• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

McCain, why have you abandoned your anti-lobbyist stance?

obvious Child

Equal Opportunity Hater
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
19,883
Reaction score
5,120
Location
0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Other
Maybe the anti-lobbyist lobby is running low on funds. ;)
 
I don't accept your premise. Is it not possible for McCain to propose lobbying reform while also employing lobbyists? In fact, we know it's possible. Why?

McCain's campaign manager Rick Davis was a lobbyist for the HomeAlliance Group, a group of 20 organizations that included Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from 2000 to 2005. Of course, McCain introduced a bill to reduce the risk Fannie and Freddie posed to taxpayers... back in 2005.

So one of McCain's current staffers was a lobbyist for a group that included FM/FM, and yet during that time, McCain introduced legislation those groups opposed. Has Obama ever proposed a law that his biggest and most well-heeled donors would object to?

Nonetheless, what was McCain's "stance" on lobbyists in 2000? And how is that in conflict with his current employment of lobbyists?
 
Last edited:
Does the term "Campaign Finance Reform" mean anything to you Jmak?

Yes.

But I'm not sure how that leads you to conclude that he's abandoned his principles related to campaign finance reform.

Help me out...
 
Back
Top Bottom