and filed on the record in this case are true and correct copies. It is ..ORDERED that the government's declaration shall identify each discovery document by name, date, and author. It is..ORDERED that the government shall provide transcriptions of all handwritten notes contained in the Exhibits. ."
 
Where'd you run off, to?
Still posting irrelevant nothings I see. Figures.

Run off? Doh! Hilarious.
Btw, if you can't tell; Still laughing at your postings.
 
Back
Top Bottom