• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mike Johnson Says ICE Shooting a Priest Doesn’t Cross the Line

Imagine choosing a fat NYC conman over your own religion.
 
Please provide evidence the priest obstructed an Ice vehicle or trespassed.
That is not what I said in my followup post. I for a few days now stated they will not tolerate blocking their movement, but also today pointed out they will not tolerate trespass.
 
That is not what I said in my followup post. I for a few days now stated they will not tolerate blocking their movement, but also today pointed out they will not tolerate trespass.

Imagine being a “libertarian” and supporting the government shooting people for stepping on grass.
 
The difference here is there is simply no tolerance being given. You cross the legal limit with ICE and they arrest you. If you resist, you get put down.

No softball here. They are playing hardball. It amazes me the left is so stupid they have not realized this yet.
The priest in question was standing alone and praying. He was fired upon by agents on a rooftop who were not in any danger (because nobody could even reach them) and were not in the process of trying to arrest anyone.
 
Imagine being a “libertarian” and supporting the government shooting people for stepping on grass.
I support them forcefully removing the people blocking their movement. I disagree with just the trespass when still outside the gate.

Telling what the facts are do not mean I support all their actions. I recognize and speak the truth the best I can.

To accuse me of supporting just because I inform you what is happening shows little understanding and hateful bias on your part.
 
I support them forcefully removing the people blocking their movement. I disagree with just the trespass when still outside the gate.

Telling what the facts are do not mean I support all their actions. I recognize and speak the truth the best I can.

To accuse me of supporting just because I inform you what is happening shows little understanding and hateful bias on your part.

Then why didn’t you condemn them rather than just repeating their authoritarian position? Why didn’t you spare even a single word to say their position was wrong?
 
Duh....

My statement was pointing out the stupidity of the news source used. One that requires you to download unknown software. Then possible having other people get infected with the shared link.

But no.... You automatically go into confirmation bias mode....
 
I support them forcefully removing the people blocking their movement. I disagree with just the trespass when still outside the gate.

Telling what the facts are do not mean I support all their actions. I recognize and speak the truth the best I can.

To accuse me of supporting just because I inform you what is happening shows little understanding and hateful bias on your part.
You do support it. You refuse to condemn their actions. You've never condemned a single action by anyone in this corrupt regime. You support all of it. You actively leap to defend absolutely everything.
 
It's no longer a battle between political parties. It's now a battle between people with no morals versus people with morals.



"House Speaker Mike Johnson thinks faith leaders and journalists are fair targets for federal law enforcement officers that have descended on Chicago."




If they engage in violence - they are not immune. Political violence is standard procedure for the left - but it will be met with decisive action.

Further the hate site you link to has no legitimacy.
 
Duh....

My statement was pointing out the stupidity of the news source used. One that requires you to download unknown software. Then possible having other people get infected with the shared link.

But no.... You automatically go into confirmation bias mode....
For future reference, Clarification, by stating "although I believe this is accurate, I dont like sources that require an app to be downloaded"

The way you posted, it was misconstrued as you denying it happened.
 
Last edited:
He's a fake Christian, anyone can see that.

Oh?

Because some rando fascist hate site no one has ever heard of that is behind a paywall claims he said they are fair targets? I don't know if the little Goebbels on the site actually quote Speaker Johnson - but I do know that whatever the quote - it is nothing like the claims of the drones here.

The clown show for the fascist left marches on...
 
Wow. You trust a news source that requires you use their virus filled application?

"SmartNews" is a news aggregator - a portal. It is NOT the source of the story, which is "The New Republic". "SmartNews" also has no known connection that I am aware of with malware. It is clickbait driven, but so is much main stream media these days.
 
You should have lead with that in the OP instead of a site that requires idiots download their spyware to see the news they have.
It’s not my OP.
I did see this after I looked. They are always told to step away, on the sidewalk or the other side of it. they were trespassing on ICE property.
That is assault by the officer. The pastor was standing there with his arms open and was simply talking.
Again, ICE is not tolerating any occupation of their property. Stay off of it or be dealt with. Why are people so retarded they have not learned this yet? ICE is not fooling around, they are serious.
1st amendment. They have a right to protest and to speak. The officer who shot him committed assault
 
I support them forcefully removing the people blocking their movement. I disagree with just the trespass when still outside the gate.
What an idiotic statement.
The priest was standing on a public sidewalk exercising his 1st amendment rights when an ice agent deliberately pepperballed him in the face.
Reality check:
This is assault.

And, no matter how you try and spin this, youll always be wrong as well as morally and ethically deficient.
 
You do support it. You refuse to condemn their actions.
I agree with forceful removal when blocking the path.

I disagree with what happened to the priest, but i understand it. Why should I condemn it? I see the larger picture.
You've never condemned a single action by anyone in this corrupt regime.
I do not consider it corrupt like I do the democrats.
You support all of it. You actively leap to defend absolutely everything.
I understand it and prefer not to allow the leftist lies persist.
 
If they engage in violence - they are not immune. Political violence is standard procedure for the left - but it will be met with decisive action.

Further the hate site you link to has no legitimacy.
I am glad that our government is finally taking steps to stop domestic violence.

Am I suppose to be OK with domestic violence as a libertarian?

I think not.
 
For future reference, Clarification, by stating "although I believe this is accurate, I dont like sources that require an app to be downloaded"

The way you posted, it was misconstrued as you denying it happened.
Do I need to also hold your hand?
 
Back
Top Bottom