• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mexican Government Proves to be Supreme Hypocrite

jamesrage

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
34,398
Reaction score
16,251
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Mexico being hypocrites again when it comes to illegal immigration.

Mexican Government Proves to be Supreme Hypocrite

The New American said:
Raul Diaz of the Mexican Superintendence of Tax Administration confirmed this week that the Mexican government intends to build a wall along the Mexican/Guatemalan border. Diaz claims that the official purpose of the wall is to prevent the passage of contraband, but has also admitted “It could also prevent the free passage of illegal immigrants.”

Defending the decision to construct the wall, Mexico’s National Commission on Human Rights states that 500,000 people from Central America cross into Mexico illegally every year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rogue

Conspiratist
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Messages
608
Reaction score
53
Location
North Carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Mexico being hypocrites again when it comes to illegal immigration.


Mexican Government Proves to be Supreme Hypocrite

Raul Diaz of the Mexican Superintendence of Tax Administration confirmed this week that the Mexican government intends to build a wall along the Mexican/Guatemalan border. Diaz claims that the official purpose of the wall is to prevent the passage of contraband, but has also admitted “It could also prevent the free passage of illegal immigrants.”

Defending the decision to construct the wall, Mexico’s National Commission on Human Rights states that 500,000 people from Central America cross into Mexico illegally every year.

The proposal to construct the wall appears to go against the principles held by Mexican President Felipe Calderon, who, when speaking out against the state of Arizona for its tough immigration measure, remarked, “Criminalizing immigration, which is a social economic phenomena, this way opens the door to intolerance, hate, and discrimination. My government cannot and will not remain indifferent when these kinds of policies go against human rights.”

Apparently, Calderon's views on border control are relative.

Dave Gibson of The Examiner notes the hypocrisy in the Mexican government’s sudden change of heart as the Mexican authorities have long criticized the United States for the construction of a fence along a United States/Mexican border. Likewise, Mexico asserts that the passage of 500,000 people from Central America into Mexico is an appropriate reason for a fence, but that many people annually cross into the state of Arizona alone. Yet, that has not stopped Mexico from criticizing Arizona for the introduction of its immigration law, Senate Bill 1070.

Of course, this is not the first time the American people have encountered hypocrisy from the Mexican government regarding illegal immigration. In an article entitled “How Mexico Treats Its Illegal Aliens,” conservative writer Michelle Malkin outlined Mexico’s treatment of illegal aliens, which could be dubbed “intolerant, hateful, and discriminatory,” in the words of Calderon. Mexico demands a number of things from its illegals, particularly that they contribute to the “economic and social interests” of the country, while not upsetting “the equilibrium of the national demographics.” But can’t that be construed as a form of racial and ethnic profiling — the same over which the Mexican government articulated concerns when Arizona passed its immigration law?

It seems, however, that the old adage “what goes around comes around” is true. Just as Mexico has opposed construction of an American/Mexican border fence, the Guatemalan government is now speaking out against the Mexican government for the same reason and with the same arguments used by the Mexican government against the United States.
On the plus side, if mexico does build a wall across it's southern border, mexico would have to shut up it's whinning about the US/mexico wall. A mexican wall at the southern border of mexico would also help deter unwanted uninvited illegal border jumpers into the US, because most of the illegals from latin America south of mexico are just crossing mexico on their way to break into the US. You would also expect mexico to use somewhat harsher methods to stop illegal immigration into mexico, than our own hands tied behind their back BP are allowed to. Our own BP might pick up a few good pointers from mexico on how to stop unwanted uninvited illegal border jumpers from breaking in, which could be implemented after the hispandering maobama is kicked out.
 
Last edited:

samsmart

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
10,316
Reaction score
6,470
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Mexico being hypocrites again when it comes to illegal immigration.


Mexican Government Proves to be Supreme Hypocrite

Raul Diaz of the Mexican Superintendence of Tax Administration confirmed this week that the Mexican government intends to build a wall along the Mexican/Guatemalan border. Diaz claims that the official purpose of the wall is to prevent the passage of contraband, but has also admitted “It could also prevent the free passage of illegal immigrants.”

Defending the decision to construct the wall, Mexico’s National Commission on Human Rights states that 500,000 people from Central America cross into Mexico illegally every year.

The proposal to construct the wall appears to go against the principles held by Mexican President Felipe Calderon, who, when speaking out against the state of Arizona for its tough immigration measure, remarked, “Criminalizing immigration, which is a social economic phenomena, this way opens the door to intolerance, hate, and discrimination. My government cannot and will not remain indifferent when these kinds of policies go against human rights.”

Apparently, Calderon's views on border control are relative.

Dave Gibson of The Examiner notes the hypocrisy in the Mexican government’s sudden change of heart as the Mexican authorities have long criticized the United States for the construction of a fence along a United States/Mexican border. Likewise, Mexico asserts that the passage of 500,000 people from Central America into Mexico is an appropriate reason for a fence, but that many people annually cross into the state of Arizona alone. Yet, that has not stopped Mexico from criticizing Arizona for the introduction of its immigration law, Senate Bill 1070.

Of course, this is not the first time the American people have encountered hypocrisy from the Mexican government regarding illegal immigration. In an article entitled “How Mexico Treats Its Illegal Aliens,” conservative writer Michelle Malkin outlined Mexico’s treatment of illegal aliens, which could be dubbed “intolerant, hateful, and discriminatory,” in the words of Calderon. Mexico demands a number of things from its illegals, particularly that they contribute to the “economic and social interests” of the country, while not upsetting “the equilibrium of the national demographics.” But can’t that be construed as a form of racial and ethnic profiling — the same over which the Mexican government articulated concerns when Arizona passed its immigration law?

It seems, however, that the old adage “what goes around comes around” is true. Just as Mexico has opposed construction of an American/Mexican border fence, the Guatemalan government is now speaking out against the Mexican government for the same reason and with the same arguments used by the Mexican government against the United States.
Actually, I'd like to see how this measure got passed in the Mexican government. It could be that the Mexican legislature passed it with or without the endorsement of President Calderon. I'd really like to see whether or not Calderon approved of this measure.

It's quite disengenuous to say that the Mexican President is hypocritical if he was against this measure but the Mexican legislature may have passed it anyway.

I'm not saying I'm for or against this measure, I'm just saying there may be more to this than meets the eye.
 

VanceMack

MSG Benavides TAB
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
73,527
Reaction score
30,958
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
The hypocisy is something I have pointed out on many occasions. For as many problems as we have with illegal immigration and disagreements about potential solutions, mexico is the both the dog and the flea biting the dog. They ignore the illegal EMMIGRATION problem becausae their citizens come to the US and send money back to mexico propping up their economy. They cry racism when people in the US take a proactive stand attempting to end the influx of illegal immigrants. However illegal immigrants in mexico are jailed. hey are shot when attempting entry through mexicos southern border. They are brutalized by their police and have no status and certainly arent offered anything resembling 'rights'.
 

jamesrage

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
34,398
Reaction score
16,251
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
On the plus side, if mexico does build a wall across it's southern border, mexico would have to shut up it's whinning about the US/mexico wall. .
They have better laws against illegal immigration than we do and they still had the nerve to criticize the US for sticking a de-balled national guard on the border and the nerve to criticize Arizona, Oklahoma or any other state that enacts laws against illegal immigration



A mexican wall at the southern border of mexico would also help deter unwanted uninvited illegal border jumpers into the US, because most of the illegals from latin America south of mexico are just crossing mexico on their way to break into the US. You would also expect mexico to use somewhat harsher methods to stop illegal immigration into mexico, than our own hands tied behind their back BP are allowed to.
A wall on Mexico's southern border will just only help Mexico. The only thing it means for the US is that more the illegals coming into the country will be from Mexico.

Our own BP might pick up a few good pointers from mexico on how to stop unwanted uninvited illegal border jumpers from breaking in, which could be implemented after the hispandering maobama is kicked out
Sure and they will end Obama care, stop Gitmo from closing, and all sorts of other fairy tales after Obama is kicked out the republicans have the majority. If you believe that then you are like the stupid chick who believes what ever some loser tells her in order to sleep with her. I do not remember republicans ending Clinton's DADT and making it back the way it was before DADT. They have been just as big spenders as the democrats were. They are for big government just as much as the democrats are. I do not remember republicans repealing the Brady Bill and they have been some on the biggest advocates of illegal immigration just as much as their democrat counterparts. Just like some loser lying to some dumb chick to get her in bed the republicans are telling you a bunch of BS so that you will vote for them. The only way illegal immigration will be fixed is with states following Oklahoma and Arizona's lead.

hispandering maobama
Every time the left called Bush a dictator,fascist, warmonger or some other they got treated just like the JFK didn't shoot Kennedy loons or the government invented aids and crack to kill the black man loonies. How would comparing Obama to Moa be any different?

As for hispandering its a totally inaccurate term. Here is why it is inaccurate-

1. It implies that all Americans of Hispanic decent are for illegal immigration, this is not true.

2.It implies that pro-illegal scum in officer are just tossing the Hispanics. This is false. They are pandering to everyone who supports illegal immigration. The open borders twits, globalist scum, the traitors who hire illegals and anyone else who can vote and supports illegal immigration, not just Americans of Hispanic decent.
 
Last edited:

Rogue

Conspiratist
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Messages
608
Reaction score
53
Location
North Carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
They have better laws against illegal immigration than we do and they still had the nerve to criticize the US for sticking a de-balled national guard on the border and the nerve to criticize Arizona, Oklahoma or any other state that enacts laws against illegal immigration
Well yes, the corrupt mexican gov doesn't have anything like the marxist/socialist amnesty democrats fighting all attempts to crack down on border enforcement like in the US. And yes the hypocritical mexican gov basically screams and hollers at anything that slows down the flow of uninvited unwanted illegal border jumpers into the US who in turn send money back to mexico.

A wall on Mexico's southern border will just only help Mexico. The only thing it means for the US is that more the illegals coming into the country will be from Mexico.
I disagree. Unless you're saying that the mexican gov is helping the illegals to the south of mexico cross through mexico and break into the US, otherwise, a certain number of illegals are attempting to break in from mexico independently of all of the guatamalans, etc. who are breaking in. Cutting down on the guatamalans, etc., breaking in into mexico with the intent to break into the US shouldn't affect the number mexicans who are ready to break into the US.

Sure and they will end Obama care, stop Gitmo from closing, and all sorts of other fairy tales after Obama is kicked out the republicans have the majority. If you believe that then you are like the stupid chick who believes what ever some loser tells her in order to sleep with her. I do not remember republicans ending Clinton's DADT and making it back the way it was before DADT. They have been just as big spenders as the democrats were. They are for big government just as much as the democrats are. I do not remember republicans repealing the Brady Bill and they have been some on the biggest advocates of illegal immigration just as much as their democrat counterparts. Just like some loser lying to some dumb chick to get her in bed the republicans are telling you a bunch of BS so that you will vote for them. The only way illegal immigration will be fixed is with states following Oklahoma and Arizona's lead.
Well, I'm thinking that the candidates that the tea party have gotten nominated and hopefully elected in Nov are not your traditional RINO republicans. I believe that the republican party is going to be much more conservative and fiscally responsible in the future. The most important thing that can be done about illegal immigration is voting as many marxist/socialist amnesty democratic politicians out of office as possible. The current republican party has been fighting illegal immigration and the current democratic party has been pushing for amnesty. And yes the fed gov needs for every state to pass tough on illegals, tough on the scumbag employers of illegals laws at the state level to have a united front of states and fed gov enforcing immigration laws to force illegals to self deport themselves.

Every time the left called Bush a dictator,fascist, warmonger or some other they got treated just like the JFK didn't shoot Kennedy loons or the government invented aids and crack to kill the black man loonies. How would comparing Obama to Moa be any different?

As for hispandering its a totally inaccurate term. Here is why it is inaccurate-

1. It implies that all Americans of Hispanic decent are for illegal immigration, this is not true.

2.It implies that pro-illegal scum in officer are just tossing the Hispanics. This is false. They are pandering to everyone who supports illegal immigration. The open borders twits, globalist scum, the traitors who hire illegals and anyone else who can vote and supports illegal immigration, not just Americans of Hispanic decent.
Maobama couldn't even get a gov security clearance, because of his radical marxist associations, if he hadn't been elected President by a bunch of gullable fools who currently have buyers remorse.

I'm sorry but my use of the term "hispandering" is VERY accurate. In every case that I've used the term his-pandering I'm referring to the kissing of tribally ethnocenntric his-panic azz for votes by the marxist/socialist amnesty democratic party. The kissing of hispanic azz by the amnesty democrats doesn't mean at all that all hispanics are pro-illegal, it just means that the amnesty democrats are indeed blatantly kissing hispanic azz for votes. Apparently, though, about two out of three hispanics are pro illegal or vote for pro illegal amnesty democratic candidates?
 
Last edited:

jamesrage

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
34,398
Reaction score
16,251
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Well yes, the corrupt mexican gov doesn't have anything like the marxist/socialist amnesty democrats fighting all attempts to crack down on border enforcement like in the US. And yes the hypocritical mexican gov basically screams and hollers at anything that slows down the flow of uninvited unwanted illegal border jumpers into the US who in turn send money back to mexico.
Mexico will still scream at us for trying to crack down on illegal immigration and idiots will still give Mexico a pass.



I disagree. Unless you're saying that the mexican gov is helping the illegals to the south of mexico cross through mexico and break into the US, otherwise, a certain number of illegals are attempting to break in from mexico independently of all of the guatamalans, etc. who are breaking in. Cutting down on the guatamalans, etc., breaking in into mexico with the intent to break into the US shouldn't affect the number mexicans who are ready to break into the US.
I didn't say Mexico will be helping Guatemalans and etc. A wall on Mexico's Southern border will just mean Mexicans will be replacing all the Guatemalans and everyone else who used to get through Mexico's southern border.


Well, I'm thinking that the candidates that the tea party have gotten nominated and hopefully elected in Nov are not your traditional RINO republicans. I believe that the republican party is going to be much more conservative and fiscally responsible in the future. The most important thing that can be done about illegal immigration is voting as many marxist/socialist amnesty democratic politicians out of office as possible.
The republican party is telling you bs to get elected. At most they might try to sneak something into a bill that is doomed to fail and claimed they tried and never bring up the subject again.


The current republican party has been fighting illegal immigration and the current democratic party has been pushing for amnesty.

Only because midterms are coming up. Thats why McCain claims to support sb 1070.

Maobama couldn't even get a gov security clearance, because of his radical marxist associations, if he hadn't been elected President by a bunch of gullable fools who currently have buyers remorse.
Comparing Obama to a brutal Chinese dictator will only discredit the cause.


I'm sorry but my use of the term "hispandering" is VERY accurate. In every case that I've used the term his-pandering I'm referring to the kissing of tribally ethnocenntric his-panic azz for votes by the marxist/socialist amnesty democratic party. The kissing of hispanic azz by the amnesty democrats doesn't mean at all that all hispanics are pro-illegal, it just means that the amnesty democrats are indeed blatantly kissing hispanic azz for votes. Apparently, though, about two out of three hispanics are pro illegal or vote for pro illegal amnesty democratic candidates?
Its not a accurate term because Obama is tossing the salad of any and everyone who supports illegal immigration regardless of race or ethnicity and there are probably more Americans of European decent who support illegal immigration then there are of Americans of Hispanic decent who support illegal immigration.
 

Rogue

Conspiratist
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Messages
608
Reaction score
53
Location
North Carolina
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Mexico will still scream at us for trying to crack down on illegal immigration and idiots will still give Mexico a pass.
True. And most of the idiots giving mexico a pass are marxist/socialits amnesty democrats.

I didn't say Mexico will be helping Guatemalans and etc. A wall on Mexico's Southern border will just mean Mexicans will be replacing all the Guatemalans and everyone else who used to get through Mexico's southern border.
And I was saying that logistically only so many mexicans can break into the US at any one time, regardless of the guatamalans, etc. So it makes sense that you cut down on the guatamalans, etc., you cut down on the total number of illegals breaking into the US.

The republican party is telling you bs to get elected. At most they might try to sneak something into a bill that is doomed to fail and claimed they tried and never bring up the subject again.
Well I'm for the republican party to be purged of it's RINOs. These Tea Party republicans will be watched very closely by the Tea Party itself and if they come up short the Tea Party will let them know.

Only because midterms are coming up. Thats why McCain claims to support sb 1070.
Agreed. McCain is a progressive RINO. McCain will say whatever it takes to get reelected.

Comparing Obama to a brutal Chinese dictator will only discredit the cause.
Well, Mao may not be the best marxist to compare obama to, but maobama kind of flows. Most Americans do feel that obama is a marxist/socialist. If it walks, quacks like a marxist/socialist, it must be....

Its not a accurate term because Obama is tossing the salad of any and everyone who supports illegal immigration regardless of race or ethnicity and there are probably more Americans of European decent who support illegal immigration then there are of Americans of Hispanic decent who support illegal immigration.
Maybe so, but I said that I'm specifically using the term hispandering to refer to the amnesty democrats kissing hispanic azz for their votes and trying to engineer an amnesty for illegal hispanic future democratic voters if amnestied to create a huge new hispanic democratic voter bloc that would keep the marxist/socialist amnesty democrats in power for decades to further their radical leftist agenda.
 
Last edited:

jamesrage

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
34,398
Reaction score
16,251
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
True. And most of the idiots giving mexico a pass are marxist/socialits amnesty democrats.
There are also globalist scumbag republicans who will give Mexico a pass too.

And I was saying that logistically only so many mexicans can break into the US at any one time, regardless of the guatamalans, etc. So it makes sense that you cut down on the guatamalans, etc., you cut down on the total number of illegals breaking into the US.
There will be more Mexicans replacing the Guatemalans and other south Americans, not less illegals altogether. Think about why does Mexico encourages millions of thier citizens to sneak into the US. Remittances. How much money do illegals send back home? So it is in Mexico's interest to weasel out the competition by building a wall on their southern border.


Well I'm for the republican party to be purged of it's RINOs. These Tea Party republicans will be watched very closely by the Tea Party itself and if they come up short the Tea Party will let them know.
Is the tea party a actual 3rd party or are they just a branch of the republican party?

Agreed. McCain is a progressive RINO. McCain will say whatever it takes to get reelected.

Probably just like those tea party republicans. They will promise that they are not like the other guy for your vote and once elected do the same **** that had cost the other side their office. Sure when they get to office they will try to attach an amendment repeal Obama-care to a very unpopular bill and claim that they tried and will ignore the issue afterwords.


Well, Mao may not be the best marxist to compare obama to, but maobama kind of flows. Most Americans do feel that obama is a marxist/socialist. If it walks, quacks like a marxist/socialist, it must be....
There are different levels of Marxism and socialism. Comparing Obama to a brutal communist dictator is like comparing a shop lifter to bank robber or car jacker.

Maybe so, but I said that I'm specifically using the term hispandering to refer to the amnesty democrats kissing hispanic azz for their votes and trying to engineer an amnesty for illegal hispanic future democratic voters if amnestied to create a huge new hispanic democratic voter bloc that would keep the marxist/socialist amnesty democrats in power for decades to further their radical leftist agenda
It does no good for pro-illegals politicians to toss the salad of illegals for votes. So whose asses do you think they are going to stick their tonges in in order to toss the salad for votes? Its going to be the traitorous scum who hire illegals, i the people who harbor illegals, the people that aid illegals, the open borders crowd, the people who support amnesty and can vote. That is who pro-illegals politicians are tossing the salad of for votes and most of these voters they are seeking are white non-Hispanic decent.
 
Last edited:

Littlejenny

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Mexico has figured out they can be as hypocritical and arrogant on this issue as they please because they know the our government as well as so called "political leaders" will simply ignore or tolerate it.

Mexico has nothing to lose because the United States will never call mexico on it, at least not this current administration. We're probably paying for the fence.
 
Top Bottom