I don't agree with a lot of your 'facts'.
You're a guy with an ax to grind.
Ballistics show that the gun was fired about 20 feet away from Brown. So even if there was a scuffle near the car, that does not justify shooting an unarmed suspect.
So no trial Shrub? just straight to the death penalty right?
If the cop had been violently beaten in the face before the shoot with an attempt to grab his gun, and thought the suspect was returning to continue the aggravated assault, then they may conclude the shoot was justified. A lot of it's going to be scientific DNA evidence, testimonies from eyewitnesses, any actual phone video evidence and Wilson's explanation of events.
The burden is to prove the officer guilty of willfully murdering a suspect without any provocation.
this is what they do.. race hustling for PROFIT... they drum up money with these tragedies.. you do know Sharptons action commity? correct? you do know this correct?
I have no use for either of those characters. But the disinformation that I was referring to would have been from the right.
I have no use for either of those characters. But the disinformation that I was referring to would have been from the right.
sure..... FOX NEWS DID IT!!!!
How can you be so sure?
I have no use for either of those characters. But the disinformation that I was referring to would have been from the right.
I'm not so sure, its an assumption like most people are making on this issue.
Oh yes, it was the " right wing " who perpetuated this " Gentle Giant " Good kid narrative who was "assassinated " as he minded his own business.....
Wait, no it wasn't.
It was hack news sites like CNN that perpetuated that.
Do you automatically assume that disinformation comes from the right?
?So no trial Shrub? just straight to the death penalty right
Of course not. It comes from the right, the left, the White House, the Kremlin, the Likud Party, No. 10 Downing Street. It can come from anywhere, even you!
axe to grind? my axe to grind is the rail roading of a decent cop who did nothing but his job and almost lost his life to a thug..
you view it through skin color...I do not..whats to get?
Whatever you say fella, it's all up to you.
I'm just an innocent by-sitter.
Me, I'm just going to wait and see how any trials turn out.
I did not leave out relevant information. We are arguing about whether or not Brown was shot in the back of the head twice. I have provided 3 separate sources showing this occurred. Why are you unable to refute the evidence?
I did not imply anything, you just immediately jumped to conclusions and started ranting and raving.
Keep spreading your stuff and I'll keep ignoring it.
Whatever you say fella, it's all up to you.
I'm just an innocent by-sitter.
Me, I'm just going to wait and see how any trials turn out.
He was NOT shot from behind.. period.....
Wilson did nothing wrong.. why do we need a trial?.. Wilson did his job, whats to punish?You "assume" there will be a trial...
again.. howd you like Miek Browns lyrics?... him and Trayvon have a lot in common
If the cop had been violently beaten in the face before the shoot with an attempt to grab his gun, and thought the suspect was returning to continue the aggravated assault, then they may conclude the shoot was justified. A lot of it's going to be scientific DNA evidence, testimonies from eyewitnesses, any actual phone video evidence and Wilson's explanation of events.
The burden is to prove the officer guilty of willfully murdering a suspect without any provocation.
It's illegal to "murder" someone with provocation!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?