- Joined
- Dec 12, 2016
- Messages
- 44,373
- Reaction score
- 20,733
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
And even if they were…?? they are NOT against the second amend.
Stop spreading misinfo.........
And even if they were…?? they are NOT against the second amend.
Stop spreading misinfo.........
There isn't, but that's not the point.By what wording of the 1st Amendment is there a qualifier where the government can tell certain groups that they cannot exist?
No. I think their stupidity should be on full display for the world to see. They promote themselves as “gun safety” organization but don’t teach any gun safety at all. All they do is screech for gun control.So do you concur with the OP that mothers who are anti-gun should be stripped of their 1st Amendment rights?
Not just mothers but all women.So do you concur with the OP that mothers who are anti-gun
Not stripped of their 1st Amendment rights, except they shouldn't have a voice in the gun debate if they're against guns, that's all.should be stripped of their 1st Amendment rights?
No.You are joking, right?
Bullshit. They want the 2A destroyed. They work at the beck and call of Lord Michael Bloomberg?? they are NOT against the second amend.
Stop spreading misinfo.........
Well some people say men who are against abortion shouldn't have a voice on that issue.Why?
Then it follows that if you’re against people who are against guns, then you shouldn’t have a voice in the mothers against guns debate. Therefore please consider your voice removed from circulation so far as this topic is concerned.Not just mothers but all women.
Not stripped of their 1st Amendment rights, except they shouldn't have a voice in the gun debate if they're against guns, that's all.
There isn't, but that's not the point.
Arguments based on a ridiculous premise end up failing badly. Good job if that was the intention.The organization Moms Demand Action which is an anti 2A anti gun rights organization should not exist. A mom is a female parent so with a name such as Moms Demand Action it implies that it is an organization run by women and as I said before, women have no business being against gun rights and being anti 2A and those that are should have no voice in that particular matter. So Moms Demand Action has no business even being in existence.
If yiu hate our constitutional why don't you move to a country that suits you better?The organization Moms Demand Action which is an anti 2A anti gun rights organization should not exist. A mom is a female parent so with a name such as Moms Demand Action it implies that it is an organization run by women and as I said before, women have no business being against gun rights and being anti 2A and those that are should have no voice in that particular matter. So Moms Demand Action has no business even being in existence.
They exist, have the right to vote, free speech protections, and the right of assembly like other citizens do. It's why the OP's premise is rubbish.Too bad. They exist.
So people who oppose guns should not have a voice in the debate, but presumably people who support guns should. Should be easy to declare a winner in that contest.Not just mothers but all women.
Not stripped of their 1st Amendment rights, except they shouldn't have a voice in the gun debate if they're against guns, that's all.
The organization Moms Demand Action which is an anti 2A anti gun rights organization should not exist. A mom is a female parent so with a name such as Moms Demand Action it implies that it is an organization run by women and as I said before, women have no business being against gun rights and being anti 2A and those that are should have no voice in that particular matter. So Moms Demand Action has no business even being in existence.
True. And “Sandy Hook Promise” should have nothing to say either. They survived. What’s their beef?The organization Moms Demand Action which is an anti 2A anti gun rights organization should not exist. A mom is a female parent so with a name such as Moms Demand Action it implies that it is an organization run by women and as I said before, women have no business being against gun rights and being anti 2A and those that are should have no voice in that particular matter. So Moms Demand Action has no business even being in existence.
True. And “Sandy Hook Promise” should have nothing to say either. They survived. What’s their beef?
Of course they do. And they can even have the NRA as their advocates. My point was simply to contest the absurd assertion that the moms group should not exist.The Gun Control Industry has every right to exist and participate as an enterprise in the market.
Of course they do. And they can even have the NRA as their advocates. My point was simply to contest the absurd assertion that the moms group should not exist.
lol, wutThe organization Moms Demand Action which is an anti 2A anti gun rights organization should not exist. A mom is a female parent so with a name such as Moms Demand Action it implies that it is an organization run by women and as I said before, women have no business being against gun rights and being anti 2A and those that are should have no voice in that particular matter. So Moms Demand Action has no business even being in existence.
Yes.We agree that is absurd.
Yes.
Gun-grabbers are citizens, too. They can get together and waste their time like anyone else can.
Have you demeaned women your entire life, or are you just braver now that our PE hates women?The organization Moms Demand Action which is an anti 2A anti gun rights organization should not exist. A mom is a female parent so with a name such as Moms Demand Action it implies that it is an organization run by women and as I said before, women have no business being against gun rights and being anti 2A and those that are should have no voice in that particular matter. So Moms Demand Action has no business even being in existence.