Mainstream media figures from the New York Times to the Huffington Post to CNN are apoplectic Monday as their latest attack on Donald J. Trump, the Republican nominee for president, has crumbled yet again under the slightest bit of scrutiny. Specifically, the newest line of attack to fall apart is the criticism of Trump over Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father who spoke at the Democratic National Convention last week.
Over the weekend and for the past few days since Khan spoke alongside his wife Ghazala Khan about their son, U.S. Army Captain Humayun Khan, who was killed in Iraq in 2004, media-wide reporters, editors, producers, and anchors have tried to lay criticism on Trump over the matter. They thought they had a good one, a specific line of attack that pitted Trump against the military—and supposedly showed him as a big meanie racist in the process.
It turns out that Khan is a very big Democrat operative with extensive ties to the Clintons and their foundation. Nobody in the mainstream media bothered to research this.
It sort of explains why Khan was so dishonest in his smear of Trump.
Khizr Khan Attack on Donald Trump Goes Down in Flames
Ew. You made me click on a Breitbart link.
Do you have a more reputable source, like Al-Jazeera, RT, or The Onion?
Why is that relevant? It doesn't change anything about the narrative.It turns out that Khan is a very big Democrat operative with extensive ties to the Clintons and their foundation. Nobody in the mainstream media bothered to research this.
What are you claiming was dishonest or a smear?It sort of explains why Khan was so dishonest in his smear of Trump.
Khizr Muazzam Khan, is a Muslim Brotherhood agent, working to bring Muslims into the United States. After reading what we discovered so far, it becomes obvious that Khan wanted to ‘trump’ Trump’s Muslim immigration policy of limiting Muslim immigration into the U.S.
Khizr Muazzam Khan graduated in Punjab University Law College, as the New York Times confirms. He specialized in International Trade Law in Saudi Arabia. An interest lawyer for Islamic oil companies Khan wrote a paper, called In Defense of OPEC to defend the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries.
But more than this, Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law in the U.S. He was a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia). Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah [the works of Muhammad] — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).”
What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States | Walid Shoebat
All that being said, Trump shouldn't have attacked the man. What he should have said is that his son was over there because Hillary voted for the War and he was on record opposing it.
Walid Shoebat?
Are you ****ing serious?
Ew. You made me click on a Breitbart link.
Do you have a more reputable source, like Al-Jazeera, RT, or The Onion?
Why is that relevant? It doesn't change anything about the narrative.
What are you claiming was dishonest or a smear?
Do you have specific evidence to the effect that Breitbart reports falsely, or is this just a generic slander you have for any publication with a right wing slant?
Ew. You made me click on a Breitbart link.
Do you have a more reputable source, like Al-Jazeera, RT, or The Onion?
The factual things they mentioned.... that Khan wrote a paper in defense of OPEC and, while living in Saudi Arabia, wrote an academic work about Islamic law and acknowledged the work of a Muslim Brotherhood member, and that he works as an immigration lawyer....can be conceded as true.Khizr Muazzam Khan, is a Muslim Brotherhood agent, working to bring Muslims into the United States. After reading what we discovered so far, it becomes obvious that Khan wanted to ‘trump’ Trump’s Muslim immigration policy of limiting Muslim immigration into the U.S.
Khizr Muazzam Khan graduated in Punjab University Law College, as the New York Times confirms. He specialized in International Trade Law in Saudi Arabia. An interest lawyer for Islamic oil companies Khan wrote a paper, called In Defense of OPEC to defend the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries.
But more than this, Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law in the U.S. He was a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia). Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah [the works of Muhammad] — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).”
What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States | Walid Shoebat
Khan said that Trump wants to ban all Muslim immigration. This is false. Trump has never said he wants to do that. Khan said that he and his son would never have been in the US if Trump were President. This is false.
Do you have specific evidence to the effect that Breitbart reports falsely, or is this just a generic slander you have for any publication with a right wing slant[/B]?
Do you have specific evidence to the effect that Breitbart reports falsely, or is this just a generic slander you have for any publication with a right wing slant?
:lamo
Khizr Muazzam Khan, is a Muslim Brotherhood agent....
Yup. They found me out. I've been a secret big lib, this entire time :roll:
:lamo
What is it with the Trumpkins in the last 48 hours?Conservatives oppose Trump because we are conservative, dude. And Breitbart has become a a trash site, spitting on its' founders legacy, one step removed from a more politicized version that other Trump-favored publication, The Enquirer.
:lamo
What is it with the Trumpkins in the last 48 hours?Conservatives oppose Trump because we are conservative, dude. And Breitbart has become a a trash site, spitting on its' founders legacy, one step removed from a more politicized version that other Trump-favored publication, The Enquirer.
Most Conservatives don't oppose Trump.
The GOP establishment opposes Trump.
I think we are reliving History; Like Carter, Obama is one of the worst president in US history. The state of our economy and the world proves it. If Trump wins like Reagan he will take over the GOP. Trump is a brilliant businessman and like Reagan he will create one of the greatest periods of economic prosperity in US history. Reagan destroyed the USSR by dealing with them from a position of strength, Trump can do the same with Muslim terrorist.
I knew it. You are a liberal.
Khan said that Trump wants to ban all Muslim immigration. This is false. Trump has never said he wants to do that. Khan said that he and his son would never have been in the US if Trump were President. This is false.
Sorta. Conservatives are split, with some supporting, some not supporting, but voting for in order to oppose Hillary, and some opposing.
Among Self-Identified Conservatives:
Astonishingly, 21% already say that they plan to vote for Hillary.
That's laughable. The GOP Establishment has completely bent over to Trump and helped his campaign squash conservative revolt. The person that the GOP establishment hated isn't Trump, it's Cruz (whom they hate, hate, hate).
Trump is nothing like Reagan. He's not a brilliant businessman (in fact, he seems to suck at it, as he has significantly underperformed both the Real Estate Market and even the S&P 500), his economic ideas are a refutation of Reagans (as they were then), and Trump has no clue how to go about destroying Islamist terrorism.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?