MOH or Nobel Peace Prize for Bush?

[Flea]

Originally Posted by Maximus Zeebra
Its really annoying to hear that, especially considering its YOU who have problem to understand any other viewpoint than your own extreme right wing stuff.

It is annoying to hear that? Why, becuase you find it impossible to find disagreements from a person that falls within similar social and political lines? Perhaps you are more to the right of center than you believe?

I love hearing the other guys view. Like you and Volker here. I read every post and I won't comment on any of them really, since I am learning from YOU guys. See how that works? I don't offer two bit opinions about stuff that I don't understand fully. I listen like a fly on the wall and I learn.

You just don't like me because I shove your inconsistancies back at you. I will do my best to give you a "language free pass" from now on though, this could be making a bigger problem than I realize. Who knows? You debate better in English than I would in Spanish or French, and waaaay better than I could in Portugese.

Extreme Right? C'mon, stop being ridiculous.

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

It is annoying to hear that? Why, becuase you find it impossible to find disagreements from a person that falls within similar social and political lines? Perhaps you are more to the right of center than you believe?

I love hearing the other guys view. Like you and Volker here. I read every post and I won't comment on any of them really, since I am learning from YOU guys. See how that works? I don't offer two bit opinions about stuff that I don't understand fully. I listen like a fly on the wall and I learn.

You just don't like me because I shove your inconsistancies back at you. I will do my best to give you a "language free pass" from now on though, this could be making a bigger problem than I realize. Who knows? You debate better in English than I would in Spanish or French, and waaaay better than I could in Portugese.

Extreme Right? C'mon, stop being ridiculous.

Ok, well not extreme right, I actually never saw any of your opinions except personal attacks. And since that is so popular with the people branded conservatives on this forum I just assumed.
And yes, its because of the inconstancies. <-- this is how its spelled by the way. :roll:

I never said I was leftist really, just that I am extremely liberal.

 

[Flea]

Originally Posted by Maximus Zeebra
Ok, well not extreme right, I actually never saw any of your opinions except personal attacks. And since that is so popular with the people branded conservatives on this forum I just assumed.
And yes, its because of the inconstancies. <-- this is how its spelled by the way.

I never said I was leftist really, just that I am extremely liberal.

So you made massive "Assumptions" based off of Zero Valid Information? Sounds good. :doh

That is NOT how it is spelled buddy. "inconstancies" Is NOT the word I was trying to communicate. I mispelled the word "inconsistancies" by one letter since I was typing fast. In another thread just now I mispelled "not" with "no" but that is just how it goes when we type fast and for you to be a nit-picky whiner about a word that you are WRONG about anyway is childish.

See, check this out. "inconstancies. <-- this is how its spelled by the way. " You mis-spelled "its" there should be an apostrophe between the "t" and the "s" since the word is a Contraction. Get it? Dumb huh? If you are gonna dish it out you had better be perfect kiddo, or else you look like an Fool.

Are you going to grow up now or not?

I never said that you said that you were Leftist anyway. I am just saying that you misjudged me and that perhaps you should re-assess how you assess people and yourself.

It seems that you missed most of what I was saying anyway. You addressed the negative points instead of the postive/forward thinking ones again. Hey, maybe I am not the one caught up in the hate, maybe it is you. Just relax.

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

So you made massive "Assumptions" based off of Zero Valid Information? Sounds good. :doh

That is NOT how it is spelled buddy. "inconstancies" Is NOT the word I was trying to communicate. I mispelled the word "inconsistancies" by one letter since I was typing fast. In another thread just now I mispelled "not" with "no" but that is just how it goes when we type fast and for you to be a nit-picky whiner about a word that you are WRONG about anyway is childish.

But that is what you always do when you debate, pick on spelling and unimportant stuff. I was just demonstrating a point. I don't like that.

See, check this out. "inconstancies. <-- this is how its spelled by the way. " You mis-spelled "its" there should be an apostrophe between the "t" and the "s" since the word is a Contraction. Get it? Dumb huh? If you are gonna dish it out you had better be perfect kiddo, or else you look like an Fool.

You see, then you get all angry and start calling names, you cannot really debate can you? You are just here to point out spelling mistakes and call people names when you don't even know them.

Are you going to grow up now or not?

...and again.

For all you know I am 52, and for all I know you are 13.

I never said that you said that you were Leftist anyway. I am just saying that you misjudged me and that perhaps you should re-assess how you assess people and yourself.

With all these "claims" of my personality and how adult I a, and all the name calling, maybe you are the one who should re-assess how you assess people AND yourself.

It seems that you missed most of what I was saying anyway. You addressed the negative points instead of the postive/forward thinking ones again. Hey, maybe I am not the one caught up in the hate, maybe it is you. Just relax.

Maybe, maybe not. Who knows? Not you it seems..

You will always call me and other people names on this forum while not really getting your point out there, so I don't REALLY see a reason I should debate with you.

 

[Flea]

Originally Posted by Maximus Zeebra
But that is what you always do when you debate, pick on spelling and unimportant stuff. I was just demonstrating a point. I don't like that.

OK

You see, then you get all angry and start calling names, you cannot really debate can you? You are just here to point out spelling mistakes and call people names when you don't even know them.

Frustrated. I get frustrated with certain people when they seemingly can't understand the point and instead they want to make massive "Assumptions" based off of Zero Valid Information

"I actually never saw any of your opinions except personal attacks. And since that is so popular with the people branded conservatives on this forum I just assumed"

Since it is you, by your own admission, that is not "debating" but rather "Assuming" how do you honestly expect me to debte you in an "assumption fest"? Really, I would like an answer to this question. #1

...and again.

For all you know I am 52, and for all I know you are 13.

And actual age has nothing to do with maturity. Bodi's 3-year old sounds more mature than ptskid, for example.

With all these "claims" of my personality and how adult I a, and all the name calling, maybe you are the one who should re-assess how you assess people AND yourself.

I am not the one making assumptions. I just read what you say. You say that English is you first language and then you say that it is your fourth or fifth language. Yeah, I remember stuff and maybe you mis-spoke, but you do this stuff a lot. You say that you are just right of Centrist? That is what I think then. I dont assume that you are something else just because you make comments like LeftyHenry. I don' call you a communist.

Maybe, maybe not. Who knows? Not you it seems..

Not me for sure, I already said that.

You will always call me and other people names on this forum while not really getting your point out there, so I don't REALLY see a reason I should debate with you.

Incorrect. I never have once called Captain Courtesy, or gunny, or Bodei, or Stace, or Kelzie, or Hateuy, or many many many other people names...ever! You are not the normal one here. :2razz:

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

OK
1. Frustrated. I get frustrated with certain people when they seemingly can't understand the point and instead they want to make massive "Assumptions" based off of Zero Valid Information

"I actually never saw any of your opinions except personal attacks. And since that is so popular with the people branded conservatives on this forum I just assumed"

2. Since it is you, by your own admission, that is not "debating" but rather "Assuming" how do you honestly expect me to debte you in an "assumption fest"? Really, I would like an answer to this question. #1



3. And actual age has nothing to do with maturity. Bodi's 3-year old sounds more mature than ptskid, for example.



4. I am not the one making assumptions. I just read what you say. You say that English is you first language and then you say that it is your fourth or fifth language. Yeah, I remember stuff and maybe you mis-spoke, but you do this stuff a lot. You say that you are just right of Centrist? That is what I think then. I dont assume that you are something else just because you make comments like LeftyHenry. I don' call you a communist.


5. Incorrect. I never have once called Captain Courtesy, or gunny, or Bodei, or Stace, or Kelzie, or Hateuy, or many many many other people names...ever! You are not the normal one here. :2razz:

1. You should be quite frustrated with lots of people on this forum then, especially aqvapubi.

2. I dont assume anything, what I say is facts, opinions bases on facts, theories based on facts, and a few times theories based on conclusions of facts that doesn't directly relate but relate if you see the whole picture.

3. How can you tell over the internet? Are you the internet oracle of peoplejudgement?

4. I never said English was my first language, initially I said fouRT. Not first, even though they can look alike if you have the right glasses on. I reconsidered this, because it could actually be my fifth language, depending if I put French before it or after.

5. Good for you, maybe you should start debating factually instead of namecallingly with people you DON'T agree with also? :2wave:

 

[Flea]

Originally Posted by Maximus Zeebra
1. You should be quite frustrated with lots of people on this forum then, especially aqvapubi.

I don't ever talk to that guy.

2. I dont assume anything, what I say is facts, opinions bases on facts, theories based on facts, and a few times theories based on conclusions of facts that doesn't directly relate but relate if you see the whole picture.

- Maximus Zeebra - "Ok, well not extreme right, I actually never saw any of your opinions except personal attacks. And since that is so popular with the people branded conservatives on this forum I just assumed."

Want to try that again? You talk about me not being able to follow you? :rofl
You can't even follow yourself. How will you justify this one, I wonder?

3. How can you tell over the internet? Are you the internet oracle of peoplejudgement?

I can't. That is why I said, "Bodi's 3-year old sounds more mature than ptskid, for example."

"Sounds" - A mental impression. Not a fact. An Impression.

4. I never said English was my first language, initially I said fouRT. Not first, even though they can look alike if you have the right glasses on. I reconsidered this, because it could actually be my fifth language, depending if I put French before it or after.

You are right. You never said it was your "first" language.
What you did say was that it was your "primary" language.
That indicates the same thing.

You later attempted to clarify, and that is just fine and dandy, but initially, you said that English was your primary language and that is something that Both Bodi and I nailed you on and you ignored. That is fine. Ignore again instead of just saying that you mis-spoke or whatever. That is what you do and it is easy to pick apart and it is frustrating to then have it ignored.

5. Good for you, maybe you should start debating factually instead of namecallingly with people you DON'T agree with also?

Perhaps we could both learn a lesson there.

 

[bub]

OK, you had me going for a while...but now I'm 100% convinced that you aren't a real person. You're just a troll. My guess is that you're a liberal trying to parody the worst aspects of conservatism. The problem is, none of the conservatives (at least the intelligent ones) on this forum ever agree with you.

I also think it. He looks like the guys on the landover Baptist forums.

 

[CurrentAffairs]

So you made massive "Assumptions" based off of Zero Valid Information? Sounds good. :doh

That is NOT how it is spelled buddy. "inconstancies" Is NOT the word I was trying to communicate. I mispelled the word "inconsistancies" by one letter since I was typing fast. In another thread just now I mispelled "not" with "no" but that is just how it goes when we type fast and for you to be a nit-picky whiner about a word that you are WRONG about anyway is childish.

See, check this out. "inconstancies. <-- this is how its spelled by the way. " You mis-spelled "its" there should be an apostrophe between the "t" and the "s" since the word is a Contraction. Get it? Dumb huh? If you are gonna dish it out you had better be perfect kiddo, or else you look like an Fool.

Are you going to grow up now or not?

I never said that you said that you were Leftist anyway. I am just saying that you misjudged me and that perhaps you should re-assess how you assess people and yourself.

It seems that you missed most of what I was saying anyway. You addressed the negative points instead of the postive/forward thinking ones again. Hey, maybe I am not the one caught up in the hate, maybe it is you. Just relax.

Come on, girls. You're both pretty.

 

[Flea]

Originally Posted by CurrentAffairs
Come on, girls. You're both pretty.

Why...Thank you!

 

[Real Korimyr #9]

Moderator's Warning:

This will stop now.

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

***Do you think it possible that you fine gentlemen start shifting the failed European liberal/socialist politics back to giving the Conservative George Bush the deserved accolades and consideration for the MOH and the Nobel Peace Prize? Isn't that part of your job, Capt Courtesy?

Actually, part of my job is to rescue rubbishy threads from meandering into pointlessness...which I, with the help of others, have done.

 

[ptsdkid]

Actually, part of my job is to rescue rubbishy threads from meandering into pointlessness...which I, with the help of others, have done.

***It only started to get rubbishy when you entered the fray.

 

[BodiSatva]

Originally Posted by Maximus Zeebra
2. I dont assume anything, what I say is facts, opinions bases on facts, theories based on facts, and a few times theories based on conclusions of facts that doesn't directly relate but relate if you see the whole picture.

Originally Posted by Maximus Zeebra
Ok, well not extreme right, I actually never saw any of your opinions except personal attacks. And since that is so popular with the people branded conservatives on this forum I just assumed.

This PERFECTLY illustrates what my major point of contention has been with many of those that I end up hounding...

 

[CaptainCourtesy]

***It only started to get rubbishy when you entered the fray.

Actually, I cleaned up the mess you created.

 

[The Mark]

***It only started to get rubbishy when you entered the fray.

Actually, ptsdkid, the initial thread/poll subject was poorly thought out, failing to take into account certain factors such as the fact that President Bush has done nothing in his lifetime to deserve the Medal of Honor. And that, while it can be argued he led us into attacking Iraq as a way to prevent future violence, he was not actually using a non-violent method. Which seems to eliminate him from the running for a Nobel Peace Prize. This is, of course, not mentioning such things like even if he was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, there would be almost no chance of his being actually awarded one.

The entrance of CaptainCourtesy into the conversation, and the following partial subject change to a much more informative, interesting, though-provoking (wow, some people's heads must hurt), and more realistic topic improved the general atmosphere in this thread considerably.

 

[Flea]

Yeah Bodi, I am not sure what can be done about that. Pointing it our for purposes of clarifying results in denial and inevitable mis-understandings and frustration. In essence, a waste of time.

The anger of the denials astounds me. Flat out denial when it is in writing? :lol:

 

[Pull My Finger]

Shouldn't there be a 'neither' option and a 'pink slip' option.

JMO, it would make it a real poll.

Peace