MOH or Nobel Peace Prize for Bush?

[CaptainCourtesy]

We just have to manage to not start arguing about who gets which share of the donation when all the people are still around.

That's an easy one...remember I said CaptainCourtesy and Volker...see who's first? :2razz:

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

Since George Bush is our Commander-in-Chief shouldn't he be considered a recipient for the MOH (Medal of Honor) for having the foresight and military acumen/courage to take on this modern day guerrilla/terrorist/suicidal warfare we see today? Bill Clinton's passive and downright evasive strategies toward terrorism helped pave the way for Bush to become our modern day military hero.

I was kind of torn between offering the MOH and the Nobel Peace Prize to Bush. No one can deny that Bush's spread of democracy throughout the Mideast he!!-hole is more than worthy of any type of available Peace Prize. So you can see the dilemma here. Don't dismay, I'll have an option where you could choose 'both'.

He should be hanged as a modern Hitler, maybe burnt alive a little first, the tortured and then hanged. Perhaps the best thing would be to combine all the suffering of his victims on him before we hang him..

 

[The Mark]

He should be hanged as a modern Hitler, maybe burnt alive a little first, the tortured and then hanged. Perhaps the best thing would be to combine all the suffering of his victims on him before we hang him..

Who are you referring to?

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

Who are you referring to?

Isnt this thread about Bush?

 

[ptsdkid]

Though it looks like both Volker and Capt Courtesy agree with me that Bush deserves at least the Nobel Peace Prize, I'm a little surprised that more people haven't suggested he claim the MOH.
One thing for sure; a quick glance at the poll shows overwhelming support for Bush to receive both awards. My message has hit home.

 

[Hatuey]

Though it looks like both Volker and Capt Courtesy agree with me that Bush deserves at least the Nobel Peace Prize, I'm a little surprised that more people haven't suggested he claim the MOH.
One thing for sure; a quick glance at the poll shows overwhelming support for Bush to receive both awards. My message has hit home.

For some reason I doubt the captain agrees with you on that Nobel Peace Prize thing for Bush. You dont get a peace prize for starting 2 wars.

BTW. The Medal of Honor is only given to members of the U.S. armed forces that have distinguished themselves. Keyword here being "distinguished". I doubt Bush's military record deserves a MOH.

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

Though it looks like both Volker and Capt Courtesy agree with me that Bush deserves at least the Nobel Peace Prize, I'm a little surprised that more people haven't suggested he claim the MOH.
One thing for sure; a quick glance at the poll shows overwhelming support for Bush to receive both awards. My message has hit home.

I would be happy to award him the silver bullet, I would happily deliver it by means of weapon.

 

[Hatuey]

I would be happy to award him the silver bullet, I would happily deliver it by means of weapon.

You're funny. Why would you want to kill a guy you've never met? You dont personally know the president. Nobody here does. For all you know under different circumstances you and him could have been best buddies. Or even family members. I'm sure you dont wish death on somebody you've never met.

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

You're funny. Why would you want to kill a guy you've never met? You dont personally know the president. Nobody here does. For all you know under different circumstances you and him could have been best buddies. Or even family members. I'm sure you dont wish death on somebody you've never met.

I didnt say that, I just said I would be happy to award a silver bullet to him as reward by the means of a weapon. :roll:

 

[Volker]

That's an easy one...remember I said CaptainCourtesy and Volker...see who's first? :2razz:

Oh, I knew, you would try something like this, it's still about this Grammy from the seventies, right? But hey, remember, I was the one who told the original songwriter, that this song is not good and if we give him $100 for it, it's more because we like his enthusiasm for music. I was the one who hired the people who actually sang this song and played the instruments. All you did was to create the show and negotiate with the record company. And really, your lip synchronity was not good, I was afraid the whole time, they go check and find this play back equipment, you know?

This is my Grammy :mrgreen:

 

[Volker]

Though it looks like both Volker and Capt Courtesy agree with me that Bush deserves at least the Nobel Peace Prize, I'm a little surprised that more people haven't suggested he claim the MOH.
One thing for sure; a quick glance at the poll shows overwhelming support for Bush to receive both awards. My message has hit home.

Yes, the Medal of Honor is an American award, I did not want to interfere with it :mrgreen:

 

[Volker]

For all you know under different circumstances you and him could have been best buddies. Or even family members.

Maybe one of the Bush twins falls in love with Maximus and vice versa :mrgreen:

 

[Hatuey]

Maybe one of the Bush twins falls in love with Maximus and vice versa :mrgreen:

I can see the wedding. George Jr. walking little...w/e her name is down the isle....Maximus looking like a player in his black and blue Armani tux(thats the kind I wore so not one word my impecable taste in clothing). As his bride walks down her father hands her over to Maximus and gently whispers "Either your with us...or you're with the terrorists". Now thats a movie I'd pay to see.

 

[Volker]

I can see the wedding. George Jr. walking little...w/e her name is down the isle....Maximus looking like a player in his black and blue Armani tux(thats the kind I wore so not one word my impecable taste in clothing). As his bride walks down her father hands her over to Maximus and gently whispers "Either your with us...or you're with the terrorists". Now thats a movie I'd pay to see.

It reminds of this Steve Martin Father of the Bride movie, there the wedding planner said something like "this suit is not black, it's night blue" and Steve Martin said "Armani does not make nightblue suits" and the wedding planner says "yes, I know" :mrgreen:

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

Maybe one of the Bush twins falls in love with Maximus and vice versa :mrgreen:

Wow, maybe thats a good idea, then I would kill Bush with words, he would have no chance of explaining his stupidity, nor have any chance at "winning" the debate.
I would nag to him more than a woman nags her husband.

"hey daddy, where was the WMDs again?"
"Ahh, Saddam was the one in the WTC plane, right..:doh "
"Dad, didn you say you went to Iraq because they had WMDs?"
"Aha, you changed your mind then? Eh.."
"Dad, how does it feel to have 100ds of thousands of innocent peoples death by your work?"

Then he would tell me stories like.

"Son, it feeaals gooed, I never kneeaw any of thoese peoploes"

Then I say "did Iran really follow the nucilair preloferatiol treaty?"

 

[Volker]

Wow, maybe thats a good idea, then I would kill Bush with words, he would have no chance of explaining his stupidity, nor have any chance at "winning" the debate.
I would nag to him more than a woman nags her husband.

"hey daddy, where was the WMDs again?"
"Ahh, Saddam was the one in the WTC plane, right..:doh "
"Dad, didn you say you went to Iraq because they had WMDs?"
"Aha, you changed your mind then? Eh.."
"Dad, how does it feel to have 100ds of thousands of innocent peoples death by your work?"

Then he would tell me stories like.

"Son, it feeaals gooed, I never kneeaw any of thoese peoploes"

Then I say "did Iran really follow the nucilair preloferatiol treaty?"

No, you would be in love, you would wear your best shirt when she introduces you to mom and dad.

George would ask you if you like Halma and you would tell him, this is your favorite game. You would let him win almost every time, drink coffee and tell Laura, that you have never tasted such an excellent cake.

You would be in love :mrgreen:

 

[Red_Dave]

Since George Bush is our Commander-in-Chief shouldn't he be considered a recipient for the MOH (Medal of Honor) for having the foresight and military acumen/courage to take on this modern day guerrilla/terrorist/suicidal warfare we see today? Bill Clinton's passive and downright evasive strategies toward terrorism helped pave the way for Bush to become our modern day military hero.

I was kind of torn between offering the MOH and the Nobel Peace Prize to Bush. No one can deny that Bush's spread of democracy throughout the Mideast he!!-hole is more than worthy of any type of available Peace Prize. So you can see the dilemma here. Don't dismay, I'll have an option where you could choose 'both'.

I think the problem here lies in the term "peace prize" given the fact bush has made the world a dramatically more unstable place. The invasion has turned the world against america, inspired a greater hatred of the west which is proven to have worsend the terroist threat, and given the iran the means to hit back at the west. It would be obsurd to give bush a peace prize when he has jeapodised the chance of a peaceful world for generations to come.

 

[ptsdkid]

I think the problem here lies in the term "peace prize" given the fact bush has made the world a dramatically more unstable place. The invasion has turned the world against america, inspired a greater hatred of the west which is proven to have worsend the terroist threat, and given the iran the means to hit back at the west. It would be obsurd to give bush a peace prize when he has jeapodised the chance of a peaceful world for generations to come.

***How has Bush made the world dramatically more unstable? These modern day Crusades of pitting radical Islamists against the entire infidel world--came to a peak in the 1990's when Clinton decided not to confront their advances. The 9/11 suicide bombers were already embedded inside the United States in the 1990's as they took flying lessons under Bill Clinton's condoning watch.

It was Bush that decided to take the fight to these radicals on their own land. Do you think the majority people of Iraq would be living a better standard of living under the leadership of Saddam, or by having the right and freedom to vote for a Democratic government, as they do now? Your premise that there was some sort of world peace before Bush took the initiative to fight against radical jihadists--is simply absurd. Bush deserves the MOH for taking it to our enemy, and by doing it despite the want of liberal Americans to lose the war, or to avoid the threat by burying our collective heads inside an ant hill. The Nobel Peace Prize should also come into play here. Those Iraqi people have a much better chance at seeing 'peace' now--then they did when Saddam was slaughtering them and disposing their bodies in massive unmarked graves. Look, no one is stopping you from voting for 'both' in the poll. You can do it on the Q-T--know one will know that it was you coming to your senses.

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

***How has Bush made the world dramatically more unstable? These modern day Crusades of pitting radical Islamists against the entire infidel world--came to a peak in the 1990's when Clinton decided not to confront their advances. The 9/11 suicide bombers were already embedded inside the United States in the 1990's as they took flying lessons under Bill Clinton's condoning watch.

It was Bush that decided to take the fight to these radicals on their own land. Do you think the majority people of Iraq would be living a better standard of living under the leadership of Saddam, or by having the right and freedom to vote for a Democratic government, as they do now? Your premise that there was some sort of world peace before Bush took the initiative to fight against radical jihadists--is simply absurd. Bush deserves the MOH for taking it to our enemy, and by doing it despite the want of liberal Americans to lose the war, or to avoid the threat by burying our collective heads inside an ant hill. The Nobel Peace Prize should also come into play here. Those Iraqi people have a much better chance at seeing 'peace' now--then they did when Saddam was slaughtering them and disposing their bodies in massive unmarked graves. Look, no one is stopping you from voting for 'both' in the poll. You can do it on the Q-T--know one will know that it was you coming to your senses.

Actually, the living standards are far worse looking away from the fact that when you walk on the streets there is a good chance you will get killed and the war massacre going on..

 

[WI Crippler]

I have to agree with a previous poster here. I think Ptsdkid gives conservatives a bad name, and I think he may be doing it on purpose. His stances are overtly meant to troll. Please, to all our liberal or european posters, I beg that when you think of conservative americans, do not let Ptsdkid be the flag bearer in your mind.

 

[Red_Dave]

***How has Bush made the world dramatically more unstable? These modern day Crusades of pitting radical Islamists against the entire infidel world--came to a peak in the 1990's when Clinton decided not to confront their advances. The 9/11 suicide bombers were already embedded inside the United States in the 1990's as they took flying lessons under Bill Clinton's condoning watch.

It was Bush that decided to take the fight to these radicals on their own land. Do you think the majority people of Iraq would be living a better standard of living under the leadership of Saddam, or by having the right and freedom to vote for a Democratic government, as they do now? Your premise that there was some sort of world peace before Bush took the initiative to fight against radical jihadists--is simply absurd. Bush deserves the MOH for taking it to our enemy, and by doing it despite the want of liberal Americans to lose the war, or to avoid the threat by burying our collective heads inside an ant hill. The Nobel Peace Prize should also come into play here. Those Iraqi people have a much better chance at seeing 'peace' now--then they did when Saddam was slaughtering them and disposing their bodies in massive unmarked graves. Look, no one is stopping you from voting for 'both' in the poll. You can do it on the Q-T--know one will know that it was you coming to your senses.

How has bush made the world more unstable? for the reasons i listed:roll: Heres two errors from your post

1 The 9/11 hijackers where Saudi not Iraqi
2 Saddam was americas ally untill he became inconvient.

 

[Doremus Jessup]

Where is the option for a swift kick in his F&ckin' baby-nuts?

Kid might just be a troll. Either that or he is full on f%ckin' crazy and needs to be institutionalized.

PS: I don't think that they award the MOH for destroying the Constitution, but maybe when Hillary gets "elected." :shock: :2wave:

 

[americanwoman]

I would nag to him more than a woman nags her husband.

you, my dear friend, are taking on the impossible :mrgreen:

 

[americanwoman]

d) none of the above

 

[Hatuey]

I think the problem here lies in the term "peace prize" given the fact bush has made the world a dramatically more unstable place. The invasion has turned the world against america, inspired a greater hatred of the west which is proven to have worsend the terroist threat, and given the iran the means to hit back at the west. It would be obsurd to give bush a peace prize when he has jeapodised the chance of a peaceful world for generations to come.

Bush didn't make the world more unstable. The policies, double standards and overall shakyness of his administration did. It took an entire team of people to orquestrate this war. There's no way Bush did this all on his own so giving him that much credit is just not using logic.