• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Michael Cohen to go before House Intel again next week

JANFU

Land by the Gulf Stream
Dungeon Master
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
70,036
Reaction score
53,380
Location
Best Coast Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Michael Cohen to go before House Intel again next week | TheHill

Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen is planning to return to the House Intelligence Committee to continue his closed-door testimony next week.

“We talked about a lot of things,” Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), a member of the Intelligence Committee, said when asked about what committee lawmakers had learned in the first six hours of Cohen’s testimony Thursday. “We are just now getting into some of the more substantive issues.”
From what I hear closed and public testimony.
Could be 2 days
Later jn Month, Sater in public testimony

Felix Sater, Trump Tower Moscow lead, explained - Vox

'Individual 2': Mob-linked felon and Trump associate Felix Sater could be key to Robert Mueller’s case

'Individual 2': Mob-linked felon and Trump associate Felix Sater could be key to Robert Mueller’s case

Waiting for Ways & Means to subpoena Trumps tax records.

Cohen can and has caused Trump harm.
 
Last edited:
So this is Trump's Russia connection? Sater is a guy who left Russia as a kid. He was 8 years old when he ended up in New York. He was working for Trump and the FBI at the same time.

Is the plan to go after Trump for false testimony in a 2013 law suit where he says he didn't know Sater or wouldn't recognize him? Is that what the plan is now?
 
The tower was never built in Moscow.
There is no collusion.

Plus, yesterday while under oath, Cohen said Trump did not tell him to lie and he even admitted Trump did not collude with Russians.

This is a nothingburger.
 
House Intelligence Committee.

Talk about an oxymoron.
 
Michael Cohen to go before House Intel again next week | TheHill


From what I hear closed and public testimony.
Could be 2 days
Later jn Month, Sater in public testimony

Felix Sater, Trump Tower Moscow lead, explained - Vox

'Individual 2': Mob-linked felon and Trump associate Felix Sater could be key to Robert Mueller’s case



Waiting for Ways & Means to subpoena Trumps tax records.

Cohen can and has caused Trump harm.

Yeah, me too, since they don't have that authority
 
The tower was never built in Moscow.
There is no collusion.

Plus, yesterday while under oath, Cohen said Trump did not tell him to lie and he even admitted Trump did not collude with Russians.

This is a nothingburger.

As the investigations continue, and more information about the rank corruption comes out, I'm really going to enjoy the exquisite pain it causes to Trump sycophants.
 
Yeah, me too, since they don't have that authority

Can you prove that House Committee can not access Trumps tax records?
 
Can you prove that House Committee can not access Trumps tax records?

They can't subpoena his tax returns. They can only request them from the SECTRES.
 
They can't subpoena his tax returns. They can only request them from the SECTRES.

Pardon me, but I do need credible links. Not just what you post as a fact
 
The law says "request" not subpoena.

Learn to do some research vice regurgitating the bull**** you're handlers tell you.

LOL :roll:

26 U.S. Code SS 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

(f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress
(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
 
Pardon me, but I do need credible links. Not just what you post as a fact

I thought you knew everything...

Attention has focused on a provision of the law known as 26 U.S. Code § 6103. This allows the chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, among other senior lawmakers, to seek returns by sending a written request to the Treasury Secretary. Officially, the decision to release the returns would be made by the Treasury Secretary...

Can House Democrats release Donald Trump's tax returns? | PolitiFact

Left wing source with a link to the law, just for you.
 
LOL :roll:

26 U.S. Code SS 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

(f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress
(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.

You're misinterprating the law. There are two links in this thread that prove you wrong.
 
The law says "request" not subpoena.

Learn to do some research vice regurgitating the bull**** you're handlers tell you.

No, the law gives them the right to demand it through the 'request'.

(f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress
(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation

Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request

IOW, the secretary has no choice.

Please learn to know what you're babbling about before actually babbling.
 
LOL :roll:

26 U.S. Code SS 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

(f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress
(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.

True and add in Trumps CFO will be testifying before the Committee, voluntary or with a subpoena he will testify in the next 2 months or so. My money is on closed then open testimony Weisselberg will testify.

Cohen bodies, Weisselburgm money for costs

Question I have- Cohen testified that Trump would increase/ decrease property values for insurance and banks valuations and much lower for local/Federal tax worth. Are fraud investigations/ possibly charges for Trump & Trump family according to US Laws a possibility from SDNY?
 
So this is Trump's Russia connection? Sater is a guy who left Russia as a kid. He was 8 years old when he ended up in New York. He was working for Trump and the FBI at the same time.

Is the plan to go after Trump for false testimony in a 2013 law suit where he says he didn't know Sater or wouldn't recognize him? Is that what the plan is now?

Felix Sater is more than just a guy who was born in Russia and left when he was 8 years old, that's not the whole story behind Felix Sater. He's a damn 'former' mobster, as they all are in Trump's world. Felix Sater can easily be described as a double-dealer, working both sides.

He helped the United States hunt down Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda terrorists. He took down mobsters. He provided intelligence to stop the attempted murder of an American president.

He also participated in a large-scale Wall Street scam, went to jail for cutting a man’s face with a broken margarita glass during a bar fight and spent a year in jail for assault and then had trouble finding work after he was released. Sater then decided that he would start his own company called White Rock — but it did some illegal stuff. He relied on a “pump-and-dump” scheme, where his company bought really cheap stocks and tried to sell them at much higher prices to gullible bidders. He suckered investors out of around $40 million, court records show.

This is where Sater’s ties to the mafia interested law enforcement: At least five different New York City crime families were involved in the scheme. It surely formed part of the mob’s ties to the illicit stock trade around the mid-1990s. What’s more, Sater’s father — a mob boss in his own right — had connections to other criminals, and one of his associates helped protect Sater’s business.

The FBI, as part of a larger investigation named “Operation Street Cleaner,” went after Sater and those involved in his business. Sater left his organization about 18 months after he started it, but he was still a person of interest, and he eventually turned himself in and pleaded guilty to his crimes. The FBI said they would let him go as long as he continued to provide intelligence for the government, an obligation which he is still carrying out today.

He helped Trump during his presidential campaign to put his name on a tower in Moscow. He’s a real-life international man of mystery who could be a key link to Trump’s ties with high-level Russians — including Russian President Vladimir Putin. Felix Sater is a man with a very dark and suspicious character. I'm buying extra popcorn to watch his testimony.
 
I thought you knew everything...
.

Me I am waiting for your reply to JasperL
I do enjoy a beheading, political and post

LOL :roll:

26 U.S. Code SS 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

(f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress
(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.
 
No, the law gives them the right to demand it through the 'request'.

(f) Disclosure to Committees of Congress
(1) Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation

Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request

IOW, the secretary has no choice.

Please learn to know what you're babbling about before actually babbling.

So, you're saying that legislation gives Congress the "right" (your word) to "demand" (also your word) confidential documents, belonging to a United States citizen, no warrant, no subpoena, no probable cause, or anything?

Have you ever even HEARD of the 4th Amendment?

The right of the people to be secure[tb] in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Yeah, good luck. :lamo
 
So, you're saying that legislation gives Congress the "right" (your word) to "demand" (also your word) confidential documents, belonging to a United States citizen, no warrant, no subpoena, no probable cause, or anything?

Yes, the law gives them that power. Please try and improve your reading.
Have you ever even HEARD of the 4th Amendment?

Yes, it's irrelevant here. Getting the POTUS's tax returns is not unreasonable. It's nothing I'd expect you do understand.
Yeah, good luck. :lamo

Fun to watch you sputter and wheeze when you're caught yet again talking about things you don't understand.
 
Yes, the law gives them that power. Please try and improve your reading.

Yes, it's irrelevant here. Getting the POTUS's tax returns is not unreasonable. It's nothing I'd expect you do understand.

Fun to watch you sputter and wheeze when you're caught yet again talking about things you don't understand.

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, says so right here,

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof...

and NO legislation overrules The Constitution.

It fun to watch Leftists make fools of themselves. :lamo
 
The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, says so right here,

Yes, and no one has argued otherwise. Spare me your pathetic strawmen, please.
and NO legislation overrules The Constitution.

It fun to watch Leftists make fools of themselves. :lamo

The Constitution hasn't been overruled nor has the been found unconstitutional.

Always a pleasure to correct the laughable ignorance of Marxists, comrade.
 
Yes, and no one has argued otherwise. Spare me your pathetic strawmen, please.

The Constitution hasn't been overruled nor has the been found unconstitutional.

Always a pleasure to correct the laughable ignorance of Marxists, comrade.

That's because 24USC1603 doesn't give Congress the "right" to "demand" confidential documents belonging to a citizen of the republic.
 
That's because 24USC1603 doesn't give Congress the "right" to "demand" confidential documents belonging to a citizen of the republic.

Yes, they have the power to do so, no matter how filled with impotent rage that makes you.

Again, always happy to explain simple constitutional matters to Marxists, comrade.
 
Back
Top Bottom