• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has signed a law that guarantees free breakfast and lunch for EVERY student in the state

Same as California...



Normally my conservative side would ask for means testing however my pragmatic side says that in some areas that might be used to shame the applicants and it's not worth fighting over if it's going to stall the passage of the measure.
That having been said, means testing would end up with a positive side effect, less wasted money feeding kids whose parents can afford to give them lunch money means the funding could go toward more higher quality & nutritious food being made available.
 
Normally my conservative side would ask for means testing however my pragmatic side says that in some areas that might be used to shame the applicants and it's not worth fighting over if it's going to stall the passage of the measure.
That having been said, means testing would end up with a positive side effect, less wasted money feeding kids whose parents can afford to give them lunch money means the funding could go toward more higher quality & nutritious food being made available.
i just read a teacher post that a bunch of kids who eat at home just skip the school breakfasts.
 
i just read a teacher post that a bunch of kids who eat at home just skip the school breakfasts.

I read about that sort of thing all the time too and that's why I am not going to stand on ceremony about whether some kids can afford it, or can't afford it.
If it only makes five percent difference in funds, I'm not going to worry about it.
Sign the bill, feed the rugrats, teach em and send them home safely.
 
There's several things that are great about this. Guaranteeing children are well feed and the other is that this human trusts people to forgo it if they don't need it, instead of treating them like lying scum who'll take advantage of a program they don't need. Bravo!

What a refreshing change.
 
"but who's going to pay for this????"

"It takes a village to raise a child."

Whoever said that was telling the truth. We all must do our part to take care of children, not force parents below the poverty line to give their kids all the money they have left.
 
It was crazy for this to be an issue a century ago when the country was a lot poorer. It's crazier today.
 
brown bag it.. but with inflation parents needing all the help they can get - feed the kids at school
 
Based. Now expand it to everyone in the state.
 
You have this leftist Governor wanting to feed children, while leftist Michelle Obama was starving children. The only thing the two leftists have in common is that they both want uneducated children. Uneducated children make for uneducated voters, which is the only way leftists are able to stay in power.
 
This should be a national initiative.


Some of the states with the highest poverty rates do not require schools participate in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP).

Feed the children, for God's sake. Pay for it by repealing Trump's tax cuts for the rich.
 
Normally my conservative side would ask for means testing however my pragmatic side says that in some areas that might be used to shame the applicants and it's not worth fighting over if it's going to stall the passage of the measure.
That having been said, means testing would end up with a positive side effect, less wasted money feeding kids whose parents can afford to give them lunch money means the funding could go toward more higher quality & nutritious food being made available.
With no means testing the rich people can't complain they're being discriminated against like they're doing with the student loan suff.
 
Get rid of right to work for less nationwide, and then maybe measures like this won't be as necessary.
 
It's kind of strange how the only people who will have any problems with this are the same folks who believe we should strip away rights and rewrite history itself in order to "protect the children".
 
brown bag it.. but with inflation parents needing all the help they can get - feed the kids at school
Depends on what the school is feeding them. Remember the disaster of Michelle Obama's school lunch thing?
 
Depends on what the school is feeding them. Remember the disaster of Michelle Obama's school lunch thing?

Yeah, what a disaster that was.

"The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 was associated with better dietary quality for lunch among low-income, low-middle–income, and middle-high–income students estimated to be participants in the NSLP."

 
Back
Top Bottom