- Joined
- Dec 14, 2005
- Messages
- 1,704
- Reaction score
- 10
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Since George Bush is our Commander-in-Chief shouldn't he be considered a recipient for the MOH (Medal of Honor) for having the foresight and military acumen/courage to take on this modern day guerrilla/terrorist/suicidal warfare we see today? Bill Clinton's passive and downright evasive strategies toward terrorism helped pave the way for Bush to become our modern day military hero.
I was kind of torn between offering the MOH and the Nobel Peace Prize to Bush. No one can deny that Bush's spread of democracy throughout the Mideast he!!-hole is more than worthy of any type of available Peace Prize. So you can see the dilemma here. Don't dismay, I'll have an option where you could choose 'both'.
Foresight? :rofl: Yeah sure kid... because this is not only going as planned, but going as foreseen :roll:
Honestly, that day that we were greeted as liberators, and handed roses, was awesome!
Since George Bush is our Commander-in-Chief shouldn't he be considered a recipient for the MOH (Medal of Honor) for having the foresight and military acumen/courage to take on this modern day guerrilla/terrorist/suicidal warfare we see today? Bill Clinton's passive and downright evasive strategies toward terrorism helped pave the way for Bush to become our modern day military hero.
I was kind of torn between offering the MOH and the Nobel Peace Prize to Bush. No one can deny that Bush's spread of democracy throughout the Mideast he!!-hole is more than worthy of any type of available Peace Prize. So you can see the dilemma here. Don't dismay, I'll have an option where you could choose 'both'.
Since George Bush is our Commander-in-Chief shouldn't he be considered a recipient for the MOH (Medal of Honor) for having the foresight and military acumen/courage to take on this modern day guerrilla/terrorist/suicidal warfare we see today? Bill Clinton's passive and downright evasive strategies toward terrorism helped pave the way for Bush to become our modern day military hero.
I was kind of torn between offering the MOH and the Nobel Peace Prize to Bush. No one can deny that Bush's spread of democracy throughout the Mideast he!!-hole is more than worthy of any type of available Peace Prize. So you can see the dilemma here. Don't dismay, I'll have an option where you could choose 'both'.
OK, you had me going for a while...but now I'm 100% convinced that you aren't a real person. You're just a troll. My guess is that you're a liberal trying to parody the worst aspects of conservatism. The problem is, none of the conservatives (at least the intelligent ones) on this forum ever agree with you.
No, I really do think he is just that stupid.
***Your type have been calling Bush stupid since 2000 when he handed Algore and the Democrats a big defeat. Though you're not happy until you see America go down in defeat (ala, Vietnam)--sorry to say you won't get to feel that giddy this time.
Democracies are already spreading like wildfire throughout the Mideast
. Bush is about ready to clamp down on Iran. You did manage to get a chuckle out of me with that 'Slightly Conservative' wording under your avatar. That were a goodin...LOL
Bush and Blair have actually been nominated for the Peace Nobel Price in 2002 for for fighting terrorism and promoting world peace.
BBC News | EUROPE | Nobel nomination for Bush and Blair
Let's look at is the way it is, if Henry Kissinger can get a Peace Nobel Price, there is no limit downwards anymore.
He was a advocator of bombings there before and there are hints his coworkers even made plans about using nuclear weapons against Vietnam. This alone qualifies him to spend the rest of his useless life in a cage, but he did not stop to plan crimes later.Not sure what you mean here, Volker. Kissinger won it for helping to establish the ceasefire and US withdrawl from Vietnam, effectively ending US involvement in the war. I would think this would qualify him for this award.
He was a advocator of bombings there before and there are hints his coworkers even made plans about using nuclear weapons against Vietnam. This alone qualifies him to spend the rest of his useless life in a cage, but he did not stop to plan crimes later.
Even Begin got one.Well, I guess if Arafat can win it then anyone, regardless of how much violence one is associated with, can. :roll:
Even Begin got one.
Hitler was nominated for the Peace Nobel Price in 1939, no joke.So did Sadat.
Hitler was nominated for the Peace Nobel Price in 1939.
I think all Nobel prices are political. The Nobel price does not say much more about a person then he or she has a lobby or good connections.I think we are coming to the conclusion that the Nobel Peace Prize, with, perhaps some notable exceptions, can be misguided, politically motivated, or myopic. Especially, myopic. What do you say, Volker?
I think all Nobel prices are political. The Nobel price does not say much more about a person then he or she has a lobby or good connections.
Another thing about the Peace Nobel Price is that it is named after a guy who made most of his money by selling ammunition.
Yes, his dad was one of the inventors of the mine, he developed the business then and the Nobel company is still one of the big European ammunition manufacturers.Hmmm. not only did he own a major armaments manufactuer, but he invented dynamite. Interesting.
Yes, this is a great idea. We would be the first ones to get it for internet activities, this gives the old price a modern touch and we are much less controversial than many of the others.Hey, we just turned a patisan, rubbishy thread into one providing some good, pertinent information. Perhaps the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize should go to CaptainCourtesy and Volker. :2razz:
Yes, this is a great idea. We would be the first ones to get it for internet activities, this gives the old price a modern touch and we are much less controversial than many of the others.
We would be best quality for it :mrgreen:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?