Media Matters says that Glenn Beck's co-hosts blame Keith Olbermann for the CT workplace shooting.
Media Matters Gives Glenn Beck’s Co-Hosts The Shirley Sherrod Edited Audio Treatment (Update) | Mediaite
Yes, they're deceptive on purpose. For the news value. For the scoop. For the entertainment value. I hope that some day soon we tackle all of the lies and deception that goes on in the name of free speech. Just plain wrong. And the bad part is that lots of people believe this trash.
Am I missing the link to the Media Matter's story?
Am I missing the link to the Media Matter's story?
Am I missing the link to the Media Matter's story?
Correction: The original headline on this clip did not make clear that Beck's co-hosts were being satirical when they linked MSNBC host Keith Olbermann to the Manchester shooting. The original clip also did not include their subsequent statements that Olbermann was not responsible for the shooting. Media Matters regrets the error.
Not anymore: Beck sidekicks equate linking Beck to CA shooter with blaming Olbermann for Manchester rampage* | Media Matters for America
Note disclaimer at bottom:
Anything else I can do for you?
thank goodness they admitted their error.
Not anymore: Beck sidekicks equate linking Beck to CA shooter with blaming Olbermann for Manchester rampage* | Media Matters for America
Note disclaimer at bottom:
Anything else I can do for you?
Wasn't good enough when Fox admitted theirs. And they didn't even own the tape.
The more I think about your post, the funnier it gets.
Apple and orange thing. They didn't not listen to all of it, they simply left some out and weren't clear. Fox never listen to all of it. Both deserving of criticism, but not at all the same thing.
Apple and orange thing. They didn't not listen to all of it, they simply left some out and weren't clear. Fox never listen to all of it. Both deserving of criticism, but not at all the same thing.
Nope. That helps. And they corrected their error, right? What's the complaint?
Ain't it amazing how Libs will give a pass to the state controlled media and not to anyone else?
Nope. That helps. And they corrected their error, right? What's the complaint?
State controlled. LOL.
No pass, but different. They made a mistake and admitted it. As they should. I would be done with the Fox thing as well if you guys quite making excuses for them.
State controlled. LOL.
No pass, but different. They made a mistake and admitted it. As they should. I would be done with the Fox thing as well if you guys quite making excuses for them.
Oh, let's see.....because immediately after they cut the audio off, Stu and Pat explained that no one but the people who actually did the deed are responsible for violence. So either they only listened to that much of the audio and immediately turned it off right before Stu and Pat explained OR they deliberatly edited it to make it look as if they were serious. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....
Let's see if this post takes on the same legs the Fox post. It won't -- because Conservatives can't be bothered. Libs seem to have nothing much else to do.
LOL. No one hear is defending Media matters, including media matters. Where's the debate?
Apple and orange thing. They didn't not listen to all of it, they simply left some out and weren't clear. Fox never listen to all of it. Both deserving of criticism, but not at all the same thing.
And they admitted their error? Gave a correction. What else would you like?
How about not deliberately edit videos to make their enemies look bad? How about being honest? Just a thought...
Boo!
If this isn't giving Media Matters a pass, I don't what is.
I agree that should not be done. No objection to that. But once done, there has to be accountability, which means stating that they left part out. I would have much more problem if they had not done that. I'll like it better if I find those who did are held accountable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?