Fool me once shame on me -
Fool me twice....
... Uh, not this time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McConnell called the unusual decisions to forgo retirement following Trump’s sweeping victory last month a “partisan” gambit that would undermine the integrity of federal courts.
“They rolled the dice that a Democrat could replace them, and now that he won’t, they’re changing their plans to keep a Republican from doing it,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.
“It’s a brazen admission. And the incoming administration would be wise to explore all available recusal options with these judges, because it’s clear now that they have a political finger on the scale,” he said.
That's rich, coming from Mitch.Fool me once shame on me -
Fool me twice....
... Uh, not this time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McConnell called the unusual decisions to forgo retirement following Trump’s sweeping victory last month a “partisan” gambit that would undermine the integrity of federal courts.
“They rolled the dice that a Democrat could replace them, and now that he won’t, they’re changing their plans to keep a Republican from doing it,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.
“It’s a brazen admission. And the incoming administration would be wise to explore all available recusal options with these judges, because it’s clear now that they have a political finger on the scale,” he said.
He's just pissed because he didn't think of it.McTurtle is the last person on Earth who should gripe about this. The f***in arrogance from this asshat is unreal.
McConnell may be the most unprincipled and hypocritical pol from the old guard. He just can't keep up with the new kids.That's rich, coming from Mitch.
Regardless anyone's opinion of McConnell, he IS correct. This is nothing other than blatant partisanship on the part of those judges. Not only should they be ashamed of themselves, every decision they make should be appealed because they have proven to be partisan.
As "blatantly partisan" as McConnell's refusal to give Obama's SCOTUS pick a hearing?Regardless anyone's opinion of McConnell, he IS correct. This is nothing other than blatant partisanship on the part of those judges. Not only should they be ashamed of themselves, every decision they make should be appealed because they have proven to be partisan.
I had a similar reaction: McConnell is trying to remain relevant in MAGAland.McConnell may be the most unprincipled and hypocritical pol from the old guard. He just can't keep up with the new kids.
Tough shit for Trump's Bitch Mitch.Fool me once shame on me -
Fool me twice....
... Uh, not this time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McConnell called the unusual decisions to forgo retirement following Trump’s sweeping victory last month a “partisan” gambit that would undermine the integrity of federal courts.
“They rolled the dice that a Democrat could replace them, and now that he won’t, they’re changing their plans to keep a Republican from doing it,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.
“It’s a brazen admission. And the incoming administration would be wise to explore all available recusal options with these judges, because it’s clear now that they have a political finger on the scale,” he said.
I'm happy with that so long as we - YOU - hold Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch to the same standard.Regardless anyone's opinion of McConnell, he IS correct. This is nothing other than blatant partisanship on the part of those judges. Not only should they be ashamed of themselves, every decision they make should be appealed because they have proven to be partisan.
Tough shit for mitch. He got scotus.Regardless anyone's opinion of McConnell, he IS correct. This is nothing other than blatant partisanship on the part of those judges. Not only should they be ashamed of themselves, every decision they make should be appealed because they have proven to be partisan.
That's impossible.I'm happy with that so long as we - YOU - hold Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch to the same standard.
Like EVERYONE does not already know that the judicial branch has been politicized for years. Judges have made it obvious in recent history they are blatantly corrupt removing any doubt, if anyone had any. So it's not surprise they reversed their intention to desire after Trump won.Fool me once shame on me -
Fool me twice....
... Uh, not this time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McConnell called the unusual decisions to forgo retirement following Trump’s sweeping victory last month a “partisan” gambit that would undermine the integrity of federal courts.
“They rolled the dice that a Democrat could replace them, and now that he won’t, they’re changing their plans to keep a Republican from doing it,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.
“It’s a brazen admission. And the incoming administration would be wise to explore all available recusal options with these judges, because it’s clear now that they have a political finger on the scale,” he said.
Gosh, remember when they wouldn't let Obama place a Supreme Court Justice because it was near the end of his term?Regardless anyone's opinion of McConnell, he IS correct. This is nothing other than blatant partisanship on the part of those judges. Not only should they be ashamed of themselves, every decision they make should be appealed because they have proven to be partisan.
I assume that you apply this same standard to every judge position McConnell held open until a Republican took the white house. Might as well impeach them all, right?Regardless anyone's opinion of McConnell, he IS correct. This is nothing other than blatant partisanship on the part of those judges. Not only should they be ashamed of themselves, every decision they make should be appealed because they have proven to be partisan.
Nope.I assume that you apply this same standard to every judge position McConnell held open until a Republican took the white house. Might as well impeach them all, right?
This comes from Ol' Mitch who denied even considering Supreme court Justices 1 year before an election, etc, etcFool me once shame on me -
Fool me twice....
... Uh, not this time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
McConnell called the unusual decisions to forgo retirement following Trump’s sweeping victory last month a “partisan” gambit that would undermine the integrity of federal courts.
“They rolled the dice that a Democrat could replace them, and now that he won’t, they’re changing their plans to keep a Republican from doing it,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.
“It’s a brazen admission. And the incoming administration would be wise to explore all available recusal options with these judges, because it’s clear now that they have a political finger on the scale,” he said.
Not at all. McConnell denied Obama's SCOTUS pick a hearing.Nope.
Apples and oranges based on what you think about McConnell.
What part of "Regardless anyone's opinion of McConnell, he IS correct." do you not understand?
Wasn't that near. More than 10 months. McConnell wouldn't even bring it to an up/down vote. Or hearings.Gosh, remember when they wouldn't let Obama place a Supreme Court Justice because it was near the end of his term?
My god, this shit is so easy to throw back in your face.
Cult
Or shoving through Barrett after losing the election?As "blatantly partisan" as McConnell's refusal to give Obama's SCOTUS pick a hearing?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?