guns_God_glory said:Michael is a self serving pig. The uglieness about his films are that he is the editor. He edits out everything he disagrees with leaving you only his side of the story. HMMMM, what is this called? Oh, i know. PROPAGANDA
Soviet_Guy said:I believe that it was Ben Laden's speech 4 days before the election that triggered the winner, remember how tight it was, it all came down to those people thinking: " Well, I hate Bush, but Ben Laden supports Kerry, and Laden commanded the bombing of the World Trade Centres in 2001, hmm, so if Laden supports Kerry and Laden contributed to 9/11 then Kerry must be one of those people who supports the events of 9/11, so hmmm, I could always vote for Nader, wait...he's not on the ballot, okay, I'll vote Bush. "
And there you have it ladies and gentlemen!
guns_God_glory said:Michael is a self serving pig. The uglieness about his films are that he is the editor. He edits out everything he disagrees with leaving you only his side of the story. HMMMM, what is this called? Oh, i know. PROPAGANDA
There is no terrorist threat. There is no terrorist threat. Yes, there have been horrific acts, of terrorism and yes there will be horrific acts again. But that does not mean that there’s some massive terrorist threat.” - Said by Michael Moore at The Power Center in Michigan during the book release for “Dude, Where’s My Country?
How is film footage of interviews of GI's in Iraq a farce. You hear it from there own words. Where's the farce. Watching Bush do nothing as planes were slamming into the Trade Centers is not a farce. That's what he was doing at that moment. Oh, my mistake, he was doing something, reading a book to 1st graders.Farce is funny due to the closeness of the subject matter to the perception of reality, but draws more on stereotypes than actual facts - facts are rarely funny.
I can accept you don't like Moore if that's the way you feel. But be careful using labels as the only evidence for authenticity. Because by your definition, I can make the same case for Bush hyping up the Sadaam threat to justify war. That's propaganda too.but I can't respect a propagandist.
Look, pointing to this is the worst arguement you could possibly use. Because, 20 years ago, he was still the same Sadaam Hussein. Only then, we considered him an ally. We armed him. And if you want to point to him gassing the Kurds, two things: 1. Where do you think he got the chemicals to make the gas. Not too many country's have access to that kind of stuff. 2. There is some evidence that he might not have done it at all. That the gassings were done by the Iranians during there war near the border.How about anything about what Saddam Hussein did as a leader. He presented Hussein as if he was a good guy
Do you know what makes my blood boil? Is watching Bush do nothing AFTER he was told we were under attack. Someone had to come in and tell him that he had to go! This Leader didn't do anything until someone told him too.There's more, I just haven't seen the movie in about 7 or 8 months cause watching it makes my blood boil.
Billo_Really said:Do you know what makes my blood boil? Is watching Bush do nothing AFTER he was told we were under attack. Someone had to come in and tell him that he had to go! This Leader didn't do anything until someone told him too.
..."Huh, Mr. President, the country is under attack"...."I heard you the first time....where was I...oh yes....now Benny went over to the bear...but THAT was what he needed to do at that particular moment.
I could cut him some slack if you think all these attacks against Clinton are getting a little ridiculous.
SixStringHero said:I wonder how many people actually watched Fahrenhiet 9/11 and FahrenHYPE 9/11. I did this so I could remain objective. Both are propaganda, and I feel the truth lies somewhere in the middle.
I don't appreciate being lied to in a so called "documentary." Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the point of a documentary to inform the viewer of facts and give an objective non-biased assessment of the subject matter at hand?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?