Massive Freudian Slip By The View's Sunny Hostin - Exposes True Reason For Indictment

[Ouroboros]

Whatabouts.
Natmort was specifically arguing about the FIRST warrant. That, again, predated the creation/use of the document by GOP anti-Trumpers. But then, goalpost moving is something you do on a regular basis for your own arguments, it is not surprising you do the same for others of your ilk.

Reference a post number or don't bother me with your baloney. I'm not searching the whole thread for something you could well have borrowed from some other poster, given how often you get things confused.

 

[Gimmesometruth]

Reference

Of source it was. We not only know now there is absolutely no evidence to support the assertion Trump was collaborating with Russia, we know the FBI lied about its reliance on Clinton campaign opposition research to obtain a FISA warrant.

You're welcome to try an prove either of these assertions wrong, but we both know you will not.

That does not explain why the judge was lied to about the source of the information used to gain that first FISA warrant, does it?

Protip: Before you attempt to White Knight a fellow traveler, check what they are arguing.

 

[Ouroboros]

Protip: Before you attempt to White Knight a fellow traveler, check what they are arguing.

Also not bothering to look around for a post by a paragraph.

I can say that your drivel about "whataboutism" is always misplaced, so even in the absence of a specific citation, I'm sure you're wrong once again.

 

[Gimmesometruth]

Also not bothering to look around for a post by a paragraph.

I can say that your drivel about "whataboutism" is always misplaced, so even in the absence of a specific citation, I'm sure you're wrong once again.

WTF are you mumbling about? I just showed he was arguing about the 1st warrant, and I posted his exact quotes.
But I can understand why you have all sorts issues about my posting quotes.

 

[Ouroboros]

WTF are you mumbling about? I just showed he was arguing about the 1st warrant, and I posted his exact quotes.
But I can understand why you have all sorts issues about my posting quotes.

You posted without citing the location of the quotes because you're content to bullshit about issues you don't understand.

And your BS about whataboutism remains drivel.

I welcome anyone posting quotes in context. Of course like most Libs you post out of context because all you care about is the appearance of winning. Nothing new there.

 

[Gimmesometruth]

You posted without citing the location of the quotes

every quote contains a link....that takes you to the location.

Welcome to xenfro.

 

[Ouroboros]

every quote contains a link....that takes you to the location.

Welcome to xenfro.

Wow, it's the broken clock syndrome; you're finally right about something. You are correct that I never noticed the link function. Why you didn't say that when I first asked for a post number is open to speculation.

But it is clear why you didn't reprint the entire post. You excerpted that post the same way you excerpted my comments on the Lib lie about Confederate statues; you've learned from the MSM that partial quotes are supposedly fair (Charlottesville anyone?), and it makes it easier for you to create straw men.

Had you cited the entire post, someone might have noticed that I did respond to you regarding the first warrant.

Perhaps you'd care to show that whatever justification was used in 2014 was not just another crooked piece of manipulation by Democrats.

Since the implication was that the original warrant was totally up and up, not tainted by the Steele Dossier, I asked you to substantiate the FIRST warrant. I'd still like to see your brilliant analysis. As I've said many times, I come here primarily for the laughs.

 

[Gimmesometruth]

I never noticed the link function.

The feature has existed for more than the 5 years you've been here.

ps..I don't know where that 2nd quote you posted came from, it ain't me.

 

[Ouroboros]

The feature has existed for more than the 5 years you've been here.

ps..I don't know where that 2nd quote you posted came from, it ain't me.

If I hadn't seen the feature on earlier forums, why would I look for it? You're just farting around as usual.

The second quote is from me, and it contains the question I asked you the first time, which you ignored to make whatever point you thought you could make.

 

[Gimmesometruth]

If I hadn't seen the feature on earlier forums, why would I look for it? You're just farting around as usual.

I can't help the fact that you are ignorant about how the quote system works on a forum you have been using for over 5 years, nor am I responsible to hold your hand and explain how it all works. Sometimes you have to be responsible for your own education.

The second quote is from me, and it contains the question I asked you the first time, which you ignored to make whatever point you thought you could make.

I made my point, you adopted an argument you were ignorant about. The point was whether the first warrant pre-dated Steele. It did. I'm not required to answer your whatabouts beyond that.

 

[Ouroboros]

I can't help the fact that you are ignorant about how the quote system works on a forum you have been using for over 5 years, nor am I responsible to hold your hand and explain how it all works. Sometimes you have to be responsible for your own education.

I made my point, you adopted an argument you were ignorant about. The point was whether the first warrant pre-dated Steele. It did. I'm not required to answer your whatabouts beyond that.

I never said you were responsible; that's another of your endless straw men. I said that when I asked regarding post number, you didn't make the proper response. Your failure to do so didn't mean I held you responsible. I said I could read more into it, and of course I do. But I also gave you credit for being right about one thing in all the posts I've seen from you, so enjoy your left handed compliment.

Not knowing a particular detail about a particular forum is nowhere near as "ignorant" as your utter inability to answer the question I originally posed. What was the justification for surveiling Carter Page in the first place? You're the one claiming that Cons placed too much emphasis on the Dossier's role with respect to the second warrant. But that only matters if there was good and judicious cause to surveil Page the first time. I suspected you were validating the FBI's actions without knowing the justification for the first warrant, and your lack of response proves that you don't know much at all, though you like to play at being the know it all.

 

[rhinefire]

This was a most unfortunate slip of the tongue for Hostin. But it revealed that Trump's claim of a Witch Hunt is confirmed beyond any doubt.

This is a partial transcript from today's The View show.

Alyssa Farah Griffin: "He [Trump] is not going to jail over this."

Sunny Hostin: "I will tell you why you're wrong. Prosecutors are not only in the business of prosecuting crimes - we're in the business of sending out a message."


link to video: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/view-sunny-hostin-alyssa-farah-164240125.html ( This dialog happens at the 5:50 mark in the video)

This cinches it for Trump. Bragg's indictment is politically motivated, and now the whole world knows it. The toothpaste is finally out of the tube.

Of course, Hostin's Freudian slip is not admittable in a Court of law, but it is damning evidence in the court of public opinion. That's where Trump usually prevails.

There is zero % that Trump can get a fair trial in NYC. Or anywhere in New York, IMO. The judge will be compelled to grant a change of venue.

Who cares if the trials are fair as long as he is jailed.

 

[Gimmesometruth]

Why you didn't say that when I first asked

I never said you were responsible;

.....

 

[Ouroboros]

.....

I asked you why you took your time rendering an explanation, which is a comment on your obvious lack of etiquette. That's a long way from me supposedly holding you responsible for my not knowing something, which was your original contention.