• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Meadows 'short list' of LEAKERS

ouch

ouch

Air Muscle
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
10,185
Reaction score
8,886
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Mark Esper has been tagged a leaker as well. I personally chalk it up as being a nature of the beast - leakers within earshot of the US President. The only solution, well two solutions, would be to either surround yourself, as our president, with robots or simply perform the duties of that office and one's own actions honorably and appropriately. You know - to avoid any possible scandals du jour. Good luck!



Meadows acknowledges, "To this day I do not know how this information got out, but I have my suspicions and it's a short list. I have no doubt that it was leaked by someone who had every intention of hurting the president."

He notes how everyone has a "theory" about the leak's origins. "If I had to bet, I would say that it was probably Stephanie Grisham, Emma Doyle, or someone from the VP's team."
 
I'm sure Team Trump's reason for having "leaker lists" is completely different than Stalin's reasons for having lists of "sabateurs" and "counter-revolutionaries".

After all, Trump ****ed the flag right on stage, in front of everybody. And he said bad things about those poopoodoodoo Commie Socialist Fascist Marxist Progressive Libturds.

:rolleyes:
 
ouch said:
Mark Esper has been tagged a leaker as well. I personally chalk it up as being a nature of the beast - leakers within earshot of the US President. The only solution, well two solutions, would be to either surround yourself, as our president, with robots or simply perform the duties of that office and one's own actions honorably and appropriately. You know - to avoid any possible scandals du jour. Good luck!



Meadows acknowledges, "To this day I do not know how this information got out, but I have my suspicions and it's a short list. I have no doubt that it was leaked by someone who had every intention of hurting the president."

He notes how everyone has a "theory" about the leak's origins. "If I had to bet, I would say that it was probably Stephanie Grisham, Emma Doyle, or someone from the VP's team."
Click to expand...
The Trump executive branch had A LOT of people who had every intention of hurting the President. That's just a plain, irrefutable fact.

As Meadows says..."But it doesn't matter much now..."
 
Mycroft said:
The Trump executive branch had A LOT of people who had every intention of hurting the President. That's just a plain, irrefutable fact.
Click to expand...
"Hurting," as it witnessing him being completely unfit for office and prevaricating over whether or not to do something about it.

He was usually the one who ****ing hired them. Maybe the fact that so many people turned against him has something to do with him being an incompetent, corrupt, and authoritarian piece of shit.

But we can't possibly speak out against Dear Leader.
 
StillBallin75 said:
"Hurting," as it witnessing him being completely unfit for office and prevaricating over whether or not to do something about it.

He was usually the one who ****ing hired them. Maybe the fact that so many people turned against him has something to do with him being an incompetent, corrupt, and authoritarian piece of shit.

But we can't possibly speak out against Dear Leader.
Click to expand...


Trump hired them to be loyal and nothing else. Trump decided whether what they said or did was loyal or not.
 
Mycroft said:
The Trump executive branch had A LOT of people who had every intention of hurting the President. That's just a plain, irrefutable fact.
Click to expand...
That's on DJT. It's was his special inner circle and to be honest here, if he hadn't given them reasons to leak then the only leaks would be what he ate for lunch, etc.
 
Who has any shits to give over Mark Meadows?

The fact that this story exists at all suggests all we need to know about Trump, those around him, and those on the "suspect" list of failing the absolute loyalty test.

Those here talking about the "plain, irrefutable fact" of those not absolutely loyal to Trump tells us all we need to know about how Trump supporters view a sense of absent-minded, absent-ethics, total loyalty demanded by Trump that is rivaled only by those like Hitler, Putin, and Kim Jong-un.

This is about optics, purely, and an intention to show Trump as being what he is not. A fearless leader.

To see it supported shows how off the rails "conservatives" have become.
 
Nobody forced Trump to hire these people and if they leak stuff then it's his fault for picking unreliable people.
He has nobody to blame but himself but as per usual his fans will claim Trump is infallible and everything that goes bad for him is part of some giant conspiracy rather than Trump being incompetent.
 
Is Meadows own name on his list?
Trump himself has been quoted that Meadows had been so—in Trump’s succinct phrasing—“****ing stupid” with his recent book, which Meadows thought Trump would love.
 
ouch said:
Mark Esper has been tagged a leaker as well. I personally chalk it up as being a nature of the beast - leakers within earshot of the US President. The only solution, well two solutions, would be to either surround yourself, as our president, with robots or simply perform the duties of that office and one's own actions honorably and appropriately. You know - to avoid any possible scandals du jour. Good luck!



Meadows acknowledges, "To this day I do not know how this information got out, but I have my suspicions and it's a short list. I have no doubt that it was leaked by someone who had every intention of hurting the president."

He notes how everyone has a "theory" about the leak's origins. "If I had to bet, I would say that it was probably Stephanie Grisham, Emma Doyle, or someone from the VP's team."
Click to expand...
Or maybe someone just read his book. Thanks for the info mm.
 
mrjurrs said:
Or maybe someone just read his book. Thanks for the info mm.
Click to expand...
"Thanks for the info leaks mm." Fixed it. :)


One example below from the accurate quote above:

news.yahoo.com

Mark Meadows said he was 'nervous' when he first saw Trump's red Diet Coke button and 'braced for whatever sonic boom, breaking glass, or cloud of smoke' would come after he pressed it: book

"This button seemed like something you might use to launch a nuclear missile, or maybe to order SEAL Team Six into action," Meadows wrote in his book.
news.yahoo.com news.yahoo.com
11611c5bd1c47f55a2af4910993c1492

  • Then-Rep. Mark Meadows said he was "nervous" when he first saw a red call button on President Donald Trump's desk in the Oval Office.
  • Pressing the button would ensure a Diet Coke was delivered to Trump.
  • In his new book, Meadows wrote that he "braced for whatever sonic boom, breaking glass, or cloud of smoke" would come when it was pressed.
 
Peter said:
Nobody forced Trump to hire these people and if they leak stuff then it's his fault for picking unreliable people.
He has nobody to blame but himself but as per usual his fans will claim Trump is infallible and everything that goes bad for him is part of some giant conspiracy rather than Trump being incompetent.
Click to expand...
Occam's lawnmower?
 
Mycroft said:
The Trump executive branch had A LOT of people who had every intention of hurting the President. That's just a plain, irrefutable fact.

As Meadows says..."But it doesn't matter much now..."
Click to expand...
Ever wonder why?

I am sure you don't think it was Trumps fault. You never attribute any personal responsibility to him whatsoever
 
Mycroft said:
The Trump executive branch had A LOT of people who had every intention of hurting the President. That's just a plain, irrefutable fact.

As Meadows says..."But it doesn't matter much now..."
Click to expand...
Never seen anything like it.
 
StillBallin75 said:
Towards the end, yes, he replaced the public servant types with a lot of sycophants.
Click to expand...


"Towards the end"? He started installing sycophants from the beginning. Or, he began installing sycophants from the start. Take your pick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom