- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41,104
- Reaction score
- 12,202
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
His letters from jail were pretty telling.
Ok...If you say so...:shrug: He was convicted, so I guess its a moot point now right?
:dohWell not really - you were saying that the guy wasn't a racist. Clearly he was.
:doh
His letters do not say he is a racist.
Well not really - you were saying that the guy wasn't a racist. Clearly he was.
Don't know the man, and haven't seen any jail letters from him, and I don't know his heart...Can you produce the letters, or a link to them so I can see them?
iLOLI am not talking to you because you cannot be reasoned with. I'd put you on ignore, but I am consistently flabbergasted by some of the things you post, and if I ignore you, I might miss some of the lulz.
Well not really - you were saying that the guy wasn't a racist. Clearly he was.
Trix is for kids. (Just an FYI.)Excon,
How again did the police track him down?
This should be interesting.
Trix is for kids. (Just an FYI.)
Why do you keep asking what is already known and irrelevant?
As many times as I have participated in discussions of the evidence of this case, prior to, during, and after his last trial, you would think you would understand that I know.
And in reply to it; Big deal. He didn't get to carry through with what he intended to do. :shrug:
Your question, and by virtue of it, any point you are trying to make is irrelevant, as it changes nothing.
Sorry, still not seeing anything overtly racist in what he says. What do you think is?
And I'll give to you there that is a good point. Probably weighed heavily in jurors decision.Except for the FACT that it is a big deal.
Ask the jurors if they think it is relevant that he fled the scene and did not report and needed to be tracked down based on eyewitness information.
Of course it is a big deal. Only a person trying to evade prosecution would act in such a way. And the jurors would be right to assume that.
Would you have left the scene and not immediately reported it to the police once you felt you were safe?
And I'll give to you there that is a good point. Probably weighed heavily in jurors decision.
Sorry, still not seeing anything overtly racist in what he says. What do you think is?
Thanks, I cannot see how it would not weigh on their minds.
Not that it matters in the case or would change the outcome...but he strikes me as one of those people who rather than mellowing with alcohol "loosening up" - he becomes more aggressive. My gut says that this would have just been a few testosterone driven exchanges if he didn't have a gun. But frankly I think the alcohol fueled his aggression. I believe carrying under the influence is a serious issue. But I am sure many would wholeheartedly disagree.
Well, we all have things in our mind about what others may be like based on limited information, Lord knows I am guilty of the same. I also don't know that he was 'under the influence' either. He said he only had two drinks at the wedding, (although I am aware that is the standard answer whether one is drunk or not) but we just don't know that for a fact.
Like I said, I am if nothing consistent. The jury convicted, so they weighed the evidence and based on that he is guilty.
In that situation, I don't even know if I would have asked them to turn anything down...I mean hell, it's not my hearing they're ruining....The questions I would have had as a juror would have been for the investigating officers, such as why wasn't the adjacent parking lot searched? Why did Dunn leave the scene, I mean even if no one was hit, he discharged a weapon, if he thought he was right, he would have no reason to leave.
*Sigh* I don't know....
:lamo
Wrong. An innocent man will be doing time for a crime he did not commit. And the community is a lot safer with the real thug having killed.
Inflaming the passions of others is fun? Because I see right through you.
Troll
/ignore
No kidding. Talk about no evidence....a dead guy is labeled a thug for playing loud music. There was no weapon (no evidence). Dead guy did nothing but play loud music AND piss of shooter. BUT!!! He's a thug. /sarcasm. Shooter kills **innocent** man, and that's a fact...but he's **innocent** and the other guy is a thug. :doh
"It's spooky how racist everyone is up here and how biased toward blacks the courts are. This jail is full of blacks and they all act like thugs," he notes. He goes on to say "This may sound a bit radical but if more people would arm themselves and kill these **** idiots when they're threatening you, eventually they may take the hint and change their behavior,"
And here are some choice excerpts:
What a racist maniac. Its clear that he doesnt like blacks and if given the opportunity would kill them all if he had the chance. This pretty much confirms he's a sociopathic racist who wanted to kill those kids because he didnt like them.
Except that it really isn't. D'oh!Except for the FACT that it is a big deal.
How many times in this thread does it need to be said?Ask the jurors if they think it is relevant that he fled the scene and did not report and needed to be tracked down based on eyewitness information.
Wrong. Only in someones cynical thoughts would they assume such.Only a person trying to evade prosecution would act in such a way.
Wrong again.And the jurors would be right to assume that.
It depends. And that is what you seem not to be understanding. People act differently.Would you have left the scene and not immediately reported it to the police once you felt you were safe?
:dohI'm not going to bother with posting anything else, because you won't see it anyway.
Said the one engaging in exactly that behavior.Inflaming the passions of others is fun? Because I see right through you.
Troll
Get a grip. This isn't about me or your incorrect and imaginative thoughts about me.Excon just enjoys being a sphincter orifice (I'll let you decipher). The really scary part is that he might actually believe the tripe he posts here. Now that would really be scary.
Then debate the actual evidence.No kidding. Talk about no evidence....
Stop being dishonest. No one here labeled him a thug for playing loud music.a dead guy is labeled a thug for playing loud music.
Wrong. There is evidence, as testified to.There was no weapon (no evidence).
Wrong.Dead guy did nothing but play loud music AND piss of shooter.
Shooter did not kill an **innocent** person. That person was the one who was pissed and started threatening Dunn's life. Dunn's reaction was out of fear.Shooter kills **innocent** man, and that's a fact...but he's **innocent** and the other guy is a thug. :doh
Clearly you do not know what the term racist means. And your confirmationAnd here are some choice excerpts:
"It's spooky how racist everyone is up here and how biased toward blacks the courts are. This jail is full of blacks and they all act like thugs," he notes. He goes on to say "This may sound a bit radical but if more people would arm themselves and kill these **** idiots when they're threatening you, eventually they may take the hint and change their behavior,"
What a racist maniac. Its clear that he doesnt like blacks and if given the opportunity would kill them all if he had the chance. This pretty much confirms he's a sociopathic racist who wanted to kill those kids because he didnt like them.
I think it was 3 or 4 drinks and a champagne toast. On top of that, they left before the even the cake was served.
Legally drunk? Maybe, maybe not. Under the influence to be certain.
I agree. He left. Much bigger deal. If he was in fear for his life, he would have reported to the police.Possibly, but the greater thing for me, is that he left. Had he waited for police, and been able to be evaluated, it might have turned out better for him...Anyway, trial done...Now we can find the next white guy to crucify.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?