Moms Demand Action Has No Business Existing

[PeacefulWarrior]

Full automatic weapons aren’t banned.

EGG ZACK LEE!!!


And semiautomatic weapons won't actually be "banned" either.

 

[CLAX1911]

You don't really need to do shooting sports,

But if I'm doing them then I need a fire arm I can't do them without one.

unless, perhaps there is some sort of addiction.

You don't need a firearm because you don't need to enter that competition.

You do need one if you want to do the competition.

 

[Spock]

But if I'm doing them then I need a fire arm I can't do them without one.



You do need one if you want to do the competition.

false premise. You do not need to do a sport that involves a firearm and all subsequent claims are therefore unnecessary.

 

[Spock]

I just told you I need them. Surely reading isn't that difficult.

Firearms are luxuries.
If you really, really, really, really need a gun, then you should not have it.

The remainder of your post is repetitious gibberish.

 

[Biznawich]

I could definitely support Bloomberg, I was hoping to get the chance to vote for him for President but alas it wasn't to be.

...yeah, he was probably way too busy stroking the worthless stone sacks of Chinese communist business interests anyway...

 

[PeacefulWarrior]

...yeah, he was probably way too busy stroking the worthless stone sacks of Chinese communist business interests anyway...

Man you sure do think about some weird stuff Friend!

 

[CLAX1911]

false premise.

No it's proof that you could need one. You must have a shotgun in order to do a shotgun competition.

You didn't ask me to prove somebody needed to do a shotgun competition so you moved the goalposts when I stomped your crappy little argument.

You do not need to do a sport that involves a firearm and all subsequent claims are therefore unnecessary.

But if you did them you need a shotgun. That's all you asked me to prove quit moving the goalposts when your pathetic little argument falls apart.

 

[RF667799]

Firearms are luxuries.
If you really, really, really, really need a gun, then you should not have it.

The remainder of your post is repetitious gibberish.

Weird sort of opinion, but I suppose everyone has that here and there. And even at that, it includes the tacit admission that people need guns.

Everything you've tried to argue seriously has been refuted. You either don't have the ability to determine the needs and values of other people, or you are refusing to demonstrate it.

Is it some strange super power that if you use it, you lose it?

 

[CLAX1911]

Firearms are luxuries.
If you really, really, really, really need a gun, then you should not have it.

Why?

The remainder of your post is repetitious gibberish.

 

[RF667799]

false premise. You do not need to do a sport that involves a firearm and all subsequent claims are therefore unnecessary.

How is it that all the wild claims you make are necessary?

And of course, the whole idea of demanding people "justify" their needs, is that you may subsequently marginalize and demean those needs.

Except that would also be an admission of the existence of those needs.

You picked a real, first rate loser of an argument to clutch to your bosom.

 

[JMB1911A1]

false premise. You do not need to do a sport that involves a firearm and all subsequent claims are therefore unnecessary.

Why do you think you get to determine what activities others find enjoyable? Your arrogance is off the chart.

 

[RF667799]

Why do you think you get to determine what activities others find enjoyable? Your arrogance is off the chart.

Arrogance is part and parcel of an illusion that one is omniscient.

 

[rahl]

EGG ZACK LEE!!!


And semiautomatic weapons won't actually be "banned" either.

They won’t be restricted in any way. The Supreme Court has already told you that.

 

[Rich2018]

EGG ZACK LEE!!!


And semiautomatic weapons won't actually be "banned" either.

Though they should be.

 

[Lursa]

How is it that all the wild claims you make are necessary?

And of course, the whole idea of demanding people "justify" their needs, is that you may subsequently marginalize and demean those needs.

Except that would also be an admission of the existence of those needs.

You picked a real, first rate loser of an argument to clutch to your bosom.

Who says people need to feel safe?

Some are so far from reality it's not possible for them...so, for example, we should all have to suffer the consequences of trying to appease paranoid schizophrenics? Of course not...it's an irrational minority.

 

[CLAX1911]

Though they should be.

Instead of platitudes make an argument. Convince people.

 

[Rich2018]

Instead of platitudes make an argument. Convince people.

How might you be convinced ?

 

[CLAX1911]

How might you be convinced ?

Fair question. Show me that the 3 million instances a year of guns being used to defend people don't happen.

 

[Rich2018]

Fair question. Show me that the 3 million instances a year of guns being used to defend people don't happen.

The UK - doesn't have 3 million (or a similar per capita number) instances of defensive firearms use

I wonder why ???

 

[CLAX1911]

The UK - doesn't have 3 million (or a similar per capita number) instances of defensive firearms use

I wonder why ???

So instead of making an argument you pull up what aboutism.

It's a good thing every single one of you is absolutely terrible at this.

 

[RF667799]

The UK - doesn't have 3 million (or a similar per capita number) instances of defensive firearms use

I wonder why ???

Because the lords, kings, and queens have largely ignored the benefits of firearm ownership as might be experienced by those considered inferior, and only considered their own self interest.

There are some fine firearms made in the UK, and they are readily available to those of considerable means. Ever wonder about that?

 

[Rich2018]

So instead of making an argument you pull up what aboutism.

It's a good thing every single one of you is absolutely terrible at this.

What is your comment about "Defensive Gun Use" is not "what-about-ism" ?

But you also seek to deflect by conveniently ignoring that the UK does have much "Defensive Gun Use"
And again, I wonder why ???

 

[Spock]

Why do you think you get to determine what activities others find enjoyable? Your arrogance is off the chart.

The problem is that the activities you find enjoyable involve firearms and the current American policies on firearms have resulted in 100,000+ deaths and injuries. Surely you do not want that situation to continue.

 

[RF667799]

The problem is that the activities you find enjoyable involve firearms and the current American policies on firearms have resulted in 100,000+ deaths and injuries. Surely you do not want that situation to continue.

There doesn't seem to be a connection offered supporting the causality you imply.

 

[Spock]

Weird sort of opinion, but I suppose everyone has that here and there. And even at that, it includes the tacit admission that people need guns.

Everything you've tried to argue seriously has been refuted. You either don't have the ability to determine the needs and values of other people, or you are refusing to demonstrate it.

Is it some strange super power that if you use it, you lose it?

My evaluation stands until someone can convincingly demonstrate that there is a "need" for firearms.
I am reading confusion about "want" vs "need" in all the posts on that topic.