- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,380
- Reaction score
- 10,659
- Location
- US Southwest
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
This is getting silly again, if you don't know, if you don't have an understanding, i can't continue on with this. there has to be some level of basic understanding of US poli-sci .....and it just doesnt seem to be there. I have already explained how in very general terms....the rest is up to find out. I am not here to educate you up to a 4th year HS level.Why were they not liberals?
When it came to supporting economic programs that helped their state, the South was on board....The fact that both Southern and Northern Democrats were broadly supportive of the New Deal.
Yup, as noted above.A coalition that stayed together, up and until the Civil Rights issue.
No, I made fun of your errors, your semantic games, your twisting.....but on most fact based arguments, I directly answered you.You made a broad and vague accusation.
What else am I to do?
You're just trying really hard to avoid my questions by deflection.
Perhaps if you quoted a few current 'left-wing' groups espousing racism, rather than 200-year-old examples, when 'left' and 'right' had utterly different connotations, it might help. Nevertheless....Some people here believe that racism is automatically right wing.
When there are many instances of left wing groups espousing racism.
Kinda depends on what you mean by 'right-wing' doesn't it? I'd suggest that being a staunch nationalist makes being non-racist a fairly tall order.Nothing, except that someone decided to start crapping on this thread by accusing right wing people of being racist, hate mongers.
In a manner of speaking.
Actually bigotry means what you think it doesn't mean, and doesn't mean what you think it means.
This is getting silly again, if you don't know, if you don't have an understanding, i can't continue on with this. there has to be some level of basic understanding of US poli-sci .....and it just doesnt seem to be there. I have already explained how in very general terms....the rest is up to find out. I am not here to educate you up to a 4th year HS level.
When it came to supporting economic programs that helped their state, the South was on board....
The coalition was never formally organized, and the constituent members often disagreed. The coalition usually supported liberal proposals in domestic affairs, but was less united in terms of foreign policy and racial issues.
No, I made fun of your errors, your semantic games, your twisting.....but on most fact based arguments, I directly answered you.
Gotta go, time to eat.
Perhaps if you quoted a few current 'left-wing' groups espousing racism, rather than 200-year-old examples, when 'left' and 'right' had utterly different connotations, it might help. Nevertheless....
Perhaps if you quoted a few current 'left-wing' groups espousing racism, rather than 200-year-old examples, when 'left' and 'right' had utterly different connotations, it might help. Nevertheless....
It depends on what one defines as 'left' and 'right', doesn't it? As there is no clear or rational definition of what these words mean, to someone identifying themself as left-wing, right-wing will always denote something universally recognised as unfavourable. And vice versa. These 'left' and 'right' terms in a US political context are virtually meaningless.
Kinda depends on what you mean by 'right-wing' doesn't it? I'd suggest that being a staunch nationalist makes being non-racist a fairly tall order.
Wow....231 posts into it and several warnings and I thought for SURE we would know something about who, how, and why before the personal stuff started flying...
They were both Caucasian. think this might be racially motivated.
Most Sikhs are caucasian.
No Sikhs are Asians like all the other people from India.
No, most Sikhs are Caucasian. Yes, this is a fact. Take a good look at the Sikh talking to reporters in the video. Does he look Asian to you?
Temple member describes shooting - CNN.com Video
Most Sikhs are caucasian.
Yeah... He does... I think you're mixed up about South Asians. Like people from India other than Sikhs. They're Asian.
Yeah... He does... I think you're mixed up about South Asians. Like people from India other than Sikhs. They're Asian.
Please do not ever procreate.
South Asians make up a large number of ethnic groups, north and west india people look Persian, in Arunachal Pradesh they will tend to look Oriental, in southern Indian you get the Tamils, and other similar looking ethnicities
Persians and those that look like them are considered to be caucasians
Yeah. It is a very diverse region of the world. But people from India, including Sikhs, are most definitely Asian. They consider themselves Asian, as do all demographic statistics and whatnot.
Yeah. It is a very diverse region of the world. But people from India, including Sikhs, are most definitely Asian. They consider themselves Asian, as do all demographic statistics and whatnot.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?