Fledermaus
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 122,402
- Reaction score
- 32,795
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
"The explosion destroyed the jet liner's cabin - the plane was hit at the spotSource: http://en.censor.net.ua/r328926Source: Boeing MH-17 downing: SUBMUNITIONS OF RUSSIAN MISSILE BUK-M1-2 (AKA SA-17) WHICH DOWNED THE MALAYSIAN BOEING MH-17. EXCLUSIVE PHOTO REPORT - Netherlands, terrorism, Yurii Butusov, Boeing 777 Malaysia Airlines, Buk, Russian Terrorists, Boeing MH-17 do
"After the wreckage had been put together in the hangar and the nature of the destruction had been established, it became clear that no air-launched missile or aircraft gun could bring such massive destruction to a jet liner.
The anti-aircraft missile version became the major one. The spider-work on analysis of warheads of modern anti-aircraft missiles continued.Source: http://en.censor.net.ua/r328926Source: Boeing MH-17 downing: SUBMUNITIONS OF RUSSIAN MISSILE BUK-M1-2 (AKA SA-17) WHICH DOWNED THE MALAYSIAN BOEING MH-17. EXCLUSIVE PHOTO REPORT - Netherlands, terrorism, Yurii Butusov, Boeing 777 Malaysia Airlines, Buk, Russian Terrorists, Boeing MH-17 do
Boeing MH-17 downing: SUBMUNITIONS OF RUSSIAN MISSILE BUK-M1-2 (AKA SA-17) WHICH DOWNED THE MALAYSIAN BOEING MH-17. EXCLUSIVE PHOTO REPORT - Netherlands, terrorism, Yurii Butusov, Boeing 777 Malaysia Airlines, Buk, Russian Terrorists, Boeing MH-17 do
Apparently the destructive force of the missile striking MH-17 was too large to be an Air-to-Air missile.
I believe an SU-25 has the capability to bring down MH17, from the left side.
//
A SU-25 CAN bring down an airliner. Under very limited circumstances. Circumstances that likely WERE NOT met in the MH-17 crash.
BTW - What does the side matter?